Risk factors for residual neuropathic pain using specific screening tools in postoperative patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08722-2
Shinsuke Ikeda, Masayuki Miyagi, Gen Inoue, Toshitaka Yoshii, Satoru Egawa, Kenichiro Sakai, Masahiko Takahata, Tsutomu Endo, Shunji Tsutsui, Masao Koda, Hiroshi Takahashi, Satoshi Kato, Kanji Mori, Hideaki Nakajima, Takeo Furuya, Satoshi Maki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Norihiro Nishida, Kazuo Kusano, Hiroaki Nakashima, Yuji Yokozeki, Masashi Takaso, Masashi Yamazaki
{"title":"Risk factors for residual neuropathic pain using specific screening tools in postoperative patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.","authors":"Shinsuke Ikeda, Masayuki Miyagi, Gen Inoue, Toshitaka Yoshii, Satoru Egawa, Kenichiro Sakai, Masahiko Takahata, Tsutomu Endo, Shunji Tsutsui, Masao Koda, Hiroshi Takahashi, Satoshi Kato, Kanji Mori, Hideaki Nakajima, Takeo Furuya, Satoshi Maki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Norihiro Nishida, Kazuo Kusano, Hiroaki Nakashima, Yuji Yokozeki, Masashi Takaso, Masashi Yamazaki","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08722-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ageing, long illness duration, and poor preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were reported to be risk factors for residual pain after cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (cOPLL). In this study, we focused on residual neuropathic pain (NeP) and aimed to elucidate risk factors for residual NeP after cOPLL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total of 234 patients who underwent cOPLL surgery were included. NeP was evaluated using painDETECT (PDQ) and Spine painDETECT (SPDQ) questionnaires. Score of ≥ 13 / ≥ 0 was defined as NeP for PDQ/SPDQ. Patient backgrounds factors, preoperative radiographic factors and surgical factors were reviewed, and comparisons between the NeP(+) and NeP(-) groups were made. Independent risk factors for residual NeP were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of residual NeP after cOPLL was 22.6% on PDQ and 55.1% on SPDQ. Preoperative JOA score was significantly lower in the NeP(+) group for PDQ compared with that in the NeP(-) group. Additionally, cervical lordosis angle was significantly lower in the NeP(+) group for SPDQ compared with that in the NeP(-) group. Following multiple logistic regression analysis, poor preoperative JOA score was identified as a risk factor for NeP on the PDQ. Poor preoperative JOA score and low cervical lordosis angle were identified as risk factors using the SPDQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found high prevalence of residual NeP after cOPLL. Patients with a poor preoperative JOA score and low cervical lordosis angle might be at risk for residual NeP after surgery evaluated by PDQ or SPDQ and should be monitored with greater care after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2239-2246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08722-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ageing, long illness duration, and poor preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were reported to be risk factors for residual pain after cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (cOPLL). In this study, we focused on residual neuropathic pain (NeP) and aimed to elucidate risk factors for residual NeP after cOPLL.

Methods: Total of 234 patients who underwent cOPLL surgery were included. NeP was evaluated using painDETECT (PDQ) and Spine painDETECT (SPDQ) questionnaires. Score of ≥ 13 / ≥ 0 was defined as NeP for PDQ/SPDQ. Patient backgrounds factors, preoperative radiographic factors and surgical factors were reviewed, and comparisons between the NeP(+) and NeP(-) groups were made. Independent risk factors for residual NeP were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results: Prevalence of residual NeP after cOPLL was 22.6% on PDQ and 55.1% on SPDQ. Preoperative JOA score was significantly lower in the NeP(+) group for PDQ compared with that in the NeP(-) group. Additionally, cervical lordosis angle was significantly lower in the NeP(+) group for SPDQ compared with that in the NeP(-) group. Following multiple logistic regression analysis, poor preoperative JOA score was identified as a risk factor for NeP on the PDQ. Poor preoperative JOA score and low cervical lordosis angle were identified as risk factors using the SPDQ.

Conclusions: We found high prevalence of residual NeP after cOPLL. Patients with a poor preoperative JOA score and low cervical lordosis angle might be at risk for residual NeP after surgery evaluated by PDQ or SPDQ and should be monitored with greater care after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用特定筛查工具对颈椎后纵韧带骨化术后患者残留神经性疼痛的危险因素。
目的:据报道,年龄,病程长,术前日本骨科协会(JOA)评分差是颈椎后纵韧带骨化(cOPLL)后残留疼痛的危险因素。在本研究中,我们重点关注残留神经性疼痛(NeP),旨在阐明cOPLL术后残留NeP的危险因素。方法:共纳入234例cOPLL手术患者。采用painDETECT (PDQ)和Spine painDETECT (SPDQ)问卷对NeP进行评估。PDQ/SPDQ评分≥13 /≥0定义为NeP。回顾患者背景因素、术前影像学因素和手术因素,比较NeP(+)组和NeP(-)组之间的差异。使用多元logistic回归分析评估剩余NeP的独立危险因素。结果:cOPLL术后残存NeP的发生率为PDQ组22.6%,SPDQ组55.1%。PDQ NeP(+)组术前JOA评分明显低于NeP(-)组。此外,与NeP(-)组相比,NeP(+)组SPDQ的颈椎前凸角明显降低。经多元logistic回归分析,术前JOA评分差被确定为PDQ上NeP的危险因素。术前JOA评分差和颈椎前凸角低被SPDQ确定为危险因素。结论:我们发现cOPLL后残留NeP的发生率很高。术前JOA评分较差、颈椎前凸角较低的患者,术后经PDQ或SPDQ评估可能存在残留NeP的风险,术后应更加谨慎监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Spinal morphology-based multimodal AI for predicting pulmonary dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Can curve characteristics predict severe progression in night-time bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Is there a difference in early postoperative adjacent segment angles following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared to cervical disc replacement? Comparing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prophylactic use of topical vancomycin reduces the incidence of postoperative wound infection in surgery for spinal metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1