David M Wang, Michelangelo Vestita, Fadi G Murad, Frederick C Morgan, Rachael Rowley, Eleni M Rettig, William Lotter, Abigail B Waldman, Emily S Ruiz, Chrysalyne D Schmults
{"title":"Mohs Surgery vs Wide Local Excision in Primary High-Stage Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"David M Wang, Michelangelo Vestita, Fadi G Murad, Frederick C Morgan, Rachael Rowley, Eleni M Rettig, William Lotter, Abigail B Waldman, Emily S Ruiz, Chrysalyne D Schmults","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>High-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has an increased risk of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Studies investigating the outcomes of high-stage cSCC among patients treated with Mohs surgery compared with those treated with wide local excision (WLE) are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the outcomes of primary high-stage cSCC among patients treated with Mohs surgery compared with those treated with WLE.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study using propensity score weighting was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Patients were included if they had primary high-stage cSCC and had been treated with either Mohs surgery or WLE between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed between November 3 and 6, 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Primary surgical treatment with Mohs surgery or WLE.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes included local recurrence, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis, any recurrence (ie, a composite outcome of recurrence or metastasis), and disease-specific death. Propensity scores were estimated via logistic regression using baseline patient and tumor characteristics. Competing risk regression analysis was used to compute crude and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs), and Fine-Gray subdistribution HRs and to derive cumulative incidence functions stratified by Mohs and WLE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 216 patients with high-stage cSCC who had a mean (SD) age of 73.5 (13.3) years; 151 (69.9%) were men and 65 (30.1%) were women. The median follow-up time was 33.1 months (IQR, 11.3-77.6 months). After IPTW, the baseline characteristics were well balanced between the WLE and Mohs surgery treatment groups, with absolute standardized differences of less than 0.10 across all characteristics. In the IPTW competing risks model, the 3-year cumulative incidence of all adverse outcomes were greater among patients in the WLE group compared with those in the Mohs surgery group, including local recurrence (19.8% vs 9.6%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.39-3.92]; P = .001), nodal metastasis (17.9% vs 11.0%; weighted cause-specific HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.07-3.02]; P = .03), distant metastasis (8.4% vs 4.4%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.10 [95% CI, 0.97-4.57]; P = .06), any recurrence (32.0% vs 15.8%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.57-3.61]; P < .001), and disease-specific death (17.5% vs 7.1%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.54-4.88]; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study suggest that Mohs surgery was associated with improved outcomes in the treatment of primary high-stage cSCC compared with WLE. These findings further suggest that Mohs surgery or alternative methods of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment should be offered as first-line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6214","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: High-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has an increased risk of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Studies investigating the outcomes of high-stage cSCC among patients treated with Mohs surgery compared with those treated with wide local excision (WLE) are limited.
Objective: To assess the outcomes of primary high-stage cSCC among patients treated with Mohs surgery compared with those treated with WLE.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study using propensity score weighting was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Patients were included if they had primary high-stage cSCC and had been treated with either Mohs surgery or WLE between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed between November 3 and 6, 2023.
Exposures: Primary surgical treatment with Mohs surgery or WLE.
Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes included local recurrence, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis, any recurrence (ie, a composite outcome of recurrence or metastasis), and disease-specific death. Propensity scores were estimated via logistic regression using baseline patient and tumor characteristics. Competing risk regression analysis was used to compute crude and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs), and Fine-Gray subdistribution HRs and to derive cumulative incidence functions stratified by Mohs and WLE.
Results: This study included 216 patients with high-stage cSCC who had a mean (SD) age of 73.5 (13.3) years; 151 (69.9%) were men and 65 (30.1%) were women. The median follow-up time was 33.1 months (IQR, 11.3-77.6 months). After IPTW, the baseline characteristics were well balanced between the WLE and Mohs surgery treatment groups, with absolute standardized differences of less than 0.10 across all characteristics. In the IPTW competing risks model, the 3-year cumulative incidence of all adverse outcomes were greater among patients in the WLE group compared with those in the Mohs surgery group, including local recurrence (19.8% vs 9.6%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.39-3.92]; P = .001), nodal metastasis (17.9% vs 11.0%; weighted cause-specific HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.07-3.02]; P = .03), distant metastasis (8.4% vs 4.4%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.10 [95% CI, 0.97-4.57]; P = .06), any recurrence (32.0% vs 15.8%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.57-3.61]; P < .001), and disease-specific death (17.5% vs 7.1%; weighted cause-specific HR, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.54-4.88]; P = .001).
Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that Mohs surgery was associated with improved outcomes in the treatment of primary high-stage cSCC compared with WLE. These findings further suggest that Mohs surgery or alternative methods of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment should be offered as first-line treatment.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.