Residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States, 2010-2018.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424
Eduardo J Santiago-Rodriguez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Zinzi D Bailey, Justin S White, Isabel E Allen, Robert A Hiatt
{"title":"Residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States, 2010-2018.","authors":"Eduardo J Santiago-Rodriguez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Zinzi D Bailey, Justin S White, Isabel E Allen, Robert A Hiatt","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily due to disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the US, and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Restricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain CRC screening adherence per USPSTF recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity, and weighted to represent the US population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cross-sectional study (n=44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower CRC screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties (Q1 vs Q5, OR [95% CI]: ICE income, 0.77 [0.70-0.86]; ICE race, 0.86 [0.77-0.96]; ICE race+income, 0.75 [0.67-0.84]. In race and ethnicity stratified analyses, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people, and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, CRC screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residential segregation was associated with CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Interventions aimed at improving CRC screening uptake in the US should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups, and how features of residential segregation might diferentially affect racial and ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily due to disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the US, and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.

Methods: Restricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain CRC screening adherence per USPSTF recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity, and weighted to represent the US population.

Results: In this cross-sectional study (n=44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower CRC screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties (Q1 vs Q5, OR [95% CI]: ICE income, 0.77 [0.70-0.86]; ICE race, 0.86 [0.77-0.96]; ICE race+income, 0.75 [0.67-0.84]. In race and ethnicity stratified analyses, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people, and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, CRC screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.

Conclusions: Residential segregation was associated with CRC screening.

Impact: Interventions aimed at improving CRC screening uptake in the US should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups, and how features of residential segregation might diferentially affect racial and ethnic groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers of toxicant exposure among youth in Canada, England and the United States who vape and/or smoke tobacco or do neither. Association of genetic liability to allergic diseases with overall and early-onset colorectal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study. Novel non-invasive tests for colorectal cancer screening - A cost-effectiveness analysis. Neighborhood disinvestment predicts shorter cancer survival time among Black women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States, 2010-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1