Laure Maes , Anna Szabó , Jens Van Haevermaete , Indi Geurs , Koen Dewettinck , Roosmarijn E. Vandenbroucke , Sandra Van Vlierberghe , Debby Laukens
{"title":"Digital light processing of photo-crosslinkable gelatin to create biomimetic 3D constructs serving small intestinal tissue regeneration","authors":"Laure Maes , Anna Szabó , Jens Van Haevermaete , Indi Geurs , Koen Dewettinck , Roosmarijn E. Vandenbroucke , Sandra Van Vlierberghe , Debby Laukens","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regeneration of small intestinal mucosal tissue could offer a promising strategy for Crohn's disease patients suffering from chronic inflammatory damage. Here, we aimed to develop hydrogels that mirror the villi and crypts of the small intestine and exhibit a physiological stiffness of <em>G'</em> ~ 1.52 kPa. For this purpose, we developed gelatin-methacryloyl-aminoethyl-methacrylate (gel-MA-AEMA)-, and gelatin-methacryloyl-norbornene (gel-MA-NB)-based biomaterial inks to fabricate 3D hydrogels (“villi only” versus “crypts and villi”) with digital light processing (DLP) and co-cultured Caco-2/HT29-MTX cells. Gel-MA-AEMA was selected for its higher amount of methacrylates which was hypothesized to provide superior photo-crosslinking kinetics and hence superior DLP fabrication potential while gel-MA-NB was evaluated for its selective functionalization potential with thiolated bioactive compounds following DLP processing, resulting from its incorporated NB moieties which remain unreacted during the DLP process. Both gel-MA-AEMA-, and gel-MA-NB-based hydrogels exhibited a physiologically relevant stiffness, but only the gel-MA-AEMA-based biomaterial ink could be successfully utilized for printing hydrogels encompassing villi and crypts. Paracellular permeability of small sized marker molecules in combination with transepithelial electrical resistance measurements showed the formation of a functional barrier over time on all hydrogel constructs. Transmission electron microscopy and enterocyte differentiation marker genes' expression levels revealed the superior differentiation of Caco-2 on the 3D constructs compared to 2D hydrogel sheets. In summary, while both hydrogels enhanced functional barrier formation and enterocyte differentiation, gel-MA-AEMA proved more conducive to DLP compared to gel-MA-NB. Furthermore, our study underscored the benefits of cultivating intestinal cells on soft 3D constructs, enhancing cell barrier properties and differentiation, thus providing added value over traditional 2D supports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 214232"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825000597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Regeneration of small intestinal mucosal tissue could offer a promising strategy for Crohn's disease patients suffering from chronic inflammatory damage. Here, we aimed to develop hydrogels that mirror the villi and crypts of the small intestine and exhibit a physiological stiffness of G' ~ 1.52 kPa. For this purpose, we developed gelatin-methacryloyl-aminoethyl-methacrylate (gel-MA-AEMA)-, and gelatin-methacryloyl-norbornene (gel-MA-NB)-based biomaterial inks to fabricate 3D hydrogels (“villi only” versus “crypts and villi”) with digital light processing (DLP) and co-cultured Caco-2/HT29-MTX cells. Gel-MA-AEMA was selected for its higher amount of methacrylates which was hypothesized to provide superior photo-crosslinking kinetics and hence superior DLP fabrication potential while gel-MA-NB was evaluated for its selective functionalization potential with thiolated bioactive compounds following DLP processing, resulting from its incorporated NB moieties which remain unreacted during the DLP process. Both gel-MA-AEMA-, and gel-MA-NB-based hydrogels exhibited a physiologically relevant stiffness, but only the gel-MA-AEMA-based biomaterial ink could be successfully utilized for printing hydrogels encompassing villi and crypts. Paracellular permeability of small sized marker molecules in combination with transepithelial electrical resistance measurements showed the formation of a functional barrier over time on all hydrogel constructs. Transmission electron microscopy and enterocyte differentiation marker genes' expression levels revealed the superior differentiation of Caco-2 on the 3D constructs compared to 2D hydrogel sheets. In summary, while both hydrogels enhanced functional barrier formation and enterocyte differentiation, gel-MA-AEMA proved more conducive to DLP compared to gel-MA-NB. Furthermore, our study underscored the benefits of cultivating intestinal cells on soft 3D constructs, enhancing cell barrier properties and differentiation, thus providing added value over traditional 2D supports.
小肠黏膜组织的再生为克罗恩病慢性炎症损伤患者提供了一个有希望的策略。在这里,我们的目标是开发反映小肠绒毛和隐窝的水凝胶,其生理硬度为G′~ 1.52 kPa。为此,我们开发了明胶-甲基丙烯-氨基乙基-甲基丙烯酸酯(凝胶- ma - aema)-和明胶-甲基丙烯-降龙骨烯(凝胶- ma - nb)为基础的生物材料墨水,通过数字光处理(DLP)和共培养Caco-2/HT29-MTX细胞来制造3D水凝胶(“仅绒毛”与“隐窝和绒毛”)。选择Gel-MA-AEMA是因为它含有大量的甲基丙烯酸酯,这被假设为提供优越的光交联动力学,因此具有优越的DLP制造潜力,而凝胶- ma -NB则是因为它在DLP处理后与硫代生物活性化合物的选择性功能化潜力,这是由于它的NB部分在DLP过程中保持未反应。凝胶- ma - aema -和凝胶- ma - nb基水凝胶均表现出生理相关的硬度,但只有凝胶- ma - aema基生物材料墨水可以成功地用于打印包含绒毛和隐窝的水凝胶。小尺寸标记分子的细胞旁渗透性结合经上皮电阻测量显示,随着时间的推移,在所有水凝胶结构上形成了功能屏障。透射电镜和肠细胞分化标记基因的表达水平显示,Caco-2在3D构建物上的分化优于2D水凝胶片。综上所述,尽管两种水凝胶都增强了功能屏障的形成和肠细胞分化,但与凝胶- ma - nb相比,凝胶- ma - aema更有利于DLP。此外,我们的研究强调了在软3D结构上培养肠道细胞的好处,增强了细胞的屏障特性和分化,从而提供了比传统2D支持更大的价值。
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!