Dynamic risk spillover in green financial markets: A wavelet frequency analysis from China

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108301
Yiding Wang , Xiaojun Zhao , Junyan Shang
{"title":"Dynamic risk spillover in green financial markets: A wavelet frequency analysis from China","authors":"Yiding Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhao ,&nbsp;Junyan Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focuses on China's green stock market, green bond market, carbon trading market, and crude oil futures market, using return data from 2018 to 2024. By combing a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model (TVP-VAR) with the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index, the research investigates the dynamic risk spillover effects in the green financial markets. The empirical results reveal the following findings: (i) There is cyclical risk transmission across green financial markets, significantly influenced by major risk events such as the pandemic and extreme climate occurrences. (ii) The green stock market exhibits the strongest risk contagion within the green financial system, with a greater capacity for transmitting risk than receiving it. (iii) From a multiscale frequency perspective, risk contagion pathways differ notably. Weekly data show heightened sensitivity, while monthly and quarterly data provide a more robust representation of long-term systemic risk. (iv) In the short term, market sentiment significantly impacts the overall spillover effect of risk in green financial markets while the long-term effect of the fear sentiment is more significant. This research makes several contributions: it expands the cross-market view of risk contagion in green finance; introduces wavelet analysis to capture the multiscale dynamics of financial risk spillovers; and assesses the influence of market sentiment and fear sentiment on total risk spillovers in green financial markets. The findings are highly relevant for improving the structure of green financial markets, advancing regulatory innovation in green finance, and mitigating systemic financial risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108301"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on China's green stock market, green bond market, carbon trading market, and crude oil futures market, using return data from 2018 to 2024. By combing a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model (TVP-VAR) with the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index, the research investigates the dynamic risk spillover effects in the green financial markets. The empirical results reveal the following findings: (i) There is cyclical risk transmission across green financial markets, significantly influenced by major risk events such as the pandemic and extreme climate occurrences. (ii) The green stock market exhibits the strongest risk contagion within the green financial system, with a greater capacity for transmitting risk than receiving it. (iii) From a multiscale frequency perspective, risk contagion pathways differ notably. Weekly data show heightened sensitivity, while monthly and quarterly data provide a more robust representation of long-term systemic risk. (iv) In the short term, market sentiment significantly impacts the overall spillover effect of risk in green financial markets while the long-term effect of the fear sentiment is more significant. This research makes several contributions: it expands the cross-market view of risk contagion in green finance; introduces wavelet analysis to capture the multiscale dynamics of financial risk spillovers; and assesses the influence of market sentiment and fear sentiment on total risk spillovers in green financial markets. The findings are highly relevant for improving the structure of green financial markets, advancing regulatory innovation in green finance, and mitigating systemic financial risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色金融市场的动态风险溢出:基于中国的小波频率分析
本文以中国绿色股票市场、绿色债券市场、碳交易市场和原油期货市场为研究对象,采用2018 - 2024年的收益率数据。通过结合时变参数向量自回归模型(TVP-VAR)和Diebold-Yilmaz溢出指数,研究绿色金融市场的动态风险溢出效应。实证结果揭示了以下发现:(i)绿色金融市场存在周期性风险传导,受到大流行和极端气候事件等重大风险事件的显著影响。(2)绿色股票市场在绿色金融体系内表现出最强的风险传染能力,其传导风险的能力大于接受风险的能力。(iii)从多尺度频率的角度来看,风险传染途径存在显著差异。每周数据显示出更高的敏感性,而月度和季度数据提供了更有力的长期系统性风险代表。(四)市场情绪在短期内显著影响绿色金融市场风险的整体溢出效应,而恐惧情绪的长期影响更为显著。本文的研究有以下几点贡献:拓展了绿色金融风险传染的跨市场视角;引入小波分析,捕捉金融风险溢出的多尺度动态;评估了市场情绪和恐惧情绪对绿色金融市场总风险溢出的影响。研究结果对优化绿色金融市场结构、推进绿色金融监管创新、缓解系统性金融风险具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Sticky growth, sticky carbon: Bayesian joint modelling evidence on a growth-carbon lock-in in emerging economies Assessing Rwanda’s National electrification strategy: Impact and trade-offs Do financial technology and clean bonds reshape risk spillovers in sectoral equity markets? A quantile-based assessment using the US case Identifying utility maximizers and regret minimizers in zero-energy house adoption by using individual-specific heterogeneous alternative decision rules Are sovereign debts sustainable under energy transition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1