Identifying overlapping and distinctive traits of autism and schizophrenia using machine learning classification.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2025.2464728
Jenna N Pablo, Jorja Shires, Wendy A Torrens, Lena L Kemmelmeier, Sarah M Haigh, Marian E Berryhill
{"title":"Identifying overlapping and distinctive traits of autism and schizophrenia using machine learning classification.","authors":"Jenna N Pablo, Jorja Shires, Wendy A Torrens, Lena L Kemmelmeier, Sarah M Haigh, Marian E Berryhill","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2025.2464728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) share some symptoms. We conducted machine learning classification to determine if common screeners used for research in non-clinical and subclinical populations, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR), could identify <i>non-overlapping</i> symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1,397 undergraduates completed the SPQ-BR and AQ. Random forest classification modelled whether SPQ-BR item scores predicted AQ scores and factors, and vice versa. The models first used all item scores and then the least/most important features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust trait overlap allows for the prediction of AQ from SPQ-BR and vice versa. Results showed that AQ <i>item scores</i> predicted 2 of 3 SPQ-BR factors (disorganised, interpersonal), and SPQ-BR <i>item scores</i> successfully predicted 2 of 5 AQ factors (communication, social skills). Importantly, classification model <u>failures</u> showed that AQ <i>item scores</i> could not predict the SPQ-BR <i>cognitive-perceptual</i> factor, and the SPQ-BR <i>item scores</i> could not predict 3 AQ factors (imagination, attention to detail, attention switching).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the SPQ-BR and AQ measure overlapping symptoms that can be isolated to some factors. Importantly, where we observe model failures, we capture distinctive factors. We provide guidance for leveraging existing screeners to avert misdiagnosis and advancing specific/selective biomarker identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2025.2464728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) share some symptoms. We conducted machine learning classification to determine if common screeners used for research in non-clinical and subclinical populations, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR), could identify non-overlapping symptoms.

Methods: 1,397 undergraduates completed the SPQ-BR and AQ. Random forest classification modelled whether SPQ-BR item scores predicted AQ scores and factors, and vice versa. The models first used all item scores and then the least/most important features.

Results: Robust trait overlap allows for the prediction of AQ from SPQ-BR and vice versa. Results showed that AQ item scores predicted 2 of 3 SPQ-BR factors (disorganised, interpersonal), and SPQ-BR item scores successfully predicted 2 of 5 AQ factors (communication, social skills). Importantly, classification model failures showed that AQ item scores could not predict the SPQ-BR cognitive-perceptual factor, and the SPQ-BR item scores could not predict 3 AQ factors (imagination, attention to detail, attention switching).

Conclusions: Overall, the SPQ-BR and AQ measure overlapping symptoms that can be isolated to some factors. Importantly, where we observe model failures, we capture distinctive factors. We provide guidance for leveraging existing screeners to avert misdiagnosis and advancing specific/selective biomarker identification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
期刊最新文献
The Brain-Wellness Nexus: exploring neurobiological mechanisms and evidence-based interventions for stress resilience in neurodivergent populations. Identifying overlapping and distinctive traits of autism and schizophrenia using machine learning classification. Depth inversion illusion and its relationship to positive symptoms in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers. The effect of apathy on quality of life and caregiver burden in patients with dementia. Theory-driven assessment of cognitive flexibility in bulimia nervosa: a preliminary study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1