Facilitators and barriers to implement community engagement approaches in health promotion projects: A qualitative study in 13 projects in Spain

IF 1.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100595
Viola Cassetti , María Victoria López-Ruiz , Ana Egea-Ronda , Dory Aviñó Juan Ulpiano , Carmen Belén Benedé Azagra
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to implement community engagement approaches in health promotion projects: A qualitative study in 13 projects in Spain","authors":"Viola Cassetti ,&nbsp;María Victoria López-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Ana Egea-Ronda ,&nbsp;Dory Aviñó Juan Ulpiano ,&nbsp;Carmen Belén Benedé Azagra","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Evidence shows that community health promotion projects should be participatory. However, contextual factors affect the ways these projects can be designed and implemented. This article is part of a study to implement evidence-based guidelines to promote community engagement and it describes barriers and facilitators that can influence its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Qualitative explorative study using semi-structured interviews and interactive workshops in 13 community health promotion projects across Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and workshops with 68 participants from core working groups and key stakeholders from 13 community health projects. Descriptive thematic analysis helped identify codes related to barriers and facilitators. Data were then organized in a matrix to identify how each factor influenced each project (content analysis) and to what degree (totally, partially or absent).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen facilitators were identified, related to internal organization and strategies to work effectively; and seven barriers, related to lack of resources, dependence on external factors and not knowing how to evaluate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most of the factors identified are related to the organisation of the project, with no apparent relation with community engagement. This suggests that organisational structures should be prioritise to ensure the quality of community health promotion projects and their continuity, and to enable engagement of community members throughout a project.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522500014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Evidence shows that community health promotion projects should be participatory. However, contextual factors affect the ways these projects can be designed and implemented. This article is part of a study to implement evidence-based guidelines to promote community engagement and it describes barriers and facilitators that can influence its implementation.

Study design

Qualitative explorative study using semi-structured interviews and interactive workshops in 13 community health promotion projects across Spain.

Methods

Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and workshops with 68 participants from core working groups and key stakeholders from 13 community health projects. Descriptive thematic analysis helped identify codes related to barriers and facilitators. Data were then organized in a matrix to identify how each factor influenced each project (content analysis) and to what degree (totally, partially or absent).

Results

Fourteen facilitators were identified, related to internal organization and strategies to work effectively; and seven barriers, related to lack of resources, dependence on external factors and not knowing how to evaluate.

Conclusions

Most of the factors identified are related to the organisation of the project, with no apparent relation with community engagement. This suggests that organisational structures should be prioritise to ensure the quality of community health promotion projects and their continuity, and to enable engagement of community members throughout a project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在健康促进项目中实施社区参与方法的促进因素和障碍:对西班牙13个项目的定性研究
目的有证据表明,社区健康促进项目应具有参与性。然而,环境因素会影响这些项目的设计和实施方式。本文是一项研究的一部分,旨在实施以证据为基础的指导方针,以促进社区参与,并描述了可能影响其实施的障碍和促进因素。研究设计在西班牙13个社区健康促进项目中采用半结构化访谈和互动研讨会进行定性探索性研究。方法通过半结构化访谈和讲习班收集数据,来自13个社区卫生项目的68名核心工作组和主要利益相关者。描述性专题分析有助于确定与障碍和促进因素有关的代码。然后将数据组织在一个矩阵中,以确定每个因素如何影响每个项目(内容分析)以及影响程度(全部、部分或缺席)。结果确定了14个促进因素,涉及到内部组织和有效工作的策略;还有七个障碍,与缺乏资源、依赖外部因素和不知道如何评估有关。大多数确定的因素与项目的组织有关,与社区参与没有明显的关系。这表明应该优先考虑组织结构,以确保社区健康促进项目的质量及其连续性,并使社区成员能够参与整个项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Short and disrupted sleep is related to perceptions of neighborhood in pregnant African American women of low socioeconomic status Utilising unsupervised machine learning to predict outbreaks of respiratory tract infections in acute Irish hospitals (2016-2021) A propensity score-matched study including 250,000 patients with Factor V Leiden shows significantly increased mortality in comparison with individuals without thrombophilia How can integrated neighbourhood teams (INTs) tackle health and care inequalities? A policy evidence brief Mobilizing community assets to address health equity: Evaluation of the Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) project in Kansas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1