Assessing employee silence about patient safety and its association with environmental factors among nurses in Ardabil: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12426-0
Maryam Hashemian, Masoumeh Aghamohammadi, Sohrab Iranpour, Aghil Habibi Soola
{"title":"Assessing employee silence about patient safety and its association with environmental factors among nurses in Ardabil: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Maryam Hashemian, Masoumeh Aghamohammadi, Sohrab Iranpour, Aghil Habibi Soola","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12426-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses have a crucial role in recognizing potential dangers to patient safety during direct patient care. However, there are occasions when they opt to stay quiet instead of voicing their concerns, ultimately endangering patients. The underlying reasons for this silence pose a significant challenge in the nursing industry. While it's known that workplace conditions contribute to this silence, the specific ways in which this occurs need to be clarified. This research aimed to investigate the factors that lead nurses to remain silent about patient safety, specifically focusing on environmental influences in Ardabil City.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and analytical study examined 630 nurses, including head nurses, from five medical training centers in Ardabil, northwest Iran. The primary instruments used in the research included the Employee Silence about Patient Safety Questionnaire, the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), measures of psychological safety, leader-member exchange (LMX) assessments, and evaluations of professional discrimination. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0, applying descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and hierarchical regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average score for employee silence regarding patient safety was 2.62, with a standard deviation of 0.98. Several factors were found to be significant predictors of employees' silence about patient safety, including nurse participation in hospital affairs (ß = 0.196, p = 0.002), nurse's role in the quality of care (ß = -0.352, p < 0.001), staff and facility adequacy (ß = 0.156, p = 0.001), communication with the physician (ß = -0.105, p = 0.015), LMX (ß = -0.284, p < 0.001), and job position (ß = -0.093, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has identified several critical factors influencing employee silence regarding patient safety, including nurse involvement in hospital decision-making, the quality of care, communication with physicians, and job positions. To address these challenges, healthcare organizations must implement standardized protocols, improved communication channels, regular safety training, and the integration of advanced technologies. Increasing nurse participation in decision-making processes and strengthening communication between nursing staff and physicians can foster a culture of openness that encourages employees to voice their safety concerns. By creating an environment where staff feel supported and empowered to speak up, healthcare facilities can enhance patient safety and improve overall care quality, ultimately leading to a safer working environment for healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12426-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses have a crucial role in recognizing potential dangers to patient safety during direct patient care. However, there are occasions when they opt to stay quiet instead of voicing their concerns, ultimately endangering patients. The underlying reasons for this silence pose a significant challenge in the nursing industry. While it's known that workplace conditions contribute to this silence, the specific ways in which this occurs need to be clarified. This research aimed to investigate the factors that lead nurses to remain silent about patient safety, specifically focusing on environmental influences in Ardabil City.

Methods: This descriptive and analytical study examined 630 nurses, including head nurses, from five medical training centers in Ardabil, northwest Iran. The primary instruments used in the research included the Employee Silence about Patient Safety Questionnaire, the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), measures of psychological safety, leader-member exchange (LMX) assessments, and evaluations of professional discrimination. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0, applying descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and hierarchical regression analysis.

Results: The average score for employee silence regarding patient safety was 2.62, with a standard deviation of 0.98. Several factors were found to be significant predictors of employees' silence about patient safety, including nurse participation in hospital affairs (ß = 0.196, p = 0.002), nurse's role in the quality of care (ß = -0.352, p < 0.001), staff and facility adequacy (ß = 0.156, p = 0.001), communication with the physician (ß = -0.105, p = 0.015), LMX (ß = -0.284, p < 0.001), and job position (ß = -0.093, p = 0.018).

Conclusion: This study has identified several critical factors influencing employee silence regarding patient safety, including nurse involvement in hospital decision-making, the quality of care, communication with physicians, and job positions. To address these challenges, healthcare organizations must implement standardized protocols, improved communication channels, regular safety training, and the integration of advanced technologies. Increasing nurse participation in decision-making processes and strengthening communication between nursing staff and physicians can foster a culture of openness that encourages employees to voice their safety concerns. By creating an environment where staff feel supported and empowered to speak up, healthcare facilities can enhance patient safety and improve overall care quality, ultimately leading to a safer working environment for healthcare professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估阿达比尔护士对患者安全的沉默及其与环境因素的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:护士在直接护理病人过程中,在识别病人安全的潜在危险方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,在某些情况下,他们选择保持沉默而不是表达他们的担忧,最终危及患者。这种沉默的潜在原因对护理行业构成了重大挑战。虽然我们知道工作环境是导致沉默的原因,但需要澄清这种情况发生的具体方式。本研究旨在调查导致护士对患者安全保持沉默的因素,特别关注阿达比尔市的环境影响。方法:这项描述性和分析性研究调查了来自伊朗西北部阿达比尔五个医疗培训中心的630名护士,包括护士长。研究使用的主要工具包括员工对患者安全沉默问卷、护理工作指数实践环境量表、心理安全测量、领导-成员交换(LMX)评估和专业歧视评估。数据分析采用SPSS 16.0版本,采用描述性统计、t检验、方差分析、Pearson相关系数和层次回归分析。结果:员工对患者安全沉默的平均得分为2.62,标准差为0.98。研究发现,护士对医院事务的参与(ß = 0.196, p = 0.002)、护士在护理质量中的作用(ß = -0.352, p)是员工对患者安全沉默的显著预测因子。结论:本研究确定了影响员工对患者安全沉默的几个关键因素,包括护士对医院决策的参与、护理质量、与医生的沟通和工作岗位。为了应对这些挑战,医疗保健组织必须实施标准化协议、改进通信渠道、定期安全培训和集成先进技术。增加护士对决策过程的参与,加强护理人员和医生之间的沟通,可以培养一种开放的文化,鼓励员工表达他们对安全的担忧。通过创造一种让员工感到得到支持并有权畅所欲言的环境,医疗保健机构可以增强患者的安全性,提高整体护理质量,最终为医疗保健专业人员创造更安全的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
A framework policy analysis of single-dose HPV vaccination adoption in East Africa: a rapid review. Psychosocial and health-related determinants of self-reported unmet healthcare needs in Türkiye: evidence from a nation-wide survey. From heatwaves to power shifts: the hidden links between climate shocks, health access, and attitude toward coups in Africa. Lifetime medical costs of chronic hepatitis C in the United States. Changes in older employees' willingness to utilise digital health promotion and prevention programmes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1