Brainstem Substructure Atrophy in Late-Onset GM2-Gangliosidosis Imaging Using Automated Segmentation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Cerebellum Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s12311-025-01803-4
Olivia E Rowe, D Rangaprakash, Florian S Eichler, Jeremy D Schmahmann, Robert L Barry, Christopher D Stephen
{"title":"Brainstem Substructure Atrophy in Late-Onset GM2-Gangliosidosis Imaging Using Automated Segmentation.","authors":"Olivia E Rowe, D Rangaprakash, Florian S Eichler, Jeremy D Schmahmann, Robert L Barry, Christopher D Stephen","doi":"10.1007/s12311-025-01803-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Late-Onset GM2-Gangliosidoses (LOGG) are rare, neurodegenerative lysosomal disorders that include late-onset Tay-Sachs (LOTS) and Sandhoff disease (LOSD) subtypes. Cerebellar atrophy is common, even in the absence of clinical ataxia, particularly in LOTS. Recent reports have also described brainstem atrophy in LOTS. We assessed brainstem substructure atrophy in LOGG, including LOSD. 10 LOGG patients (7 LOTS, 3 LOSD) and 7 age-matched controls had structural MRI brain imaging. A FreeSurfer brainstem substructure module was used for automatic segmentation and included the pons, medulla, superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), midbrain, and total brainstem. Clinical ataxia severity was assessed with the LOTS Severity Scale, Brief Ataxia Rating Scale, Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. There were differences between LOGG and controls in the pons (12,785.06 ± 1,603.84 vs. 15,457.14 ± 2,748.41 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.0069) and SCP (196.93 ± 31.20 vs. 293.57 ± .70.16 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.0003). In LOTS vs. controls, there was similar pons (p = 0.0055) and SCP atrophy (p = 0.0023). The LOSD group was too small for independent comparisons. There were no significant associations between SCP/pons volume and clinical scales or disease duration. Cerebellar volume, which was analyzed in a previous study by Rowe et al. (2021), was relatively preserved in LOSD compared to the SCP/pons, while in LOTS, the pontocerebellar atrophy profile was dominated by cerebellar atrophy. These findings provide anatomical and clinical insights to the cerebellar/brainstem atrophy observed in LOGG and highlight a need to stratify LOGG by subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":"24 2","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01803-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late-Onset GM2-Gangliosidoses (LOGG) are rare, neurodegenerative lysosomal disorders that include late-onset Tay-Sachs (LOTS) and Sandhoff disease (LOSD) subtypes. Cerebellar atrophy is common, even in the absence of clinical ataxia, particularly in LOTS. Recent reports have also described brainstem atrophy in LOTS. We assessed brainstem substructure atrophy in LOGG, including LOSD. 10 LOGG patients (7 LOTS, 3 LOSD) and 7 age-matched controls had structural MRI brain imaging. A FreeSurfer brainstem substructure module was used for automatic segmentation and included the pons, medulla, superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), midbrain, and total brainstem. Clinical ataxia severity was assessed with the LOTS Severity Scale, Brief Ataxia Rating Scale, Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. There were differences between LOGG and controls in the pons (12,785.06 ± 1,603.84 vs. 15,457.14 ± 2,748.41 mm3, p = 0.0069) and SCP (196.93 ± 31.20 vs. 293.57 ± .70.16 mm3, p = 0.0003). In LOTS vs. controls, there was similar pons (p = 0.0055) and SCP atrophy (p = 0.0023). The LOSD group was too small for independent comparisons. There were no significant associations between SCP/pons volume and clinical scales or disease duration. Cerebellar volume, which was analyzed in a previous study by Rowe et al. (2021), was relatively preserved in LOSD compared to the SCP/pons, while in LOTS, the pontocerebellar atrophy profile was dominated by cerebellar atrophy. These findings provide anatomical and clinical insights to the cerebellar/brainstem atrophy observed in LOGG and highlight a need to stratify LOGG by subtypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebellum
Cerebellum 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction. The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging. The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.
期刊最新文献
MRI Shrimp Sign and Parietooccipital Lesion in Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Cerebellar Alterations in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mini-Review. Estradiol Enhances Cerebellar Molecular Layer Interneuron-Purkinje Cell Synaptic Transmission and Improves Motor Learning Through ER-β in Vivo in Mice. Differential Protective Effects of Edaravone in Cerebellar and Hippocampal Ischemic Injury Models. Radiomics-based Modelling Unveils Cerebellar Involvement in Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1