Attractiveness and determinants of maxillary midline diastemas in a West African smile.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1038/s41405-025-00302-2
Sefaakor Ahiaku, Brian J Millar, Michael Cronin
{"title":"Attractiveness and determinants of maxillary midline diastemas in a West African smile.","authors":"Sefaakor Ahiaku, Brian J Millar, Michael Cronin","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00302-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This cross-sectional study examines whether the assumption that diastemas of 1 mm or greater are un-attractive is true in a Black West-African population, and identifies the determinants of attractiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured questionnaire was self-administered to adult participants, who rated digitally altered full-face colour photographs of a male and female model with diastema widths of 0-6 mm on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative data was analysed using SAS® (version 9.4) and SPSS® (version 26). Qualitative data was analysed with thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>375 participants completed the questionnaire (51% female, 48% male, 1% preferred not to disclose) with a modal age of 25-34. 65% of participants found maxillary midline diastema esthetic and/or desirable, with 63% of those with diastemas choosing to have no treatment, and the desire to have treatment decreasing with increasing age (p = 0.012). No smile was perceived to be unattractive, however female smiles were rated more favourably (p < 0.001) and increasing diastema width correlated with a decreasing attractiveness especially for diastemas wider than 3 mm in females and 2 mm in males. Diastema width, the gender of the model, and whether or not the participant had a diastema themselves was shown to impact perceptions of attractiveness in a multi-variable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited evidence to support the position that MMDs over 1 mm are not attractive in this population. Diastemas of ≤3 mm in females and ≤2 mm in males are considered attractive. In addition gender, diastema width, and an individual's own diastema (or absence thereof) impact perceived attractiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00302-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This cross-sectional study examines whether the assumption that diastemas of 1 mm or greater are un-attractive is true in a Black West-African population, and identifies the determinants of attractiveness.

Methods: A structured questionnaire was self-administered to adult participants, who rated digitally altered full-face colour photographs of a male and female model with diastema widths of 0-6 mm on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative data was analysed using SAS® (version 9.4) and SPSS® (version 26). Qualitative data was analysed with thematic analysis.

Results: 375 participants completed the questionnaire (51% female, 48% male, 1% preferred not to disclose) with a modal age of 25-34. 65% of participants found maxillary midline diastema esthetic and/or desirable, with 63% of those with diastemas choosing to have no treatment, and the desire to have treatment decreasing with increasing age (p = 0.012). No smile was perceived to be unattractive, however female smiles were rated more favourably (p < 0.001) and increasing diastema width correlated with a decreasing attractiveness especially for diastemas wider than 3 mm in females and 2 mm in males. Diastema width, the gender of the model, and whether or not the participant had a diastema themselves was shown to impact perceptions of attractiveness in a multi-variable analysis.

Conclusion: There is limited evidence to support the position that MMDs over 1 mm are not attractive in this population. Diastemas of ≤3 mm in females and ≤2 mm in males are considered attractive. In addition gender, diastema width, and an individual's own diastema (or absence thereof) impact perceived attractiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西非微笑中上颌中线间隙的吸引力和决定因素。
本横断面研究探讨了1毫米或更大的裂口在西非黑人人群中是否不具有吸引力的假设,并确定了吸引力的决定因素。方法:对成年参与者自行进行结构化问卷调查,他们以5分李克特量表对隔膜宽度为0-6毫米的男性和女性模特的数字修改的全脸彩色照片进行评分。定量数据采用SAS®(version 9.4)和SPSS®(version 26)进行分析。对定性数据进行专题分析。结果:375名参与者完成了问卷(51%女性,48%男性,1%不愿透露),模态年龄为25-34岁。65%的参与者认为上颌中线隔膜美观和/或理想,63%的隔膜患者选择不进行治疗,并且随着年龄的增长,治疗的愿望减少(p = 0.012)。没有微笑的人被认为是不吸引人的,然而女性的微笑被认为是更有吸引力的(p结论:有有限的证据支持mmd超过1毫米在这个人群中没有吸引力的观点。雌性裂口≤3mm,雄性裂口≤2mm被认为是有吸引力的。此外,性别、隔膜宽度和个体自身的隔膜(或不存在隔膜)影响感知吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishing a postgraduate programme in orthodontics in the Caribbean: governance, collaborations and challenges, at the University of the West Indies. Dental, mandibular and parotid gland radiation doses in curatively treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. The association between systemic immune-inflammation index and periodontitis in adults with and without hyperlipidemia: a population-based study. Exploring the shared genetic architecture between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease. Correction: Evaluation of an intermediate minor oral surgery service in Plymouth, England and implications for future commissioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1