Choosing the most suitable NGS technology to combine with a standardized viral enrichment protocol for obtaining complete avian orthoreovirus genomes from metagenomic samples.

IF 2.8 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Frontiers in bioinformatics Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbinf.2025.1498921
Sonsiray Álvarez-Narváez, Telvin L Harrell, Islam Nour, Sujit K Mohanty, Steven J Conrad
{"title":"Choosing the most suitable NGS technology to combine with a standardized viral enrichment protocol for obtaining complete avian orthoreovirus genomes from metagenomic samples.","authors":"Sonsiray Álvarez-Narváez, Telvin L Harrell, Islam Nour, Sujit K Mohanty, Steven J Conrad","doi":"10.3389/fbinf.2025.1498921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since viruses are obligate intracellular pathogens, sequencing their genomes results in metagenomic data from both the virus and the host. Virology researchers are constantly seeking new, cost-effective strategies and bioinformatic pipelines for the retrieval of complete viral genomes from these metagenomic samples. Avian orthoreoviruses (ARVs) pose a significant and growing threat to the poultry industry and frequently cause economic losses associated with disease in production birds. Currently available commercial vaccines are ineffective against new ARV variants and ARV outbreaks are increasing worldwide, requiring whole genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize strains that evade vaccines. This study compares the effectiveness of long-read and short-read sequencing technologies for obtaining ARV complete genomes. We used eight clinical isolates of ARV, each previously processed using our published viral genome enrichment protocol. Additionally, we evaluate three assembly methods to determine which provided the most complete and reliable whole genomes: <i>De novo</i>, reference-guided or hybrid. The results suggest that our ARV genome enrichment protocol caused some fragmentation of the viral cDNA that impacted the length of the long reads (but not the short reads) and, as a result, caused a failure to produce complete genomes via <i>de novo</i> assembly. Overall, we observed that regardless of the sequencing technology, the best quality assemblies were generated by mapping quality-trimmed reads to a custom reference genome. The custom reference genomes were in turn constructed with the publicly available ARV genomic segments that shared the highest sequence similarity with the contigs from short-read <i>de novo</i> assemblies. Hence, we conclude that short-read sequencing is the most suitable technology to combine with our ARV genome enrichment protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":73066,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","volume":"5 ","pages":"1498921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2025.1498921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since viruses are obligate intracellular pathogens, sequencing their genomes results in metagenomic data from both the virus and the host. Virology researchers are constantly seeking new, cost-effective strategies and bioinformatic pipelines for the retrieval of complete viral genomes from these metagenomic samples. Avian orthoreoviruses (ARVs) pose a significant and growing threat to the poultry industry and frequently cause economic losses associated with disease in production birds. Currently available commercial vaccines are ineffective against new ARV variants and ARV outbreaks are increasing worldwide, requiring whole genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize strains that evade vaccines. This study compares the effectiveness of long-read and short-read sequencing technologies for obtaining ARV complete genomes. We used eight clinical isolates of ARV, each previously processed using our published viral genome enrichment protocol. Additionally, we evaluate three assembly methods to determine which provided the most complete and reliable whole genomes: De novo, reference-guided or hybrid. The results suggest that our ARV genome enrichment protocol caused some fragmentation of the viral cDNA that impacted the length of the long reads (but not the short reads) and, as a result, caused a failure to produce complete genomes via de novo assembly. Overall, we observed that regardless of the sequencing technology, the best quality assemblies were generated by mapping quality-trimmed reads to a custom reference genome. The custom reference genomes were in turn constructed with the publicly available ARV genomic segments that shared the highest sequence similarity with the contigs from short-read de novo assemblies. Hence, we conclude that short-read sequencing is the most suitable technology to combine with our ARV genome enrichment protocol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phytochemical baicalin potentially inhibits Bcl-2 and VEGF: an in silico approach. Unlocking the potential of in silico approach in designing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Seurat function argument values in scRNA-seq data analysis: potential pitfalls and refinements for biological interpretation. Targeting aldose reductase using natural African compounds as promising agents for managing diabetic complications. Choosing the most suitable NGS technology to combine with a standardized viral enrichment protocol for obtaining complete avian orthoreovirus genomes from metagenomic samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1