The B2B sharing economy: Framework, implications, and future research

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115244
Sabine Benoit , Katrin Merfeld , Vivian S.C. Tunn , Tobias Schaefers , Tor Wallin Andreassen
{"title":"The B2B sharing economy: Framework, implications, and future research","authors":"Sabine Benoit ,&nbsp;Katrin Merfeld ,&nbsp;Vivian S.C. Tunn ,&nbsp;Tobias Schaefers ,&nbsp;Tor Wallin Andreassen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sharing economy (SE) has disrupted several sectors. Thus far, this has mainly occurred in consumer markets. Research has therefore focused on these sectors, leaving a research gap regarding the emergence of the SE in business-to-business (B2B) markets. We address this gap by first developing a literature-based framework defining the B2B SE as a <em>service system composed of at least three actors (triadic + ), including an asset-light, intermediating platform that links at least two organizations, with one paying for temporary access to a physical asset from the other organization, for which granting this access is an ancillary service outside of the core business</em>. We also delineate the B2B SE from related concepts, such as cooperatives and co-owning. Second, we provide managerial implications for platforms, incumbents, asset owners, and policymakers. Third, we outline areas for future research, for example, disruption trajectories, incumbent reactions, and the dark side of the B2B SE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 115244"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sharing economy (SE) has disrupted several sectors. Thus far, this has mainly occurred in consumer markets. Research has therefore focused on these sectors, leaving a research gap regarding the emergence of the SE in business-to-business (B2B) markets. We address this gap by first developing a literature-based framework defining the B2B SE as a service system composed of at least three actors (triadic + ), including an asset-light, intermediating platform that links at least two organizations, with one paying for temporary access to a physical asset from the other organization, for which granting this access is an ancillary service outside of the core business. We also delineate the B2B SE from related concepts, such as cooperatives and co-owning. Second, we provide managerial implications for platforms, incumbents, asset owners, and policymakers. Third, we outline areas for future research, for example, disruption trajectories, incumbent reactions, and the dark side of the B2B SE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B2B共享经济:框架、影响和未来研究
共享经济(SE)已经颠覆了多个行业。到目前为止,这主要发生在消费市场。因此,研究主要集中在这些领域,留下了关于企业对企业(B2B)市场中SE出现的研究空白。我们首先通过开发一个基于文献的框架来解决这一差距,该框架将B2B SE定义为一个由至少三个参与者(三元+)组成的服务系统,包括一个轻资产的中介平台,该平台连接至少两个组织,其中一个组织支付对另一个组织的物理资产的临时访问权限,对其授予此访问权限是核心业务之外的辅助服务。我们还从相关概念(如合作社和共同拥有)描述了B2B SE。其次,我们为平台、在位者、资产所有者和政策制定者提供了管理启示。第三,我们概述了未来研究的领域,例如,中断轨迹、现任者的反应和B2B SE的阴暗面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1