Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic.

IF 2.3 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.4081/dr.2024.10138
Luigi Naldi, Vincenzo Bettoli, Eugenio Santoro, Maria Rosa Valetto, Anna Bolzon, Fortunato Cassalia, Simone Cazzaniga, Sergio Cima, Andrea Danese, Silvia Emendi, Monica Ponzano, Nicoletta Scarpa, Pietro Dri
{"title":"Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic.","authors":"Luigi Naldi, Vincenzo Bettoli, Eugenio Santoro, Maria Rosa Valetto, Anna Bolzon, Fortunato Cassalia, Simone Cazzaniga, Sergio Cima, Andrea Danese, Silvia Emendi, Monica Ponzano, Nicoletta Scarpa, Pietro Dri","doi":"10.4081/dr.2024.10138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT can answer open-ended and complex questions, but its accuracy in providing reliable medical information requires a careful assessment. As part of the AICHECK (Artificial Intelligence for CME Health E-learning Contents and Knowledge) Study, aimed at evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in continuous medical education (CME), we compared ChatGPT-generated educational contents to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on acne vulgaris. ChatGPT version 4 was exposed to a 23-item questionnaire developed by an experienced dermatologist. A panel of five dermatologists rated the answers positively in terms of \"quality\" (87.8%), \"readability\" (94.8%), \"accuracy\" (75.7%), \"thoroughness\" (85.2%), and \"consistency\" with guidelines (76.8%). The references provided by ChatGPT obtained positive ratings for \"pertinence\" (94.6%), \"relevance\" (91.2%), and \"update\" (62.3%). The internal reproducibility was adequate both for answers (93.5%) and references (67.4%). Answers related to issues of uncertainty and/or controversy in the scientific community scored the lowest. This study underscores the need to develop rigorous evaluation criteria for AI-generated medical content and for expert oversight to ensure accuracy and guideline adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11049,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.10138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT can answer open-ended and complex questions, but its accuracy in providing reliable medical information requires a careful assessment. As part of the AICHECK (Artificial Intelligence for CME Health E-learning Contents and Knowledge) Study, aimed at evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in continuous medical education (CME), we compared ChatGPT-generated educational contents to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on acne vulgaris. ChatGPT version 4 was exposed to a 23-item questionnaire developed by an experienced dermatologist. A panel of five dermatologists rated the answers positively in terms of "quality" (87.8%), "readability" (94.8%), "accuracy" (75.7%), "thoroughness" (85.2%), and "consistency" with guidelines (76.8%). The references provided by ChatGPT obtained positive ratings for "pertinence" (94.6%), "relevance" (91.2%), and "update" (62.3%). The internal reproducibility was adequate both for answers (93.5%) and references (67.4%). Answers related to issues of uncertainty and/or controversy in the scientific community scored the lowest. This study underscores the need to develop rigorous evaluation criteria for AI-generated medical content and for expert oversight to ensure accuracy and guideline adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology Reports
Dermatology Reports DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Novel therapeutic approach for loxoscelism: efficacy of cefixime and netilmicin sulfate combination therapy. Paradoxical reaction under dupilumab triggered by occasional ketoprofen intake. Yellow urticaria as a rare dermatological manifestation of biliary obstruction: a case report. Real-life effectiveness of narrowband UVB phototherapy for pityriasis lichenoides: a retrospective study. Generalized bullous drug eruption triggered by ceftriaxone: a case report and literature overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1