Evaluating biparametric MRI for diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer with variant urothelial histology: a multicenter study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s40644-025-00831-x
Peikun Liu, Lingkai Cai, Hongliang Que, Meihua Jiang, Xuping Jiang, Bo Liang, Gongcheng Wang, Linjing Jiang, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu
{"title":"Evaluating biparametric MRI for diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer with variant urothelial histology: a multicenter study.","authors":"Peikun Liu, Lingkai Cai, Hongliang Que, Meihua Jiang, Xuping Jiang, Bo Liang, Gongcheng Wang, Linjing Jiang, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00831-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) based on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in cases of pure urothelial carcinoma. However, the performance of VI-RADS based on mp-MRI and biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma with variant histology (VUC) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the applicability of VI-RADS using mp-MRI and bp-MRI in diagnosing MIBC in patients with VUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients with VUC from different medical centers. Each patient underwent mp-MRI, with images evaluated using VI-RADS scores. The acquired images were divided into two groups: the mp-MRI group and the bp-MRI group. The mp-MRI group was evaluated according to the VI-RADS protocol. For the bp-MRI group, two VI-RADS scoring criteria were established: bp-DWI, primarily driven by DWI, and bp-T2WI, primarily driven by T2WI. The bp-MRI group was evaluated based on these two criteria. Inter-reader agreement performance was evaluated using Kappa analysis. The evaluation methods were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) was performed used DeLong's test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-reader agreement was high across all evaluation methods, with Kappa values exceeding 0.80. The AUCs for mp-MRI, bp-DWI, and bp-T2WI were 0.934, 0.885, and 0.932, respectively. The diagnostic performance of bp-T2WI was comparable with that of mp-MRI (p = 0.682) and significantly higher than bp-DWI (p = 0.007). Both mp-MRI and bp-T2WI demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VI-RADS based on mp-MRI demonstrates good diagnostic performance for MIBC in VUC patients. bp-T2WI may provide comparable diagnostic performance to mp-MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00831-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) based on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in cases of pure urothelial carcinoma. However, the performance of VI-RADS based on mp-MRI and biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma with variant histology (VUC) remains unknown.

Purpose: To evaluate the applicability of VI-RADS using mp-MRI and bp-MRI in diagnosing MIBC in patients with VUC.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients with VUC from different medical centers. Each patient underwent mp-MRI, with images evaluated using VI-RADS scores. The acquired images were divided into two groups: the mp-MRI group and the bp-MRI group. The mp-MRI group was evaluated according to the VI-RADS protocol. For the bp-MRI group, two VI-RADS scoring criteria were established: bp-DWI, primarily driven by DWI, and bp-T2WI, primarily driven by T2WI. The bp-MRI group was evaluated based on these two criteria. Inter-reader agreement performance was evaluated using Kappa analysis. The evaluation methods were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) was performed used DeLong's test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Inter-reader agreement was high across all evaluation methods, with Kappa values exceeding 0.80. The AUCs for mp-MRI, bp-DWI, and bp-T2WI were 0.934, 0.885, and 0.932, respectively. The diagnostic performance of bp-T2WI was comparable with that of mp-MRI (p = 0.682) and significantly higher than bp-DWI (p = 0.007). Both mp-MRI and bp-T2WI demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion: VI-RADS based on mp-MRI demonstrates good diagnostic performance for MIBC in VUC patients. bp-T2WI may provide comparable diagnostic performance to mp-MRI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估双参数MRI诊断具有不同尿路上皮组织学的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌:一项多中心研究。
背景:基于多参数MRI (mp-MRI)的膀胱影像报告和数据系统(VI-RADS)在纯尿路上皮癌的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)诊断中表现优异。然而,基于mp-MRI和双参数MRI (bp-MRI)的VI-RADS在诊断变型组织学尿路上皮癌(VUC)中的表现尚不清楚。目的:评价mp-MRI与bp-MRI联合应用VI-RADS诊断VUC患者MIBC的适用性。方法:对来自不同医疗中心的86例VUC患者进行回顾性分析。每位患者均接受mp-MRI检查,并使用VI-RADS评分对图像进行评估。将采集的图像分为mp-MRI组和bp-MRI组。mp-MRI组按照VI-RADS方案进行评估。对于bp-MRI组,建立了两个VI-RADS评分标准:bp-DWI,主要由DWI驱动,bp-T2WI,主要由T2WI驱动。bp-MRI组根据这两个标准进行评估。使用Kappa分析评估读者间协议表现。采用受试者工作特征曲线对评价方法进行评价。曲线下面积(AUC)采用DeLong试验进行比较。p值结果:所有评价方法的读者间一致性都很高,Kappa值超过0.80。mp-MRI、bp-DWI、bp-T2WI的auc分别为0.934、0.885、0.932。bp-T2WI的诊断价值与mp-MRI相当(p = 0.682),显著高于bp-DWI (p = 0.007)。mp-MRI和bp-T2WI均具有较高的敏感性和特异性。结论:基于mp-MRI的VI-RADS对VUC患者的MIBC有较好的诊断价值。bp-T2WI可提供与mp-MRI相当的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
期刊最新文献
Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI. The result prediction of fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer patients based on machine learning and deep learning models: a multicenter study. Response assessment in rectal cancer undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy: decision tree analysis integrating contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Precision medicine in myeloma demands precision imaging: is whole body MRI the solution? Prediction of MYC/BCL-2 co-expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using a multimodal fusion model: a retrospective study based on PET/CT habitat radiomics and deep learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1