Cost-effectiveness analysis of tandem mass spectrometry compared to fluorescence analysis for screening neonatal genetic metabolic diseases.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12419-z
Shanyan Zhou, Dunming Xiao, Zhen Huang, Junling Weng, Bingxing Luo, Yingyao Chen
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of tandem mass spectrometry compared to fluorescence analysis for screening neonatal genetic metabolic diseases.","authors":"Shanyan Zhou, Dunming Xiao, Zhen Huang, Junling Weng, Bingxing Luo, Yingyao Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12419-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) screening for neonatal inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) with fluorescence analysis (FA) screening for neonatal inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and provide evidence for promoting MS/MS in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Excel-based decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MS/MS versus FA screening from a societal perspective. The model simulated the screening pathway, prevention, and treatment of IMDs, adjusted to 2023 price levels. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with a 3% annual discount rate applied. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at one times the per-capita GDP of China in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MS/MS screening was more costly (CNY 1,121,637; USD 158,423 vs. CNY 380,276; USD 53,711) but more effective (16.47 QALYs vs. 5.93 QALYs) than FA screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CNY 70,286 (USD 9,927) per QALY, below the WTP threshold. The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was 1:3.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While MS/MS screening incurs higher costs, it achieves significantly greater QALY gains and demonstrates favorable cost-effectiveness and economic benefits. MS/MS screening should be actively promoted for neonatal IMDs in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12419-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) screening for neonatal inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) with fluorescence analysis (FA) screening for neonatal inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) and provide evidence for promoting MS/MS in China.

Methods: An Excel-based decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MS/MS versus FA screening from a societal perspective. The model simulated the screening pathway, prevention, and treatment of IMDs, adjusted to 2023 price levels. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with a 3% annual discount rate applied. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at one times the per-capita GDP of China in 2023.

Results: MS/MS screening was more costly (CNY 1,121,637; USD 158,423 vs. CNY 380,276; USD 53,711) but more effective (16.47 QALYs vs. 5.93 QALYs) than FA screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CNY 70,286 (USD 9,927) per QALY, below the WTP threshold. The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was 1:3.94.

Conclusion: While MS/MS screening incurs higher costs, it achieves significantly greater QALY gains and demonstrates favorable cost-effectiveness and economic benefits. MS/MS screening should be actively promoted for neonatal IMDs in China.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
串联质谱与荧光分析筛查新生儿遗传代谢疾病的成本-效果分析
目的:比较串联质谱(MS/MS)筛查新生儿遗传代谢性疾病(IMDs)与荧光分析(FA)筛查新生儿遗传代谢性疾病(IMDs)的成本-效果,为在中国推广MS/MS提供依据。方法:构建基于excel的决策树模型,从社会角度评价MS/MS与FA筛选的成本-效果。该模型模拟了imd的筛选途径、预防和治疗,调整到2023年的价格水平。以质量调整生命年(QALYs)衡量健康结果,采用3%的年贴现率。2023年,支付意愿(WTP)门槛设定为中国人均GDP的1倍。结果:MS/MS筛查成本较高(1,121,637元;158,423美元对380,276元;53,711美元),但比FA筛查更有效(16.47 QALYs对5.93 QALYs)。增量成本效益比(ICER)为每个QALY 70,286元(9,927美元),低于WTP阈值。效益成本比(BCR)为1:3.94。结论:MS/MS筛查成本较高,但QALY收益明显较高,具有较好的成本效益和经济效益。在中国应积极推广MS/MS筛查新生儿imd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Recent research on rehabilitation interventions for post-stroke gait and balance in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Predictors of migration intentions among Turkish physicians: a lasso logistic regression approach. Adapting the WHO ICOPE framework to design an integrated frailty and intrinsic capacity management community-based programme in Singapore: a programme description using the updated and modified TIDieR checklist. Heterogeneity in nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis. Mapping multidomain assessment tools for home-visit nursing and rehabilitation: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1