Special Issue on CDS Failures: Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital Length-of-Stay for Cancer Patients with Fever and Neutropenia.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2540-2349
Julia Yarahuan, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Edwin Ray, Rachael LeRoux, Wayne Liang, Evan Orenstein, Claire L Stokes
{"title":"Special Issue on CDS Failures: Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital Length-of-Stay for Cancer Patients with Fever and Neutropenia.","authors":"Julia Yarahuan, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Edwin Ray, Rachael LeRoux, Wayne Liang, Evan Orenstein, Claire L Stokes","doi":"10.1055/a-2540-2349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia are at risk for bacterial sepsis, traditionally requiring extended hospital stays on antibiotics until neutrophil counts recover. According to a new validated scoring system, a subset of these patients is at lower risk and eligible for early discharge and reduced IV antibiotic exposure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reduce length of stay (LOS) for febrile neutropenic patients using clinical decision support (CDS) to identify low risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A CDS system was developed to (1) screen febrile neutropenic patients using a validated clinical decision rule, (2) surface when low risk patients become eligible for discharge, and (3) facilitate close phone follow-up for patients discharged early. The system was implemented in March 2023 and iteratively refined based on usability testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-implementation, LOS did not improve significantly, and uptake of the CDS tool remained low. Though the tool had the potential to reduce LOS, the limited staff engagement was a significant barrier to success. Safety outcomes, including ICU readmissions and mortality, remained unaffected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite carefully designed CDS applying an evidence-based scoring system and using human-centered design methodology, the failure to achieve the desired reduction in LOS was primarily due to insufficient uptake by clinical staff. This highlights the need for stronger strategies to ensure clinician engagement and integration into workflows for CDS tools to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2540-2349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia are at risk for bacterial sepsis, traditionally requiring extended hospital stays on antibiotics until neutrophil counts recover. According to a new validated scoring system, a subset of these patients is at lower risk and eligible for early discharge and reduced IV antibiotic exposure.

Objective: Reduce length of stay (LOS) for febrile neutropenic patients using clinical decision support (CDS) to identify low risk patients.

Methods: A CDS system was developed to (1) screen febrile neutropenic patients using a validated clinical decision rule, (2) surface when low risk patients become eligible for discharge, and (3) facilitate close phone follow-up for patients discharged early. The system was implemented in March 2023 and iteratively refined based on usability testing.

Results: Post-implementation, LOS did not improve significantly, and uptake of the CDS tool remained low. Though the tool had the potential to reduce LOS, the limited staff engagement was a significant barrier to success. Safety outcomes, including ICU readmissions and mortality, remained unaffected.

Conclusion: Despite carefully designed CDS applying an evidence-based scoring system and using human-centered design methodology, the failure to achieve the desired reduction in LOS was primarily due to insufficient uptake by clinical staff. This highlights the need for stronger strategies to ensure clinician engagement and integration into workflows for CDS tools to be effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Special Issue on CDS Failures: Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital Length-of-Stay for Cancer Patients with Fever and Neutropenia. An Interactive Voice Response System for Postoperative Care in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients: A Pilot Study. Sharing a Hybrid EHR + FHIR CDS Tool Across Health Systems: Automating Smoking Cessation for Pediatric Caregivers. Application of an Externally Developed Algorithm to Identify Research Cases and Controls from Electronic Health Record Data: Failures and Successes. Association of an HIV-Prediction Model with Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1