The impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07301-z
Yujie Tang, Liang Chen, Tao Han, Cuixia Hu, Pan Li, Jing Tang, Aiyuan Li, Xianglian Peng, Jie Zhang
{"title":"The impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women: a single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yujie Tang, Liang Chen, Tao Han, Cuixia Hu, Pan Li, Jing Tang, Aiyuan Li, Xianglian Peng, Jie Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07301-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnant women have an adverse impact on perinatal outcomes, including cesarean section, preterm birth, fetal distress. However, it's uncertain whether these adverse consequences are caused by previous SARS-COV-2 infection during pregnancy or acute infection at the time of delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study among pregnant women with singleton pregnancy who delivered between 1 December 2022 and 1 February 2023 (n = 2472). Pregnancies were divided into three groups: non-infected group, acute SARS-CoV-2 infection group, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection group based on PCR or antigen test. The clinical data for mothers and neonates came from medical records on internal healthcare system. Follow-up time spanned from admission to discharge. We investigated the impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcome. Multivariable logistic models were used to assess the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnant women with acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the non-infected pregnant women, acute SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women had significant higher rates of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) (26 women [4.4%] vs. 8 women [1.0%]; aOR, 4.9 [95% CI, 2.2-11.0]; P < 0.001), preterm birth (<37 wk) (53women [9.0%] vs. 45 women [5.7%]; aOR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.7]; P < 0.05), fetal distress(106 women [18.1%] vs. 82 women [10.4%]; aOR,1.9 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6]; P < 0.01), primary cesarean delivery (216 women [36.9%] vs. 239women [30.3%]; aOR, 1.4[95% CI, 1.1-1.8]; P < 0.01) and neonatal unit admission (69 neonates [12%] vs. 64 neonates [8.3%]; aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]; P < 0.05), prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with an increased risk of ICP (40 women [3.7%] vs. 8 women [1.0%]; aOR, 3.9 [95% CI, 1.8-8.5]; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnant women at delivery with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with higher risk of ICP, preterm birth, fetal distress, primary cesarean delivery and neonatal unit admission. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was associated with higher risk ICP. These findings emphasize the need for optimization of strategies for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, especially for acute infection at delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07301-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnant women have an adverse impact on perinatal outcomes, including cesarean section, preterm birth, fetal distress. However, it's uncertain whether these adverse consequences are caused by previous SARS-COV-2 infection during pregnancy or acute infection at the time of delivery.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study among pregnant women with singleton pregnancy who delivered between 1 December 2022 and 1 February 2023 (n = 2472). Pregnancies were divided into three groups: non-infected group, acute SARS-CoV-2 infection group, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection group based on PCR or antigen test. The clinical data for mothers and neonates came from medical records on internal healthcare system. Follow-up time spanned from admission to discharge. We investigated the impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcome. Multivariable logistic models were used to assess the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnant women with acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results: Compared to the non-infected pregnant women, acute SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women had significant higher rates of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) (26 women [4.4%] vs. 8 women [1.0%]; aOR, 4.9 [95% CI, 2.2-11.0]; P < 0.001), preterm birth (<37 wk) (53women [9.0%] vs. 45 women [5.7%]; aOR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.7]; P < 0.05), fetal distress(106 women [18.1%] vs. 82 women [10.4%]; aOR,1.9 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6]; P < 0.01), primary cesarean delivery (216 women [36.9%] vs. 239women [30.3%]; aOR, 1.4[95% CI, 1.1-1.8]; P < 0.01) and neonatal unit admission (69 neonates [12%] vs. 64 neonates [8.3%]; aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]; P < 0.05), prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with an increased risk of ICP (40 women [3.7%] vs. 8 women [1.0%]; aOR, 3.9 [95% CI, 1.8-8.5]; P <0.001).

Conclusions: Pregnant women at delivery with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with higher risk of ICP, preterm birth, fetal distress, primary cesarean delivery and neonatal unit admission. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was associated with higher risk ICP. These findings emphasize the need for optimization of strategies for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, especially for acute infection at delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性和既往SARS-CoV-2感染对孕妇孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
背景:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染孕妇对围产儿结局有不利影响,包括剖宫产、早产、胎儿窘迫。然而,目前还不确定这些不良后果是由怀孕期间的SARS-COV-2感染引起的,还是由分娩时的急性感染引起的。方法:我们对2022年12月1日至2023年2月1日分娩的单胎妊娠孕妇进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究(n = 2472)。根据PCR或抗原检测将妊娠分为未感染组、急性SARS-CoV-2感染组和既往感染组。母亲和新生儿的临床资料来源于内部医疗保健系统的病历。随访时间从入院到出院。我们调查了急性和既往SARS-CoV-2感染对孕产妇和新生儿预后的影响。采用多变量logistic模型评估急性和既往SARS-CoV-2感染孕妇不良围产期结局的风险。结果:急性SARS-CoV-2感染孕妇妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积(ICP)发生率显著高于未感染孕妇(26例[4.4%]∶8例[1.0%];aOR为4.9 [95% CI, 2.2 ~ 11.0];结论:急性SARS-CoV-2感染分娩的孕妇发生ICP、早产、胎儿窘迫、初次剖宫产和新生儿住院的风险较高。妊娠期感染SARS-CoV-2与ICP高风险相关。这些发现强调有必要优化预防孕妇SARS-CoV-2感染的策略,特别是预防分娩时的急性感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Effect of pregnancy pillow used in the last trimester on sleep and comfort: randomized controlled study. Dose-response relationship between early pregnancy blood pressure and gestational diabetes mellitus based on propensity score matching: a retrospective study. The trends of congenital heart defects burden in BRICS-plus from 1990 to 2021 and its projection to 2035. Partners' childbirth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic - findings from the Swedish COPE prospective cohort study. Enhancing expertise in management of gestational diabetes mellitus: protocol for development of structured curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1