Dynamic risk spillover in green financial markets: A wavelet frequency analysis from China

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108301
Yiding Wang , Xiaojun Zhao , Junyan Shang
{"title":"Dynamic risk spillover in green financial markets: A wavelet frequency analysis from China","authors":"Yiding Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhao ,&nbsp;Junyan Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focuses on China's green stock market, green bond market, carbon trading market, and crude oil futures market, using return data from 2018 to 2024. By combing a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model (TVP-VAR) with the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index, the research investigates the dynamic risk spillover effects in the green financial markets. The empirical results reveal the following findings: (i) There is cyclical risk transmission across green financial markets, significantly influenced by major risk events such as the pandemic and extreme climate occurrences. (ii) The green stock market exhibits the strongest risk contagion within the green financial system, with a greater capacity for transmitting risk than receiving it. (iii) From a multiscale frequency perspective, risk contagion pathways differ notably. Weekly data show heightened sensitivity, while monthly and quarterly data provide a more robust representation of long-term systemic risk. (iv) In the short term, market sentiment significantly impacts the overall spillover effect of risk in green financial markets while the long-term effect of the fear sentiment is more significant. This research makes several contributions: it expands the cross-market view of risk contagion in green finance; introduces wavelet analysis to capture the multiscale dynamics of financial risk spillovers; and assesses the influence of market sentiment and fear sentiment on total risk spillovers in green financial markets. The findings are highly relevant for improving the structure of green financial markets, advancing regulatory innovation in green finance, and mitigating systemic financial risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108301"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on China's green stock market, green bond market, carbon trading market, and crude oil futures market, using return data from 2018 to 2024. By combing a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model (TVP-VAR) with the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index, the research investigates the dynamic risk spillover effects in the green financial markets. The empirical results reveal the following findings: (i) There is cyclical risk transmission across green financial markets, significantly influenced by major risk events such as the pandemic and extreme climate occurrences. (ii) The green stock market exhibits the strongest risk contagion within the green financial system, with a greater capacity for transmitting risk than receiving it. (iii) From a multiscale frequency perspective, risk contagion pathways differ notably. Weekly data show heightened sensitivity, while monthly and quarterly data provide a more robust representation of long-term systemic risk. (iv) In the short term, market sentiment significantly impacts the overall spillover effect of risk in green financial markets while the long-term effect of the fear sentiment is more significant. This research makes several contributions: it expands the cross-market view of risk contagion in green finance; introduces wavelet analysis to capture the multiscale dynamics of financial risk spillovers; and assesses the influence of market sentiment and fear sentiment on total risk spillovers in green financial markets. The findings are highly relevant for improving the structure of green financial markets, advancing regulatory innovation in green finance, and mitigating systemic financial risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Spillover effects between fossil energy and green markets: Evidence from informational inefficiency” [Energy EconomicsVolume 131, March 2024, 107317] Household benefits from energy efficiency retrofits: Implications for net zero housing policy Dynamic risk spillover in green financial markets: A wavelet frequency analysis from China Dissecting the financial impact of climate risk Erratum to “On the performance of the United States nuclear power sector: A Bayesian approach” [Energy Economics Volume 125, September 2023, 106,884].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1