Survey of healthcare-associated sink infrastructure, and sink trap antibiotic residues and biochemistry, in twenty-nine UK hospitals

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Hospital Infection Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2025.02.002
G. Rodger , K.K. Chau , P. Aranega Bou , G. Moore , A. Roohi
{"title":"Survey of healthcare-associated sink infrastructure, and sink trap antibiotic residues and biochemistry, in twenty-nine UK hospitals","authors":"G. Rodger ,&nbsp;K.K. Chau ,&nbsp;P. Aranega Bou ,&nbsp;G. Moore ,&nbsp;A. Roohi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hospital sinks are linked to healthcare-associated infections. Antibiotics and chemicals in sink traps can select for pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Optimizing sink design and usage can mitigate sink-to-patient dissemination of pathogens.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To perform a large-scale survey of hospital sink infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-nine UK hospitals submitted photos and metadata for sinks across three wards (intensive care unit (ICU)/medical/surgical; January–March 2023). Photos were used to classify sink design as ‘optimal’ according to guidelines and published studies. Sink trap aspirates were dipstick-tested for antibiotics and chemistry. Logistic regression was used to characterize associations of ward type and sink location with optimal sink design or detectable trap antibiotics.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 287 sinks surveyed, 111 were in ICUs, 92 in medical wards, and 84 in surgical wards; 77 were in medicines/drug preparation rooms, 97 on patient bays, 25 in patient side-rooms, and 88 in sluice rooms. Sink-to-bed ratios ranged from 0.23 to 2.83 sinks per patient bed and were higher on ICUs (1.21 versus 0.82 and 0.84 on medical and surgical wards, respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.04). The median sink-to-patient distance was 1.5 m (interquartile range: 1.00–2.21 m). Sink design varied widely; it was deemed ‘optimal’ for 65/122 (53%) sinks in patient bays/side-rooms and ‘optimal’ design was associated with side-room location (<em>P</em> = 0.03). Antibiotics were detected in 95/287 (33%) sink traps and were associated with medicines/drug preparation rooms (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001). Sink trap chemicals detected included metals, chlorine, and fluoride.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sinks are common in hospitals, frequently close to patients, and often sub-optimally designed. Commonly used antibiotics were detected in a third of sink traps and may contribute to the selection of pathogens and AMR in these reservoirs, and subsequent transmission to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"159 ","pages":"Pages 140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125000337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hospital sinks are linked to healthcare-associated infections. Antibiotics and chemicals in sink traps can select for pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Optimizing sink design and usage can mitigate sink-to-patient dissemination of pathogens.

Aim

To perform a large-scale survey of hospital sink infrastructure.

Methods

Twenty-nine UK hospitals submitted photos and metadata for sinks across three wards (intensive care unit (ICU)/medical/surgical; January–March 2023). Photos were used to classify sink design as ‘optimal’ according to guidelines and published studies. Sink trap aspirates were dipstick-tested for antibiotics and chemistry. Logistic regression was used to characterize associations of ward type and sink location with optimal sink design or detectable trap antibiotics.

Findings

Of 287 sinks surveyed, 111 were in ICUs, 92 in medical wards, and 84 in surgical wards; 77 were in medicines/drug preparation rooms, 97 on patient bays, 25 in patient side-rooms, and 88 in sluice rooms. Sink-to-bed ratios ranged from 0.23 to 2.83 sinks per patient bed and were higher on ICUs (1.21 versus 0.82 and 0.84 on medical and surgical wards, respectively; P = 0.04). The median sink-to-patient distance was 1.5 m (interquartile range: 1.00–2.21 m). Sink design varied widely; it was deemed ‘optimal’ for 65/122 (53%) sinks in patient bays/side-rooms and ‘optimal’ design was associated with side-room location (P = 0.03). Antibiotics were detected in 95/287 (33%) sink traps and were associated with medicines/drug preparation rooms (P <0.001). Sink trap chemicals detected included metals, chlorine, and fluoride.

Conclusion

Sinks are common in hospitals, frequently close to patients, and often sub-optimally designed. Commonly used antibiotics were detected in a third of sink traps and may contribute to the selection of pathogens and AMR in these reservoirs, and subsequent transmission to patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在29家英国医院对医疗保健相关的水槽基础设施、水槽陷阱抗生素残留和生物化学进行调查。
背景:医院水槽与医疗保健相关感染有关。汇捕集器中的抗生素和化学品可以根据病原体和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)进行选择。优化水槽设计和使用可以减轻病原体在水槽到患者的传播,但缺乏对医院水槽基础设施的大规模调查。方法:29家英国医院提交了三个病房(ICU/内科/外科;1 - 2023)。根据指南和已发表的研究,照片被用来将水槽设计分类为“最佳”。用试纸对吸出液进行抗生素和化学检测。Logistic回归分析了病房类型和洗涤池位置与最佳洗涤池设计或可检测的陷阱抗生素之间的关系。结果:287个水槽中,icu 111个,内科病房92个,外科病房84个;77人在药品/药物配制室,97人在病人舱,25人在病人侧室,88人在水闸室。水槽与床的比率从0.23-2.83水槽/病床不等,icu更高(分别为1.21,内科和外科病房分别为0.82和0.84;假定值= 0.04)。水槽到患者的中位距离为1.5m (IQR: 1.00-2.21m)。水槽的设计变化很大;患者舱/侧室中有65/122个(53%)水槽被认为是“最佳”的,“最佳”设计与侧室位置相关(p值=0.04)。在95/287个(33%)与药品/制剂室相关的洗涤池中检出抗生素(结论:医院中洗涤池普遍存在,往往离患者较近,且设计不够优化。在三分之一的汇诱捕器中检测到常用抗生素,这可能有助于这些库中病原体和抗菌素耐药性的选择,并随后传播给患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
期刊最新文献
Wastewater-based surveillance of respiratory viruses in a geriatric hospital: a pilot study Global trends and thematic evolution in antimicrobial stewardship research: a comprehensive bibliometric and network analysis (1977–2025) Implant-retaining management of cranioplasty-related surgical infections Standardizing manual cleaning of endoscopes: assessing the effectiveness of the AquaTYPHOON device Genome-oriented outbreak management reveals the first detection of concurrent transmissions of Serratia sarumanii and Serratia bockelmannii in a neonatal department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1