Computed tomography radiomics-based combined model for predicting thymoma risk subgroups: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 3.8 2区医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.010

Yifei Liu, Chao Luo, Yongshun Wu, Shumin Zhou, Guangying Ruan, Haojiang Li, Wanyuan Chen, Yi Lin, Lizhi Liu, Tingting Quan, Xiaodong He

{"title":"Computed tomography radiomics-based combined model for predicting thymoma risk subgroups: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Yifei Liu, Chao Luo, Yongshun Wu, Shumin Zhou, Guangying Ruan, Haojiang Li, Wanyuan Chen, Yi Lin, Lizhi Liu, Tingting Quan, Xiaodong He","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale and objectives: Accurately distinguishing histological subtypes and risk categorization of thymomas is difficult. To differentiate the histologic risk categories of thymomas, we developed a combined radiomics model based on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) radiomics, clinical, and semantic features.Materials and methods: In total, 360 patients with pathologically-confirmed thymomas who underwent CT examinations were retrospectively recruited from three centers. Patients were classified using improved pathological classification criteria as low-risk (LRT: types A and AB) or high-risk (HRT: types B1, B2, and B3). The training and external validation sets comprised 274 (from centers 1 and 2) and 86 (center 3) patients, respectively. A clinical-semantic model was built using clinical and semantic variables. Radiomics features were filtered using intraclass correlation coefficients, correlation analysis, and univariate logistic regression. An optimal radiomics model (Rad_score) was constructed using the AutoML algorithm, while a combined model was constructed by integrating Rad_score with clinical and semantic features. The predictive and clinical performances of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic/calibration curve analyses and decision-curve analysis, respectively.Results: Radiomics and combined models (area under curve: training set, 0.867 and 0.884; external validation set, 0.792 and 0.766, respectively) exhibited performance superior to the clinical-semantic model. The combined model had higher accuracy than the radiomics model (0.79 vs. 0.78, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. The original_firstorder_median of venous phase had the highest relative importance among features in the radiomics model.Conclusion: Radiomics and combined radiomics models may serve as noninvasive discrimination tools to differentiate thymoma risk classifications.","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Accurately distinguishing histological subtypes and risk categorization of thymomas is difficult. To differentiate the histologic risk categories of thymomas, we developed a combined radiomics model based on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) radiomics, clinical, and semantic features.

Materials and methods: In total, 360 patients with pathologically-confirmed thymomas who underwent CT examinations were retrospectively recruited from three centers. Patients were classified using improved pathological classification criteria as low-risk (LRT: types A and AB) or high-risk (HRT: types B1, B2, and B3). The training and external validation sets comprised 274 (from centers 1 and 2) and 86 (center 3) patients, respectively. A clinical-semantic model was built using clinical and semantic variables. Radiomics features were filtered using intraclass correlation coefficients, correlation analysis, and univariate logistic regression. An optimal radiomics model (Rad_score) was constructed using the AutoML algorithm, while a combined model was constructed by integrating Rad_score with clinical and semantic features. The predictive and clinical performances of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic/calibration curve analyses and decision-curve analysis, respectively.

Results: Radiomics and combined models (area under curve: training set, 0.867 and 0.884; external validation set, 0.792 and 0.766, respectively) exhibited performance superior to the clinical-semantic model. The combined model had higher accuracy than the radiomics model (0.79 vs. 0.78, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. The original_firstorder_median of venous phase had the highest relative importance among features in the radiomics model.

Conclusion: Radiomics and combined radiomics models may serve as noninvasive discrimination tools to differentiate thymoma risk classifications.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Academic Radiology 医学-核医学

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

10.40%

发文量

432

审稿时长

18 days

期刊介绍： Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.