Intensive rotational grazing has positive effects on productivity of rangeland

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109558
Ping Ge , Jianguo Xue , Yaqian Ru , Yulin Li , Dongxu Li , Peng Han , Ang Li , Jianhui Huang
{"title":"Intensive rotational grazing has positive effects on productivity of rangeland","authors":"Ping Ge ,&nbsp;Jianguo Xue ,&nbsp;Yaqian Ru ,&nbsp;Yulin Li ,&nbsp;Dongxu Li ,&nbsp;Peng Han ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Jianhui Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensive rotational grazing is a recently proposed rangeland management strategy that has been praised by the public and media but has not been fully proven or widely accepted by rangeland ecologists. In this study, a three-year experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of intensive rotational grazing on the rangeland ecosystem in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment involved three treatments of rotational management with the same level of grazing intensity (1 sheep unit per ha in the first year and 1.3 sheep unit per ha for the next two years), including intensive rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 3–5 days), traditional rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 15 days), and continuous grazing (without livestock rotation). In addition, this experiment set up “no grazing treatment” as the reference and represents the widely used policy of “grazing forbidden”. Compared with previous studies, this study first implemented rotational grazing at a low level of grazing intensity to obey the rangeland policy of Chinese governments, which aimed to balance the forage demand of livestock and the ecosystem conservation. The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments. Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species (<em>Leymus chinensis</em>) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment. Intensive rotational grazing could also promote the weight gain of grazing sheep. However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland. These results indicated that intensive rotational grazing had considerable advantages in realizing the sustainable management of grazing grasslands when grazing intensity was at a relatively low level, which aims to balance plant growth and livestock production of grasslands. Furthermore, our results suggest that intensive rotational grazing is beneficial for promoting the progressive succession of degraded grasslands and providing economic revenue for local herders, thus worth studying in more regions and rangeland scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 109558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive rotational grazing is a recently proposed rangeland management strategy that has been praised by the public and media but has not been fully proven or widely accepted by rangeland ecologists. In this study, a three-year experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of intensive rotational grazing on the rangeland ecosystem in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment involved three treatments of rotational management with the same level of grazing intensity (1 sheep unit per ha in the first year and 1.3 sheep unit per ha for the next two years), including intensive rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 3–5 days), traditional rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 15 days), and continuous grazing (without livestock rotation). In addition, this experiment set up “no grazing treatment” as the reference and represents the widely used policy of “grazing forbidden”. Compared with previous studies, this study first implemented rotational grazing at a low level of grazing intensity to obey the rangeland policy of Chinese governments, which aimed to balance the forage demand of livestock and the ecosystem conservation. The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments. Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species (Leymus chinensis) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment. Intensive rotational grazing could also promote the weight gain of grazing sheep. However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland. These results indicated that intensive rotational grazing had considerable advantages in realizing the sustainable management of grazing grasslands when grazing intensity was at a relatively low level, which aims to balance plant growth and livestock production of grasslands. Furthermore, our results suggest that intensive rotational grazing is beneficial for promoting the progressive succession of degraded grasslands and providing economic revenue for local herders, thus worth studying in more regions and rangeland scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural diversification across spatial levels – A contribution to resilience and sustainability? Does Intercropping improve soil aggregation and organic carbon protection? A case-study in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean Editorial Board Landscape type and variation in landscape heterogeneity cause species turnover rather than loss in agricultural landscapes Relationship between seed predation and activity-density of carabid beetles in farmland: A meta-regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1