Shared practices among primary health care workers: A time-motion study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12439-9
Talita Rewa, Geisa Colebrusco de Souza Gonçalves, Andrea Liliana Vesga Varela, Valéria Marli Leonello, Marina Peduzzi, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida, Lorrayne Belotti, Debora Bernardo da Silva, Daiana Bonfim
{"title":"Shared practices among primary health care workers: A time-motion study.","authors":"Talita Rewa, Geisa Colebrusco de Souza Gonçalves, Andrea Liliana Vesga Varela, Valéria Marli Leonello, Marina Peduzzi, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida, Lorrayne Belotti, Debora Bernardo da Silva, Daiana Bonfim","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12439-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared activities by health workers in meeting health needs are crucial to improve the health population, patient experience, quality of life of health teams members and the effectiveness of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the activities shared by Primary Health Care (PHC) team workers, whether multiprofessional or uniprofessional.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive study was, thus, carried out, based on the time-motion technique, in São Paulo-Brazil. Data collection was carried out from 2021 to 2022, through direct observations of workers, family health teams (FHT), oral health teams (OHT) and multiprofessional teams (MultiT). The frequency rates of both activities and time of shared practices and the distribution of workers involved in information exchanges were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 workers were observed, recording 21,936 activities (157,653 minutes). Of these, 72.90% were individual activities and 27.10%, shared (36.1% uni-professional and 63.9% multiprofessional). Shared activities represented 26.26% of the time. Dentists presented 60.8% of their activities in the shared modality, uni-professionally (99.26%). Concerning FHT, nurses were most dedicated to shared practices (33.09%) and exchanged information the most with others. According to team practices, the greatest amount of time dedicated to shared practices was spent by FHT (80%), followed by MultiT (71%) and OHT (65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiprofessional work in PHC is evident as a precursor to interprofessional practice. In this sense, studies and reflections on the way in which PHC indicators have been monitored and evaluated, which mainly refer to individual activities, are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12439-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared activities by health workers in meeting health needs are crucial to improve the health population, patient experience, quality of life of health teams members and the effectiveness of care.

Objective: To identify the activities shared by Primary Health Care (PHC) team workers, whether multiprofessional or uniprofessional.

Method: A descriptive study was, thus, carried out, based on the time-motion technique, in São Paulo-Brazil. Data collection was carried out from 2021 to 2022, through direct observations of workers, family health teams (FHT), oral health teams (OHT) and multiprofessional teams (MultiT). The frequency rates of both activities and time of shared practices and the distribution of workers involved in information exchanges were considered.

Results: A total of 93 workers were observed, recording 21,936 activities (157,653 minutes). Of these, 72.90% were individual activities and 27.10%, shared (36.1% uni-professional and 63.9% multiprofessional). Shared activities represented 26.26% of the time. Dentists presented 60.8% of their activities in the shared modality, uni-professionally (99.26%). Concerning FHT, nurses were most dedicated to shared practices (33.09%) and exchanged information the most with others. According to team practices, the greatest amount of time dedicated to shared practices was spent by FHT (80%), followed by MultiT (71%) and OHT (65%).

Conclusion: Multiprofessional work in PHC is evident as a precursor to interprofessional practice. In this sense, studies and reflections on the way in which PHC indicators have been monitored and evaluated, which mainly refer to individual activities, are required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级卫生保健工作者的共同做法:一项时间运动研究。
背景:卫生工作者在满足卫生需求方面的共同活动对于改善健康人群、患者体验、卫生工作队成员的生活质量和护理效果至关重要。目的:了解初级卫生保健(PHC)团队工作人员(包括多专业人员和非专业人员)共同参与的活动。方法:因此,在巴西圣保罗进行了一项基于时间运动技术的描述性研究。通过对工人、家庭卫生小组(FHT)、口腔卫生小组(OHT)和多专业小组(MultiT)的直接观察,从2021年至2022年进行了数据收集。审议了共同实践的活动频率和时间以及参与信息交流的工作人员的分布情况。结果:共观察了93名工人,记录了21,936次活动(157,653分钟)。其中,72.90%为个体活动,27.10%为共享活动(36.1%为单专业活动,63.9%为多专业活动)。共享活动占26.26%的时间。牙医的活动中有60.8%为共享模式,非专业模式占99.26%。在FHT方面,护士最愿意分享经验(33.09%),最愿意与他人交流信息。根据团队实践,FHT花在共享实践上的时间最多(80%),其次是MultiT(71%)和OHT(65%)。结论:PHC的多专业工作显然是跨专业实践的先驱。从这个意义上说,需要研究和思考监测和评价初级保健指标的方式,这些指标主要是指个别活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Recent research on rehabilitation interventions for post-stroke gait and balance in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Predictors of migration intentions among Turkish physicians: a lasso logistic regression approach. Adapting the WHO ICOPE framework to design an integrated frailty and intrinsic capacity management community-based programme in Singapore: a programme description using the updated and modified TIDieR checklist. Heterogeneity in nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis. Mapping multidomain assessment tools for home-visit nursing and rehabilitation: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1