Intensive rotational grazing has positive effects on productivity of rangeland

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109558
Ping Ge , Jianguo Xue , Yaqian Ru , Yulin Li , Dongxu Li , Peng Han , Ang Li , Jianhui Huang
{"title":"Intensive rotational grazing has positive effects on productivity of rangeland","authors":"Ping Ge ,&nbsp;Jianguo Xue ,&nbsp;Yaqian Ru ,&nbsp;Yulin Li ,&nbsp;Dongxu Li ,&nbsp;Peng Han ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Jianhui Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensive rotational grazing is a recently proposed rangeland management strategy that has been praised by the public and media but has not been fully proven or widely accepted by rangeland ecologists. In this study, a three-year experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of intensive rotational grazing on the rangeland ecosystem in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment involved three treatments of rotational management with the same level of grazing intensity (1 sheep unit per ha in the first year and 1.3 sheep unit per ha for the next two years), including intensive rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 3–5 days), traditional rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 15 days), and continuous grazing (without livestock rotation). In addition, this experiment set up “no grazing treatment” as the reference and represents the widely used policy of “grazing forbidden”. Compared with previous studies, this study first implemented rotational grazing at a low level of grazing intensity to obey the rangeland policy of Chinese governments, which aimed to balance the forage demand of livestock and the ecosystem conservation. The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments. Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species (<em>Leymus chinensis</em>) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment. Intensive rotational grazing could also promote the weight gain of grazing sheep. However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland. These results indicated that intensive rotational grazing had considerable advantages in realizing the sustainable management of grazing grasslands when grazing intensity was at a relatively low level, which aims to balance plant growth and livestock production of grasslands. Furthermore, our results suggest that intensive rotational grazing is beneficial for promoting the progressive succession of degraded grasslands and providing economic revenue for local herders, thus worth studying in more regions and rangeland scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 109558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive rotational grazing is a recently proposed rangeland management strategy that has been praised by the public and media but has not been fully proven or widely accepted by rangeland ecologists. In this study, a three-year experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of intensive rotational grazing on the rangeland ecosystem in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment involved three treatments of rotational management with the same level of grazing intensity (1 sheep unit per ha in the first year and 1.3 sheep unit per ha for the next two years), including intensive rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 3–5 days), traditional rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 15 days), and continuous grazing (without livestock rotation). In addition, this experiment set up “no grazing treatment” as the reference and represents the widely used policy of “grazing forbidden”. Compared with previous studies, this study first implemented rotational grazing at a low level of grazing intensity to obey the rangeland policy of Chinese governments, which aimed to balance the forage demand of livestock and the ecosystem conservation. The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments. Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species (Leymus chinensis) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment. Intensive rotational grazing could also promote the weight gain of grazing sheep. However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland. These results indicated that intensive rotational grazing had considerable advantages in realizing the sustainable management of grazing grasslands when grazing intensity was at a relatively low level, which aims to balance plant growth and livestock production of grasslands. Furthermore, our results suggest that intensive rotational grazing is beneficial for promoting the progressive succession of degraded grasslands and providing economic revenue for local herders, thus worth studying in more regions and rangeland scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集约轮牧对草地生产力有积极影响
集约化轮牧是最近提出的一种牧场管理策略,受到公众和媒体的赞扬,但尚未得到牧场生态学家的充分证实或广泛接受。本文以内蒙古典型草原为研究对象,进行了为期3年的轮牧对草地生态系统的影响。试验采用相同放牧强度水平(第一年1只羊/公顷,后两年1.3只羊/公顷)的3个轮牧处理,包括集约轮牧(每3-5天轮换一次)、传统轮牧(每15天轮换一次)和连续放牧(不轮换)。此外,本实验以“不放牧处理”为参照,代表了目前广泛使用的“禁止放牧”政策。与以往的研究相比,本研究遵循中国政府旨在平衡牲畜饲料需求和生态系统保护的牧地政策,首次在低水平的放牧强度下进行轮牧。结果表明,集约轮牧处理的地上生物量和根系生物量(0 ~ 10 cm深)显著高于其他两种放牧处理。在集约放牧处理下,优势种羊草(Leymus chinensis)的生物量及其在群落中的比例也较高。集约轮牧还能促进放牧羊的增重。然而,集约轮牧并没有改善草地的碳固存。这些结果表明,在较低的放牧强度下,集约轮牧在实现放牧草地的可持续管理方面具有相当大的优势,其目的是平衡草原的植物生长和牲畜生产。此外,集约轮牧有利于促进退化草地的逐步演替,为当地牧民提供经济收入,值得在更多的地区和草地情景下进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Atmospheric acid deposition leads to increased soil inorganic carbon loss on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Soil microarthropods mitigate nitrogen loss and enhance crop yield in residue-amended soils A global meta-analysis of forest edge effects on arthropod abundance and richness Soil microbial taxonomic traits control the biogeography of carbon use efficiency Straw return coupled with subsoiling tillage reduces N₂O emissions and increases nitrogen content under long-term (12 years) trial in a coastal saline cotton field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1