Efficacy of conservative intervention for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of ankle sprain: A systematic review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13328
Takumi Kobayashi, Yuta Koshino
{"title":"Efficacy of conservative intervention for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of ankle sprain: A systematic review.","authors":"Takumi Kobayashi, Yuta Koshino","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia, a fear-avoidance belief regarding exercise, in individuals who have had a lateral ankle sprain.</p><p><strong>Literature survey: </strong>Systematic computerized literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain, including chronic ankle instability, compared to those of control, sham, or different conservative interventions were included. They were written in English and published prior to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Two independent reviewers screened the studies using specific eligibility criteria. Study characteristics, patients, intervention and comparator, and outcome were extracted. Outcomes were defined as kinesiophobia observed using a questionnaire (eg, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11) or other means. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>Five randomized controlled trials were included. These studies examined the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation, joint mobilization, balance and strength training, visual biofeedback during multimodal training, and low-friction patches attached to the outside of shoes, respectively. Limited evidence from single studies showed that the visual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes were significantly more effective than the control and other treatments for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of a lateral ankle sprain. Because the intervention and control groups differed between studies, data synthesis through meta-analysis was not performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes may improve kinesiophobia in patients with a history of lateral ankle sprains. An approach to sensory-perceptual impairment in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprains may be more effective in improving kinesiophobia. These conservative interventions may have an effect on kinesiophobia, but the evidence is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia, a fear-avoidance belief regarding exercise, in individuals who have had a lateral ankle sprain.

Literature survey: Systematic computerized literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain, including chronic ankle instability, compared to those of control, sham, or different conservative interventions were included. They were written in English and published prior to December 2023.

Methodology: Two independent reviewers screened the studies using specific eligibility criteria. Study characteristics, patients, intervention and comparator, and outcome were extracted. Outcomes were defined as kinesiophobia observed using a questionnaire (eg, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11) or other means. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials.

Synthesis: Five randomized controlled trials were included. These studies examined the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation, joint mobilization, balance and strength training, visual biofeedback during multimodal training, and low-friction patches attached to the outside of shoes, respectively. Limited evidence from single studies showed that the visual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes were significantly more effective than the control and other treatments for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of a lateral ankle sprain. Because the intervention and control groups differed between studies, data synthesis through meta-analysis was not performed.

Conclusions: Visual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes may improve kinesiophobia in patients with a history of lateral ankle sprains. An approach to sensory-perceptual impairment in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprains may be more effective in improving kinesiophobia. These conservative interventions may have an effect on kinesiophobia, but the evidence is limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, proficiency profile, and specialty perceptions of Peruvian physiatrists: A survey study. Efficacy of conservative intervention for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of ankle sprain: A systematic review. Flipping the script: Conservative management of a flipped intrathecal baclofen pump. Patients' real-world engagement with movement pattern modifications for nonarthritic hip-related pain. Advances in musculoskeletal ultrasound-Chronicle of a 25-year live witness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1