A dose–response meta-analysis of grape by-product effects on lamb growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters

IF 4.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101449
J. Bahrampour , A.H. Piray , A. Mousaie , M. H. Ghaffari
{"title":"A dose–response meta-analysis of grape by-product effects on lamb growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters","authors":"J. Bahrampour ,&nbsp;A.H. Piray ,&nbsp;A. Mousaie ,&nbsp;M. H. Ghaffari","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies on feeding grape by-products (<strong>GBP</strong>) to lambs have shown conflicting results regarding performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and blood constituents. To clarify these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and dose-dependent effects of GBP in lamb diets. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, including the localisation of knots, leave-one-out tests and the exclusion of data points with high GBP addition (more than 600 g/kg). The results showed that GBP addition had no statistically significant effect on DMI (<em>P</em> = 0.92), average daily gain (<em>P</em> = 0.21) or final live weight (<em>P</em> = 0.36). However, GBP inclusion had a significant effect on feed conversion ratio (<em>P</em> = 0.002), with lambs fed up to 450 g/kg GBP showing an improved feed conversion ratio, which peaked at 200 g/kg. ADF digestibility was not significantly affected by GBP inclusion (<em>P</em> = 0.08). Conversely, significant negative linear correlations were observed between the consumption of GBP and the digestibility of OM (<em>P</em> = 0.03), CP (<em>P</em> = 0.002), DM (<em>P</em> = 0.001) and NDF (<em>P</em> = 0.004). In contrast, the intake of GBP was positively associated with fat digestibility (<em>P</em> = 0.001). The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between GBP intake and urinary nitrogen excretion, nitrogen consumed, faecal nitrogen excretion, or nitrogen retained. Blood analysis also showed no significant correlation between GBP consumption and serum concentrations of albumin, cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, or total protein. However, blood urea nitrogen concentration showed a significant non-linear, J-shaped relationship with GBP consumption (<em>P</em> = 0.001), decreasing with GBP inclusion up to 250 g/kg DM, with no significant changes at higher levels. No statistically significant effects of GBP on serum AST (<em>P</em> = 0.28) or GGT (<em>P</em> = 0.93) were observed. In contrast, GBP intake of up to 200 g/kg DM significantly reduced ALT activity in serum (<em>P</em> = 0.009). In conclusion, the intake of GBP shows a dose-dependent response that affects nutrient digestibility and may influence feed efficiency and health status of lambs. Intake of GBP in the range of 200–400 g/kg DM can improve feed conversion ratio and health but can also reduce the digestibility of certain feed components such as OM, DM, CP and NDF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731125000321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies on feeding grape by-products (GBP) to lambs have shown conflicting results regarding performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and blood constituents. To clarify these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and dose-dependent effects of GBP in lamb diets. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, including the localisation of knots, leave-one-out tests and the exclusion of data points with high GBP addition (more than 600 g/kg). The results showed that GBP addition had no statistically significant effect on DMI (P = 0.92), average daily gain (P = 0.21) or final live weight (P = 0.36). However, GBP inclusion had a significant effect on feed conversion ratio (P = 0.002), with lambs fed up to 450 g/kg GBP showing an improved feed conversion ratio, which peaked at 200 g/kg. ADF digestibility was not significantly affected by GBP inclusion (P = 0.08). Conversely, significant negative linear correlations were observed between the consumption of GBP and the digestibility of OM (P = 0.03), CP (P = 0.002), DM (P = 0.001) and NDF (P = 0.004). In contrast, the intake of GBP was positively associated with fat digestibility (P = 0.001). The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between GBP intake and urinary nitrogen excretion, nitrogen consumed, faecal nitrogen excretion, or nitrogen retained. Blood analysis also showed no significant correlation between GBP consumption and serum concentrations of albumin, cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, or total protein. However, blood urea nitrogen concentration showed a significant non-linear, J-shaped relationship with GBP consumption (P = 0.001), decreasing with GBP inclusion up to 250 g/kg DM, with no significant changes at higher levels. No statistically significant effects of GBP on serum AST (P = 0.28) or GGT (P = 0.93) were observed. In contrast, GBP intake of up to 200 g/kg DM significantly reduced ALT activity in serum (P = 0.009). In conclusion, the intake of GBP shows a dose-dependent response that affects nutrient digestibility and may influence feed efficiency and health status of lambs. Intake of GBP in the range of 200–400 g/kg DM can improve feed conversion ratio and health but can also reduce the digestibility of certain feed components such as OM, DM, CP and NDF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄副产物对羔羊生长性能、营养物质消化率和血液参数影响的剂量效应荟萃分析
以往关于给羔羊喂食葡萄副产品(GBP)的研究在生产性能、营养物质消化率、氮代谢和血液成分方面显示出相互矛盾的结果。为了澄清这些不确定性,我们进行了系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析,以评估GBP在羔羊日粮中的功效和剂量依赖性效应。进行敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性,包括结的定位、遗漏测试和排除高GBP添加(超过600 g/kg)的数据点。结果显示,添加GBP对DMI (P = 0.92)、平均日增重(P = 0.21)和最终活重(P = 0.36)均无显著影响。然而,添加GBP对饲料转化率有显著影响(P = 0.002),羔羊饲粮添加450 g/kg GBP时,饲料转化率有所提高,在200 g/kg时达到峰值。GBP对ADF消化率无显著影响(P = 0.08)。相反,GBP消耗与OM消化率(P = 0.03)、CP (P = 0.002)、DM (P = 0.001)和NDF (P = 0.004)之间呈显著的负线性相关。相比之下,GBP的摄入量与脂肪消化率呈正相关(P = 0.001)。荟萃分析显示GBP摄入量与尿氮排泄、氮消耗、粪氮排泄或氮保留之间无显著关联。血液分析也显示GBP消耗量与血清白蛋白、胆固醇、葡萄糖、甘油三酯或总蛋白浓度之间无显著相关性。然而,血液尿素氮浓度与GBP消耗量呈显著的非线性j型关系(P = 0.001),当GBP含量达到250 g/kg DM时,尿素氮浓度下降,在更高水平时无显著变化。GBP对血清AST (P = 0.28)和GGT (P = 0.93)的影响无统计学意义。相比之下,GBP摄入量高达200 g/kg DM可显著降低血清ALT活性(P = 0.009)。综上所述,GBP的摄入量呈剂量依赖性,影响营养物质的消化率,并可能影响羔羊的饲料效率和健康状况。饲粮中添加GBP 200 ~ 400 g/kg DM可提高饲料系数和健康水平,但也会降低OM、DM、CP和NDF等部分饲料成分的消化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Challenging a mathematical model of amino acid metabolism in the small intestine, developed in pigs Genetic parameters of larval weight and length in yellow mealworm under tropical conditions: heritability and implications for breeding programmes Dietary hydrolysed tannins regulate carcass performance and meat traits in Hu sheep through microbial regulation Review: Understanding cattle social behaviour in modern penned production systems with AI technology: Are we tracking welfare indicators? An integrated individual-based model of transmission, clinical outcomes, and economic impact of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in a commercial pig fattening unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1