Statistical design for optimal physical and biomechanical characteristics of biocomposite prostheses

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02593
Ibrahim Hassan Kobe , Abdulrahman Asipital Salawu , Abolarin Mathew Sunday , Adedipe Oyewole , Okoro Gregory Uzoma , Peter Olorunleke Omoniyi , Tien-Chien Jen
{"title":"Statistical design for optimal physical and biomechanical characteristics of biocomposite prostheses","authors":"Ibrahim Hassan Kobe ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Asipital Salawu ,&nbsp;Abolarin Mathew Sunday ,&nbsp;Adedipe Oyewole ,&nbsp;Okoro Gregory Uzoma ,&nbsp;Peter Olorunleke Omoniyi ,&nbsp;Tien-Chien Jen","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mechanical properties of many prostheses are the causes of the stress shielding effect resulting from the imbalance of the prosthesis and human bone, which leads to the premature failure of the prosthesis after installation for bone replacement or repair. The present study uses statistical design to obtain optimal biomechanical properties of biocomposite prostheses to replace orthopaedic bone. The study utilized Pure Titanium (P-Ti) powder reinforced with Hydroxyapatites (Ha) and Calcium Carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) as the factors of the experiment, and the physical and mechanical properties were considered as the response. The experiment design was conducted with statistical software (Design Expert) using Determinant Optimal Mixture Design of Experiment (DM-DOE) and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Biocomposites were developed using powder metallurgy techniques, and the experimental samples' mechanical, physical, and morphological characteristics were analyzed. The result showed that the optimum biocomposite formulations are 68.36 Ti, 18.36 Cow Bone-Based Hydroxyapatites (CB-Ha), and 8.17 CaCO<sub>3</sub> by maximizing the mechanical properties and minimizing stiffness and physical properties suitable for the replacement bone. The results revealed a closer value of bone modulus with the decreased modulus (54.23 GPa), density (4.09 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), and porosity (9.56 %). There was also an enhancement of other mechanical properties with predicted compressive strength (162.17 MPa), Hardness (378.62 Hv), impact strength (11.43 KJ/m<sup>2</sup>), and Fracture toughness (26.11 MPa m0.5). The ANOVA revealed that CB-Ha and CaCO<sub>3</sub> are crucial factors in minimizing the prosthesis stiffness, which has interactive effects on the formulation of biocomposite.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e02593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625000638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanical properties of many prostheses are the causes of the stress shielding effect resulting from the imbalance of the prosthesis and human bone, which leads to the premature failure of the prosthesis after installation for bone replacement or repair. The present study uses statistical design to obtain optimal biomechanical properties of biocomposite prostheses to replace orthopaedic bone. The study utilized Pure Titanium (P-Ti) powder reinforced with Hydroxyapatites (Ha) and Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) as the factors of the experiment, and the physical and mechanical properties were considered as the response. The experiment design was conducted with statistical software (Design Expert) using Determinant Optimal Mixture Design of Experiment (DM-DOE) and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Biocomposites were developed using powder metallurgy techniques, and the experimental samples' mechanical, physical, and morphological characteristics were analyzed. The result showed that the optimum biocomposite formulations are 68.36 Ti, 18.36 Cow Bone-Based Hydroxyapatites (CB-Ha), and 8.17 CaCO3 by maximizing the mechanical properties and minimizing stiffness and physical properties suitable for the replacement bone. The results revealed a closer value of bone modulus with the decreased modulus (54.23 GPa), density (4.09 g/cm3), and porosity (9.56 %). There was also an enhancement of other mechanical properties with predicted compressive strength (162.17 MPa), Hardness (378.62 Hv), impact strength (11.43 KJ/m2), and Fracture toughness (26.11 MPa m0.5). The ANOVA revealed that CB-Ha and CaCO3 are crucial factors in minimizing the prosthesis stiffness, which has interactive effects on the formulation of biocomposite.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the evolutionary dynamics of second-line Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in Tanzania using hypercubic modelling and the Baum–Welch algorithm Density and dentability in norm-attainable classes Computational screening campaign reveal natural candidates as potential ASK1 inhibitors: Pharmacophore modeling, molecular docking, MMGBSA calculations, ADMET prediction, and molecular dynamics simulation studies Advancements in seasonal rainfall forecasting: A seasonal auto-regressive integrated moving average model with outlier adjustments for Ghana's Western Region Impact of rs3077 (HLA-DPA1 gene) on chronic hepatitis B virus carriage in Cotonou
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1