Bond strength of a 3-step total-etch bonding system to dentine – An improved approach

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental Materials Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2025.02.007
H. Hassan Elnadif, W. Palin, M.A. Hadis, B.W. Darvell
{"title":"Bond strength of a 3-step total-etch bonding system to dentine – An improved approach","authors":"H. Hassan Elnadif,&nbsp;W. Palin,&nbsp;M.A. Hadis,&nbsp;B.W. Darvell","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generally, the bonding of one material to another is important for function, and especially in so-called ‘adhesive dentistry’. However, there are concerns about the clinical relevance and the discriminatory power of currently employed tests of bond strength.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Develop and validate a test protocol based on 4-point bending that may be used to examine the bonding of various dental materials to a range of substrates. The bonding of a resin-based composite (RBC) to dentine is taken as an example.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Slices of dentine ‘coupons’ (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼4–6 mm<sup>3</sup>) from extracted molars were prepared using a diamond saw under running water. Pairs of RBC bars (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼24 mm<sup>3</sup>) (Z250) were bonded symmetrically either side of a dentine coupon using all combinations of the following treatments: E: acid-etched (Scotchbond Universal Etchant), P: primer (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive); A: adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer) (all 3 M) as well as N: no treatment. Following retrieval from the mould, test pieces were immediately subjected to 4-point bending at 23 °C, cross-head speed 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. Three-way analysis of variance on log(flexural strength): etch × primer × adhesive, was applied. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine fracture surfaces and identify failure origins.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Flexural strengths in MPa: N: 1.38 ± 0.56; P: 9.82 ± 0.89; A: 5.12 ± 0.73; E: 9.39 ± 1.78; E + P: 21.03 ± 2.63; E + A: 12.80 ± 1.53; P + A: 17.16 ± 3.03; E + P + A: 20.84 ± 3.93. The treatment main effects (all, p &lt; 10<sup>−12</sup>) were not additive, there being significant two-way (p &lt; 10<sup>−5</sup>) and three-way (p = 0.037) interactions. There was no significant difference between E + P + A and E + P (p = 0.86).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With good reproducibility (low scatter), discriminatory power (clear treatment effects), economy with regard to substrates, the method has the potential to be adaptable to many systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 483-494"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564125001320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Generally, the bonding of one material to another is important for function, and especially in so-called ‘adhesive dentistry’. However, there are concerns about the clinical relevance and the discriminatory power of currently employed tests of bond strength.

Objective

Develop and validate a test protocol based on 4-point bending that may be used to examine the bonding of various dental materials to a range of substrates. The bonding of a resin-based composite (RBC) to dentine is taken as an example.

Methods

Slices of dentine ‘coupons’ (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼4–6 mm3) from extracted molars were prepared using a diamond saw under running water. Pairs of RBC bars (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼24 mm3) (Z250) were bonded symmetrically either side of a dentine coupon using all combinations of the following treatments: E: acid-etched (Scotchbond Universal Etchant), P: primer (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive); A: adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer) (all 3 M) as well as N: no treatment. Following retrieval from the mould, test pieces were immediately subjected to 4-point bending at 23 °C, cross-head speed 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. Three-way analysis of variance on log(flexural strength): etch × primer × adhesive, was applied. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine fracture surfaces and identify failure origins.

Results

Flexural strengths in MPa: N: 1.38 ± 0.56; P: 9.82 ± 0.89; A: 5.12 ± 0.73; E: 9.39 ± 1.78; E + P: 21.03 ± 2.63; E + A: 12.80 ± 1.53; P + A: 17.16 ± 3.03; E + P + A: 20.84 ± 3.93. The treatment main effects (all, p < 10−12) were not additive, there being significant two-way (p < 10−5) and three-way (p = 0.037) interactions. There was no significant difference between E + P + A and E + P (p = 0.86).

Conclusion

With good reproducibility (low scatter), discriminatory power (clear treatment effects), economy with regard to substrates, the method has the potential to be adaptable to many systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三步全蚀刻系统与牙本质的结合强度-一种改进方法。
背景:一般来说,一种材料与另一种材料的粘合对功能很重要,特别是在所谓的“粘合剂牙科”中。然而,人们对目前使用的粘结强度测试的临床相关性和歧视性存在担忧。目的:开发和验证基于四点弯曲的测试方案,可用于检查各种牙科材料与一系列基质的结合。以树脂基复合材料(RBC)与牙本质的结合为例。方法:用金刚石锯在流水下制备牙本质“薄片”(5.0 × 2.0 × ~ 4-6 mm3)。对RBC条(5.0 × 2.0 × ~ 24 mm3) (Z250)使用以下处理的所有组合对称地粘合在牙质券的两侧:E:酸蚀(Scotchbond通用蚀刻剂),P:底漆(Adper Scotchbond多用途粘合剂);A:粘合剂(Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer)(全部3 M)以及N:未经处理。从模具中取出后,试件立即在23°C下进行4点弯曲,交叉速度0.5 mm/min,直到断裂。原木(抗弯强度)的三向方差分析:蚀刻剂× 底漆× 粘合剂。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查断口表面并确定失效原因。结果:抗弯强度MPa: N: 1.38 ± 0.56;P: 9.82 ± 0.89;答:5.12 ± 0.73;艾凡:9.39 ± 1.78;E + P: 21.03 ± 2.63;E + :12.80 ± 1.53;P + :17.16 ± 3.03; E + P  + 答: 20.84±3.93 。治疗主效应(均p -12)不具有相加性,存在显著的双向(p -5)和三方(p = 0.037)相互作用。E + P + A与E + P差异无统计学意义(P = 0.86)。结论:该方法具有重现性好(散射小)、鉴别力强(处理效果清晰)、对底物经济等特点,具有适用于多种体系的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
期刊最新文献
What is in a name? Let us not confuse self-adhesive resin composites, RMGICs or compomers! Structural analysis of a collagen-fibrin scaffold which promotes osteogenic differentiation and templated biomineralization of dental pulp stem cells. Effect of delayed modulus formation on shrinkage stress development in dental resin composites: A theoretical treatment. Optimised clinical protocol for root canal obturation using single cone and hydraulic cement sealer. Filler amount influences long-term mechanical stability of experimental dental composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1