Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8
Bengt A Wiemann, Oliver Beetz, Clara A Weigle, Philipp Tessmer, Simon Störzer, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Oldhafer
{"title":"Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis.","authors":"Bengt A Wiemann, Oliver Beetz, Clara A Weigle, Philipp Tessmer, Simon Störzer, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Oldhafer","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication following liver transplantation. With more marginal donors and critical recipients, identifying EAD risk factors and their impact on long-term outcomes is crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed all liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2017 at our institution, excluding pediatric recipients, combined thoracic transplants, and retransplants in the same hospital stay. EAD was defined as either: (i) AST/ALT > 2000 IU/l in first 7 postoperative days (POD), (ii) Bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dl on POD 7, (iii) INR ≥ 1.6 on POD 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 621 cases analyzed, the EAD rate was 53.6%. Multivariate analysis identified only donor-dependent variables as independent risk factors for the onset of EAD: donor age (p = 0.012), donor serum sodium (p = 0.021), cold ischemic time (p = 0.007) and graft weight (p < 0.001). EAD significantly impaired graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2% after 1 year; p = 0.005) but did not impact long-term patient survival (76.3% vs. 87.6% after 1 year; p = 0.162). Of the EAD components, elevated INR proved to be the only reliable predictor of patient mortality. Additionally, an AST/ALT concentration of > 4000 IU/l significantly improved the predictive value of the EAD definition for patient survival (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EAD risk factors are primarily donor-based and significantly impair graft but not patient survival. The high EAD rates and increased use of marginal grafts suggest the need to adjust conventional EAD definitions to optimize graft allocation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication following liver transplantation. With more marginal donors and critical recipients, identifying EAD risk factors and their impact on long-term outcomes is crucial.

Methods: We reviewed all liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2017 at our institution, excluding pediatric recipients, combined thoracic transplants, and retransplants in the same hospital stay. EAD was defined as either: (i) AST/ALT > 2000 IU/l in first 7 postoperative days (POD), (ii) Bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dl on POD 7, (iii) INR ≥ 1.6 on POD 7.

Results: Of the 621 cases analyzed, the EAD rate was 53.6%. Multivariate analysis identified only donor-dependent variables as independent risk factors for the onset of EAD: donor age (p = 0.012), donor serum sodium (p = 0.021), cold ischemic time (p = 0.007) and graft weight (p < 0.001). EAD significantly impaired graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2% after 1 year; p = 0.005) but did not impact long-term patient survival (76.3% vs. 87.6% after 1 year; p = 0.162). Of the EAD components, elevated INR proved to be the only reliable predictor of patient mortality. Additionally, an AST/ALT concentration of > 4000 IU/l significantly improved the predictive value of the EAD definition for patient survival (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: EAD risk factors are primarily donor-based and significantly impair graft but not patient survival. The high EAD rates and increased use of marginal grafts suggest the need to adjust conventional EAD definitions to optimize graft allocation in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Which technical difficulty score can best predict postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive liver resections? Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic central hepatectomy: a comparison with open surgery. Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis. Safety and outcomes of gasless transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer. Colorectal surgeons' perspectives on the efficacy of intraoperative bowel perfusion technology with a focus on indocyanine green fluorescence angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1