{"title":"Cancer risk due to ingestion of naturally occurring radionuclides through drinking water: A systematic review","authors":"Wafa Alimam , Anssi Auvinen","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Naturally occurring radionuclides can, in rare cases, reach high levels in drinking water of specific areas, leading to meaningful radiation exposures upon ingestion. Increased cancer risk is the only well-established health impact of exposure to low-dose radiation. Multiple ecological studies have shown conflicting results about cancer risk in areas of high levels of radionuclides in water. However, such studies have methodological limitations and are generally not highly informative. Studies with individual-level data are scarce and have not established a clear association either. To further investigate this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on cancer risk associated with radionuclide ingestion through drinking water, aiming to summarize and evaluate the current epidemiological evidence. Published studies have examined the effects of uranium, radium, and radon, while potential risks of polonium, radioactive lead, and thorium remain unknown. Existing research is heterogeneous regarding the cancer types assessed and faces methodological challenges, including limitations in exposure assessment, dosimetric uncertainties, low statistical power, and inadequate control of confounding factors. Due to lack of high-quality evidence, it is not possible to confirm or rule out an increased cancer risk among highly exposed populations. While risk assessment based on extrapolation from high dose studies does not suggest an excess cancer risk beyond background variation, such assessment involves considerable uncertainties. Future studies should focus on populations with high radionuclide exposure to provide sufficient exposure contrast, prioritizing radionuclides with high-dose coefficients and cancers in tissues with the highest radionuclide deposition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"968 ","pages":"Article 178849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500484X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Naturally occurring radionuclides can, in rare cases, reach high levels in drinking water of specific areas, leading to meaningful radiation exposures upon ingestion. Increased cancer risk is the only well-established health impact of exposure to low-dose radiation. Multiple ecological studies have shown conflicting results about cancer risk in areas of high levels of radionuclides in water. However, such studies have methodological limitations and are generally not highly informative. Studies with individual-level data are scarce and have not established a clear association either. To further investigate this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on cancer risk associated with radionuclide ingestion through drinking water, aiming to summarize and evaluate the current epidemiological evidence. Published studies have examined the effects of uranium, radium, and radon, while potential risks of polonium, radioactive lead, and thorium remain unknown. Existing research is heterogeneous regarding the cancer types assessed and faces methodological challenges, including limitations in exposure assessment, dosimetric uncertainties, low statistical power, and inadequate control of confounding factors. Due to lack of high-quality evidence, it is not possible to confirm or rule out an increased cancer risk among highly exposed populations. While risk assessment based on extrapolation from high dose studies does not suggest an excess cancer risk beyond background variation, such assessment involves considerable uncertainties. Future studies should focus on populations with high radionuclide exposure to provide sufficient exposure contrast, prioritizing radionuclides with high-dose coefficients and cancers in tissues with the highest radionuclide deposition.
期刊介绍:
The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.
The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.