Dismantle structural barriers to improve reproductive healthcare for racially minoritised women

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r277
Danielle Solomon
{"title":"Dismantle structural barriers to improve reproductive healthcare for racially minoritised women","authors":"Danielle Solomon","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reproductive justice requires an intersectional approach, says Danielle Solomon Over the past decade inequities in reproductive outcomes among racially minoritised women have increasingly become a part of public health discourse. This is largely because of widespread advocacy efforts led by organisations such as Five x More1 and the Reproductive Justice Initiative.2 It is an area that was the subject of a feature in the 2020 BMJ Racism in Medicine series,3 and it is just as relevant in this series, five years later. If we are to tackle these inequities, it is crucial that decision makers understand the complex, structural drivers of reproductive health inequality. One of the key statistics—often at the forefront of this discourse—is the disparity in maternal mortality between black and white women. In the UK, women of black ethnicity are twice as likely to die during pregnancy and the neonatal period as white women, and the maternal mortality risk among Asian women is also higher than in white women.4 This is just the tip of the iceberg—racial inequity stretches across the entirety of reproductive health. Risk of miscarriage is …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive justice requires an intersectional approach, says Danielle Solomon Over the past decade inequities in reproductive outcomes among racially minoritised women have increasingly become a part of public health discourse. This is largely because of widespread advocacy efforts led by organisations such as Five x More1 and the Reproductive Justice Initiative.2 It is an area that was the subject of a feature in the 2020 BMJ Racism in Medicine series,3 and it is just as relevant in this series, five years later. If we are to tackle these inequities, it is crucial that decision makers understand the complex, structural drivers of reproductive health inequality. One of the key statistics—often at the forefront of this discourse—is the disparity in maternal mortality between black and white women. In the UK, women of black ethnicity are twice as likely to die during pregnancy and the neonatal period as white women, and the maternal mortality risk among Asian women is also higher than in white women.4 This is just the tip of the iceberg—racial inequity stretches across the entirety of reproductive health. Risk of miscarriage is …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除结构性障碍,改善少数族裔妇女的生殖保健
丹妮尔·所罗门(Danielle Solomon)说,生殖正义需要一种交叉的方法。在过去十年中,少数族裔妇女生育结果的不平等日益成为公共卫生话语的一部分。这在很大程度上是因为Five x More1和生殖正义倡议(Reproductive Justice initiative)等组织领导的广泛倡导努力。这是2020年《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)医学种族主义系列文章的一个专题主题,5年后的这个系列也同样如此。如果我们要解决这些不平等问题,决策者必须了解生殖健康不平等的复杂结构性驱动因素。其中一个关键的统计数据——经常是这个话题的前沿——是黑人和白人妇女之间孕产妇死亡率的差异。在英国,黑人妇女在怀孕和新生儿期间的死亡率是白人妇女的两倍,亚洲妇女的孕产妇死亡率也高于白人妇女这只是冰山一角——种族不平等已经延伸到整个生殖健康领域。流产的风险是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
British drug company leaves self-regulation after staff blew whistle on patient safety concerns. New exam finds one third of Brazilian final year medical students below proficiency. Widening the lens: genetic testing barriers risk compounding prostate cancer inequalities. Efforts to get more working class doctors is "window dressing" without tackling debt crisis, leaders warn. A budget apart: the case for ringfencing medicines in the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1