"I know that all this is me" Pathways of change in complex dissociative disorder.

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2025.2457402
Ingunn Holbæk, Karianne Vrabel, Margrethe Seeger Halvorsen
{"title":"\"I know that all this is me\" Pathways of change in complex dissociative disorder.","authors":"Ingunn Holbæk, Karianne Vrabel, Margrethe Seeger Halvorsen","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2457402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative study explored changes described by individuals with complex dissociative disorders (CDDs) 2 years after participating in a psychoeducative group. Few recent studies have examined the early changes from incomprehensible reactions to the integration of traumatic events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 25 participants with CDD 2 years after completing a 20-week psychoeducative skills training group. Transcripts were analysed using an interpretive phenomenological framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three pathways of change were identified: (1) the ability to be present in life, (2) ways of approaching internal conflicts and (3) the degree of ownership of the self. These pathways illustrate the initial steps towards integration, in which participants start recognizing and confronting previously avoided emotions and experiences. This allows them to better tolerate and accept more of themselves. Processes varied among the participants, with some achieving cohesive integration of challenging memories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traditionally, there has been little treatment optimism for individuals with CDD. This study highlights the potential for comprehensive change within 2 years. It contributes to the debate on whether focusing on coping strategies delays trauma memory integration, emphasizing the need for a balance between exposure and coping based on the patient's capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"124-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2457402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This qualitative study explored changes described by individuals with complex dissociative disorders (CDDs) 2 years after participating in a psychoeducative group. Few recent studies have examined the early changes from incomprehensible reactions to the integration of traumatic events.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with 25 participants with CDD 2 years after completing a 20-week psychoeducative skills training group. Transcripts were analysed using an interpretive phenomenological framework.

Results: Three pathways of change were identified: (1) the ability to be present in life, (2) ways of approaching internal conflicts and (3) the degree of ownership of the self. These pathways illustrate the initial steps towards integration, in which participants start recognizing and confronting previously avoided emotions and experiences. This allows them to better tolerate and accept more of themselves. Processes varied among the participants, with some achieving cohesive integration of challenging memories.

Conclusion: Traditionally, there has been little treatment optimism for individuals with CDD. This study highlights the potential for comprehensive change within 2 years. It contributes to the debate on whether focusing on coping strategies delays trauma memory integration, emphasizing the need for a balance between exposure and coping based on the patient's capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我知道这一切都是我”复杂分离性障碍的变化途径。
目的:本定性研究探讨了复杂分离性障碍(cdd)患者在参加心理教育小组2年后所描述的变化。最近很少有研究调查了从难以理解的反应到创伤事件整合的早期变化。方法:对25名完成20周心理教育技能培训2年后的CDD患者进行访谈。使用解释现象学框架分析转录本。结果:确定了三种改变途径:(1)在生活中存在的能力;(2)处理内部冲突的方式;(3)对自我的拥有程度。这些途径说明了迈向融合的最初步骤,参与者开始认识和面对以前避免的情绪和经历。这让他们能够更好地容忍和接受自己。参与者的过程各不相同,有些人实现了挑战性记忆的内聚整合。结论:传统上,对CDD患者的治疗很少乐观。这项研究强调了两年内全面改变的潜力。它有助于讨论关注应对策略是否会延迟创伤记忆整合,强调需要根据患者的能力在暴露和应对之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
Does attachment change serve as a theory-specific mediator of depression reduction in interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy? Exploring poor outcome cases in emotion-focused therapy-a mixed-method study. Attitudes toward standardized progress measures: Development of a revised measure in China and cross-cultural validation in the United States. Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis. Improvement of emotional dysregulation, aggression, and self-harm among people treated within outpatient personality disorder mental health services. A large longitudinal, observational, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1