Rapid cognitive assessment: Accuracy and discriminant validity of Mini-Cog and process-based Clock Drawing Test.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1177/13872877251314788
Qian Yang, Hao Yang, Wei Long, Sheng Zuo, Defa Zhu, Qihao Guo
{"title":"Rapid cognitive assessment: Accuracy and discriminant validity of Mini-Cog and process-based Clock Drawing Test.","authors":"Qian Yang, Hao Yang, Wei Long, Sheng Zuo, Defa Zhu, Qihao Guo","doi":"10.1177/13872877251314788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Mini-Cog is a brief cognitive examination comprising a three-item memory recall and a simplified Clock Drawing Test (CDT). There is limited research on the effects of detailed scoring criteria for the Mini-Cog on cognitive screening.ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic effectiveness of three Mini-Cog versions and a new process-based CDT test in identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to cognitively normal controls (NC).MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 950 subjects who underwent standardized neuropsychological assessments and the Mini-Cog test. The CDT was scored using an adapted 10-point scale. The accuracy of three Mini-Cog versions (Mini-Cog1: 3-word delayed recall + 2-point CDT; Mini-Cog2: 3-word immediate recall + 3-word delayed recall + 3-point CDT; Mini-Cog3: 3-word immediate recall + 3-word delayed recall + 10-point CDT) was assessed through the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for each diagnostic threshold.ResultsThe optimal cut-off point for Mini-Cog3 is 12/16 for MCI and 10/16 for AD. Mini-Cog3 demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy, with AUCs of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) for MCI and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97) for AD, with sensitivity of 85% for both MCI and AD. The CDT's AUCs were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81) for MCI, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90) for AD, with sensitivity of 89% for MCI, and 82% for AD.ConclusionsA more elaborate scoring system, such as Mini-Cog3, may serve as an effective screening method for the rapid and accurate detection of cognitive dysfunction in patients with MCI and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251314788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Mini-Cog is a brief cognitive examination comprising a three-item memory recall and a simplified Clock Drawing Test (CDT). There is limited research on the effects of detailed scoring criteria for the Mini-Cog on cognitive screening.ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic effectiveness of three Mini-Cog versions and a new process-based CDT test in identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to cognitively normal controls (NC).MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 950 subjects who underwent standardized neuropsychological assessments and the Mini-Cog test. The CDT was scored using an adapted 10-point scale. The accuracy of three Mini-Cog versions (Mini-Cog1: 3-word delayed recall + 2-point CDT; Mini-Cog2: 3-word immediate recall + 3-word delayed recall + 3-point CDT; Mini-Cog3: 3-word immediate recall + 3-word delayed recall + 10-point CDT) was assessed through the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for each diagnostic threshold.ResultsThe optimal cut-off point for Mini-Cog3 is 12/16 for MCI and 10/16 for AD. Mini-Cog3 demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy, with AUCs of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) for MCI and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97) for AD, with sensitivity of 85% for both MCI and AD. The CDT's AUCs were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81) for MCI, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90) for AD, with sensitivity of 89% for MCI, and 82% for AD.ConclusionsA more elaborate scoring system, such as Mini-Cog3, may serve as an effective screening method for the rapid and accurate detection of cognitive dysfunction in patients with MCI and AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速认知评估:Mini-Cog和基于过程的时钟图测试的准确性和判别效度。
背景:Mini-Cog是一个简短的认知测试,包括三项记忆回忆和简化的时钟绘制测试(CDT)。关于Mini-Cog详细评分标准对认知筛查的影响的研究有限。目的:与认知正常对照(NC)相比,评估三种Mini-Cog版本和一种新的基于过程的CDT测试对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断效果。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了950名受试者,他们接受了标准化的神经心理学评估和Mini-Cog测试。CDT的评分采用10分制。三种Mini-Cog版本的准确率(Mini-Cog1: 3字延迟召回+ 2点CDT;Mini-Cog2: 3字即时召回+ 3字延迟召回+ 3点CDT;Mini-Cog3: 3字即时回忆+ 3字延迟回忆+ 10点CDT)通过受试者工作特征分析评估。确定每个诊断阈值的敏感性和特异性。结果:Mini-Cog3的最佳截断点为MCI的12/16和AD的10/16。Mini-Cog3表现出最高的诊断效能,MCI的auc为0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), AD的auc为0.95 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), MCI和AD的敏感性均为85%。MCI的CDT auc为0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81), AD的CDT auc为0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90), MCI的敏感性为89%,AD的敏感性为82%。结论:一个更精细的评分系统,如Mini-Cog3,可以作为一种有效的筛选方法,快速准确地检测MCI和AD患者的认知功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Characteristic activation pattern and network connectivity of brain in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild cognitive impairment: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. A novel presenilin 1 nucleotide mutation (M139I) and its pathological function in a Chinese family with early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Brain age prediction in a multiethnic Asian population: A comparison of machine learning algorithms and their application for early-stage cognitive impairment diagnosis. The cognitive neutrality of common antidiabetic medications in older adults: A propensity score-matched cohort analysis from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. Retraction: Leptin Reduces the Accumulation of Aβ and Phosphorylated Tau Induced by 27-Hydroxycholesterol in Rabbit Organotypic Slices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1