Informed consent in dementia research: how Public Involvement can contribute to addressing "old" and "new" challenges.

Frontiers in dementia Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frdem.2025.1536762
Ana Diaz, Cindy Birck, Angela Bradshaw, Jean Georges, Daphne Lamirel, Soraya Moradi-Bachiller, Dianne Gove
{"title":"Informed consent in dementia research: how Public Involvement can contribute to addressing \"old\" and \"new\" challenges.","authors":"Ana Diaz, Cindy Birck, Angela Bradshaw, Jean Georges, Daphne Lamirel, Soraya Moradi-Bachiller, Dianne Gove","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2025.1536762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed consent is a critical ethical requirement in research, ensuring the protection of participants' rights and promoting their wellbeing and autonomy. In dementia research, this process becomes particularly complex due to cognitive impairments and fluctuating capacity. While substantial work has been done to address these challenges, much of the literature on informed consent in dementia research has been shaped by the perspectives of researchers and healthcare professionals, with less focus on those with lived experience. This paper provides an overview of the perspectives of people with dementia and their carers resulting from Public Involvement activities organized by Alzheimer Europe. It builds on Alzheimer Europe's previous work with the European Working Group of People with Dementia and draws on discussions held during a face-to-face meeting about Participant Informed Consent forms and processes used in two specific European projects. We highlight views and key concerns raised by people with lived experience regarding the informed consent process, including barriers and facilitators. In addition to ensuring understandability, the discussions emphasized the importance of promoting respect and autonomy, ensuring that the values and interests of people with lived experience remain central throughout the research process. This paper contributes to the ongoing dialogue on improving informed consent practices in dementia research, highlighting the need for continuous involvement and the inclusion of people with lived experience in shaping consent practices to address both old and emerging challenges (i.e., new types of research such as artificial intelligence and data sharing/re-use) in dementia research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520000,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dementia","volume":"4 ","pages":"1536762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2025.1536762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informed consent is a critical ethical requirement in research, ensuring the protection of participants' rights and promoting their wellbeing and autonomy. In dementia research, this process becomes particularly complex due to cognitive impairments and fluctuating capacity. While substantial work has been done to address these challenges, much of the literature on informed consent in dementia research has been shaped by the perspectives of researchers and healthcare professionals, with less focus on those with lived experience. This paper provides an overview of the perspectives of people with dementia and their carers resulting from Public Involvement activities organized by Alzheimer Europe. It builds on Alzheimer Europe's previous work with the European Working Group of People with Dementia and draws on discussions held during a face-to-face meeting about Participant Informed Consent forms and processes used in two specific European projects. We highlight views and key concerns raised by people with lived experience regarding the informed consent process, including barriers and facilitators. In addition to ensuring understandability, the discussions emphasized the importance of promoting respect and autonomy, ensuring that the values and interests of people with lived experience remain central throughout the research process. This paper contributes to the ongoing dialogue on improving informed consent practices in dementia research, highlighting the need for continuous involvement and the inclusion of people with lived experience in shaping consent practices to address both old and emerging challenges (i.e., new types of research such as artificial intelligence and data sharing/re-use) in dementia research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆研究中的知情同意:公众参与如何有助于应对“旧”和“新”挑战。
知情同意在研究中是一项关键的伦理要求,确保保护参与者的权利,促进他们的福祉和自主权。在痴呆症研究中,由于认知障碍和能力波动,这一过程变得特别复杂。虽然已经做了大量的工作来应对这些挑战,但许多关于痴呆症研究中的知情同意的文献都是由研究人员和医疗保健专业人员的观点塑造的,很少关注那些有生活经验的人。本文概述了痴呆症患者及其护理人员的观点,这些观点是由阿尔茨海默病欧洲组织的公众参与活动产生的。它建立在欧洲阿尔茨海默病协会以前与欧洲痴呆症患者工作组合作的基础上,并借鉴了在面对面会议上就两个具体欧洲项目中使用的参与者知情同意书和流程进行的讨论。我们强调了有生活经验的人对知情同意过程提出的观点和主要关切,包括障碍和促进者。除了确保可理解性之外,讨论还强调了促进尊重和自主的重要性,确保在整个研究过程中始终以有实际经验的人的价值观和利益为中心。本文为正在进行的关于改善痴呆症研究中知情同意实践的对话做出了贡献,强调需要持续参与和包括有生活经验的人来塑造同意实践,以应对痴呆症研究中旧的和新出现的挑战(即人工智能和数据共享/重用等新型研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From mild behavioral impairment-checklist (MBI-C) to MBI-distress (MBI-D): a paired assessment and clinical correlates of domain-specific caregiver distress in MCI due to AD. New perspectives on peer support in an online intervention for family carers of people living with dementia-evidence from an Irish NGO. Dementia and hearing loss: from risk to mechanisms and management. Access to healthcare services and adherence to treatments for people with dementia among ethnic minority groups: a scoping review. Clinical, social, molecular, and genetic predictors of cognitive resilience in long-living adults without dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1