Distinguishing Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumors from Meningiomas: The Diagnostic Value of T1-Weighted MRI Signal Intensity and ADC Values.

Shinichi Cho, Ryo Kurokawa, Sosuke Hatano, Shintaro Kano, Tomohiro Higuchi, Haruka Masuzawa, Mai Sato, Shiori Amemiya, Osamu Abe
{"title":"Distinguishing Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumors from Meningiomas: The Diagnostic Value of T1-Weighted MRI Signal Intensity and ADC Values.","authors":"Shinichi Cho, Ryo Kurokawa, Sosuke Hatano, Shintaro Kano, Tomohiro Higuchi, Haruka Masuzawa, Mai Sato, Shiori Amemiya, Osamu Abe","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and meningiomas are CNS tumors that share similar imaging manifestations but exhibit different clinical behaviors. This study aimed to compare ADC values and conventional imaging features, particularly pre-contrast T1-weighted signal intensity, between intracranial SFTs and meningiomas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 13 patients with pathologically proven intracranial SFTs and 27 patients with meningiomas who attended our hospital between January 2002 and December 2023. Signal intensity on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (compared to cerebral cortex), presence of dural tail sign, flow voids, hyperostosis, calcification, and normalized mean T1-weighted imaging values and mean ADC values were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T1-weighted hyperintensity was significantly more frequent in SFTs (10/13, 76.9%) compared to meningiomas (5/27, 18.5%) (P=0.0010). Normalized mean T1-weighted imaging values (P=0.035) and normalized mean ADC values (P=0.039) were significantly higher in SFTs compared to meningiomas. A significant inverse correlation between normalized mean T1-weighted imaging and ADC values was observed in SFTs (R-squared=0.42, P=0.017). Binomial logistic regression analysis showed moderate efficacy in differentiating these tumors (mean cross-validation score=0.83). Dural tail sign, hyperostosis, and calcification were more frequent in meningiomas, although these differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-contrast T1-weighted signal intensity is a useful characteristic for differentiating intracranial SFTs from meningiomas, with hyperintensity compared to cerebral cortex being a distinctive feature of SFTs. The combination of normalized T1-weighted imaging and ADC values provides moderate diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>SFT = solitary fibrous tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and meningiomas are CNS tumors that share similar imaging manifestations but exhibit different clinical behaviors. This study aimed to compare ADC values and conventional imaging features, particularly pre-contrast T1-weighted signal intensity, between intracranial SFTs and meningiomas.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 13 patients with pathologically proven intracranial SFTs and 27 patients with meningiomas who attended our hospital between January 2002 and December 2023. Signal intensity on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (compared to cerebral cortex), presence of dural tail sign, flow voids, hyperostosis, calcification, and normalized mean T1-weighted imaging values and mean ADC values were assessed.

Results: T1-weighted hyperintensity was significantly more frequent in SFTs (10/13, 76.9%) compared to meningiomas (5/27, 18.5%) (P=0.0010). Normalized mean T1-weighted imaging values (P=0.035) and normalized mean ADC values (P=0.039) were significantly higher in SFTs compared to meningiomas. A significant inverse correlation between normalized mean T1-weighted imaging and ADC values was observed in SFTs (R-squared=0.42, P=0.017). Binomial logistic regression analysis showed moderate efficacy in differentiating these tumors (mean cross-validation score=0.83). Dural tail sign, hyperostosis, and calcification were more frequent in meningiomas, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Pre-contrast T1-weighted signal intensity is a useful characteristic for differentiating intracranial SFTs from meningiomas, with hyperintensity compared to cerebral cortex being a distinctive feature of SFTs. The combination of normalized T1-weighted imaging and ADC values provides moderate diagnostic accuracy.

Abbreviations: SFT = solitary fibrous tumors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of the BATMAN Score in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Thrombectomy for Basilar Arterial Occlusion: A Frequentist and Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Norrie Disease: Cochlear Enhancement and Cerebellar Signal Abnormalities. Safety and Efficacy of Combined Venous Sinus Balloon Protection Technique in transarterial Embolization of Low-and intermediate-grade Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Cohort of 161 patients. Distinguishing Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumors from Meningiomas: The Diagnostic Value of T1-Weighted MRI Signal Intensity and ADC Values. In vivo visualisation of Charcot-Bouchard Aneurysms on lenticulostriate arteries using 7T MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1