Incidencia de retirada no programada de dispositivos invasivos en enfermos con COVID-19 en cuidados intensivos

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2024.07.003
Susana Arias-Rivera PhDc, MsN, RN , Raquel Jareño-Collado RN , María del Mar Sánchez-Sánchez MsN, RN , Fernando Frutos-Vivar MD
{"title":"Incidencia de retirada no programada de dispositivos invasivos en enfermos con COVID-19 en cuidados intensivos","authors":"Susana Arias-Rivera PhDc, MsN, RN ,&nbsp;Raquel Jareño-Collado RN ,&nbsp;María del Mar Sánchez-Sánchez MsN, RN ,&nbsp;Fernando Frutos-Vivar MD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The rate of unscheduled removal of invasive devices (ID) is an indicator of quality programmes in the critically ill. Our research group performed prevalence analyses since 2010 and another during the pandemic. The aim was to analyse the rates of use and non-planed removal of endotracheal tubes, catheters (central venous and arterial) and enteral catheters in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic comparing them with previous rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Prevalence study in a polyvalente ICU. After 4 prospective observational analyses (2010, 2011, 2018, 2019) a retrospective analysis was performed (8 March-8 May 2020). Variables: diagnosis, stay and reason for removal of ID (endotracheal tubes (ET), central venous catheters, arterial catheters and enteral catheters) and rate of reintubation after self-removal of ET. Variables analysed and described as accidental removal rates per 1000 device-days and rates of ID use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2026 patients were included (631 in 2010, 724 in 2011, 210 in 2018, 361 in 2019 and 100 in 2020). Significant differences, between all periods, in diagnoses (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), ICU stay (<em>P</em>&lt;.001) and mortality (<em>P</em>=.016) and, between 2020 and all other periods, in rates of use per 100 days-stay (<em>P</em>&lt;.010) and per 100 admissions (<em>P</em>&lt;.001) in all devices except arterial catheter. In 2020, there was an increase in ET obstruction (36.0%; rate 20.27 per 1000 intubation/days, <em>P</em>&lt;.010), decrease in ET self-removals (2020 rate: 0.00 per 1000 intubation/days; <em>P</em>&lt;.050) and enteral catheters (14.33 per 1000 catheter/days). Overall reintubation (all periods) after self-extubation: 12.5%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The rate of devices self-removal in COVID-19 patients in the first wave of the pandemic was lower than that observed in the previous four periods. The high incidence rate of ET obstruction in these patients was significant and relevant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 100507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The rate of unscheduled removal of invasive devices (ID) is an indicator of quality programmes in the critically ill. Our research group performed prevalence analyses since 2010 and another during the pandemic. The aim was to analyse the rates of use and non-planed removal of endotracheal tubes, catheters (central venous and arterial) and enteral catheters in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic comparing them with previous rates.

Methodology

Prevalence study in a polyvalente ICU. After 4 prospective observational analyses (2010, 2011, 2018, 2019) a retrospective analysis was performed (8 March-8 May 2020). Variables: diagnosis, stay and reason for removal of ID (endotracheal tubes (ET), central venous catheters, arterial catheters and enteral catheters) and rate of reintubation after self-removal of ET. Variables analysed and described as accidental removal rates per 1000 device-days and rates of ID use.

Results

2026 patients were included (631 in 2010, 724 in 2011, 210 in 2018, 361 in 2019 and 100 in 2020). Significant differences, between all periods, in diagnoses (P<.001), ICU stay (P<.001) and mortality (P=.016) and, between 2020 and all other periods, in rates of use per 100 days-stay (P<.010) and per 100 admissions (P<.001) in all devices except arterial catheter. In 2020, there was an increase in ET obstruction (36.0%; rate 20.27 per 1000 intubation/days, P<.010), decrease in ET self-removals (2020 rate: 0.00 per 1000 intubation/days; P<.050) and enteral catheters (14.33 per 1000 catheter/days). Overall reintubation (all periods) after self-extubation: 12.5%.

Conclusions

The rate of devices self-removal in COVID-19 patients in the first wave of the pandemic was lower than that observed in the previous four periods. The high incidence rate of ET obstruction in these patients was significant and relevant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病重症监护病房中侵入性装置意外移除的发生率
非计划移除侵入性装置(ID)的比率是危重病人质量规划的一个指标。我们的研究小组自2010年以来进行了患病率分析,另一次是在大流行期间进行的。目的是分析2019冠状病毒病第一波大流行期间气管内管、导管(中心静脉和动脉)和肠内导管的使用率和非计划拔除率,并将其与之前的使用率进行比较。方法多价ICU的患病率研究。经过4次前瞻性观察分析(2010年、2011年、2018年和2019年),进行了回顾性分析(2020年3月8日至5月8日)。变量:诊断、拔除ID(气管内管(ET)、中心静脉导管、动脉导管和肠内导管)的停留时间和原因,以及自行拔除ET后的再插管率。变量分析和描述为每1000个设备日的意外拔除率和ID使用率。结果共纳入2026例患者(2010年631例,2011年724例,2018年210例,2019年361例,2020年100例)。所有时期的诊断率(P< 0.001)、ICU住院率(P< 0.001)和死亡率(P= 0.016)以及2020年与所有其他时期除动脉导管外所有装置的每100天住院率(P< 0.010)和每100次入院率(P< 0.001)均存在显著差异。2020年,ET梗阻发生率增加了36.0%;比率为20.27 / 1000插管/天,P< 0.010), ET自清除减少(2020年比率:0.00 / 1000插管/天;P< 0.050)和肠内导管(14.33 / 1000导管/天)。自拔管后整体再插管(所有时期):12.5%。结论第一波疫情中,COVID-19患者的器械自行取出率低于前四波疫情。这些患者ET梗阻的高发生率具有显著性和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Nursing care in a patient with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: A case report Mapping transitional care models after ICU discharge for ECMO survivors: A scoping review Percepciones enfermeras sobre reuniones huddle en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos: estudio cualitativo exploratorio Utility of the Shock Index at ICU admission as a prognostic tool in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS: Implications for nursing practice Post-intensive care syndrome in adult survivors of a high-complexity intensive care unit in Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1