Learning through experiments: The case of low-traffic neighborhoods in London

IF 6.1 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100107
Katherine VanHoose , Luca Bertolini , Thomas Straatemeier
{"title":"Learning through experiments: The case of low-traffic neighborhoods in London","authors":"Katherine VanHoose ,&nbsp;Luca Bertolini ,&nbsp;Thomas Straatemeier","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>City street experiments have proven to possess a capacity to trigger system change in urban mobility. The role that learning plays during this process remains unexplored. Drawing from transition studies and experiential learning theory, this paper focuses on the learning of local government actors involved in street experiments. The paper explores how these actors learn, with whom they learn and what they learn. Two cases of low-traffic neighborhood experiment programs in London reveal how local government actors gain instrumental knowledge concerning the design and implementation of street experiments and how to effectively engage citizens. Transformative knowledge amongst local government actors was observed less, revealing an important consideration for the role experiments play in transitions. Because street experiments reflect the complexity of ‘real-life’ and automatically include participants, they are prone to conflict, which can provide increased opportunities for learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

City street experiments have proven to possess a capacity to trigger system change in urban mobility. The role that learning plays during this process remains unexplored. Drawing from transition studies and experiential learning theory, this paper focuses on the learning of local government actors involved in street experiments. The paper explores how these actors learn, with whom they learn and what they learn. Two cases of low-traffic neighborhood experiment programs in London reveal how local government actors gain instrumental knowledge concerning the design and implementation of street experiments and how to effectively engage citizens. Transformative knowledge amongst local government actors was observed less, revealing an important consideration for the role experiments play in transitions. Because street experiments reflect the complexity of ‘real-life’ and automatically include participants, they are prone to conflict, which can provide increased opportunities for learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从实验中学习:伦敦低交通街区的案例
城市街道实验已被证明具有触发城市交通系统变化的能力。学习在这一过程中扮演的角色仍未被探索。本文借鉴转型研究和体验学习理论,重点研究参与街头实验的地方政府行为体的学习。本文探讨了这些参与者如何学习,与谁一起学习以及学习什么。伦敦低交通街区实验项目的两个案例揭示了地方政府行为者如何获得关于街道实验设计和实施的有用知识,以及如何有效地吸引公民参与。对地方政府行为者的变革知识观察较少,揭示了实验在转型中所起作用的重要考虑因素。由于街头实验反映了“现实生活”的复杂性,并且自动包含参与者,因此它们容易发生冲突,这可以提供更多的学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
More than just a station forecourt? Exploring experiences, activities and wayfinding around public transport stations using ‘digital Tactical Urbanism’ Can spatial indicators fully explain car dependence? Evidence from Lombardy (Italy) Barriers to autonomous vehicles adoption in Europe: Insights from literature and interviews Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas – analysis of user motivations, ridership, and side effects of an app-based demand-responsive transit An approach to measure walkability integrating individual walking decision and service facility preference: Community-wide study of Chongqing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1