Qualitative analytics from stakeholder perspective describes the biopsychosocial model for patient-centred approach to managing psychiatric ailments

Abhishek Cukkemane , Rene Hurlemann , Veralia Gabriela Sanchez
{"title":"Qualitative analytics from stakeholder perspective describes the biopsychosocial model for patient-centred approach to managing psychiatric ailments","authors":"Abhishek Cukkemane ,&nbsp;Rene Hurlemann ,&nbsp;Veralia Gabriela Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic mental illnesses (CMIs) such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders, to name a few are psychiatric disorders poses significant burden to both patients and healthcare systems. The public policy and management of such complex set of spectral disorders often includes procedures and regulations, pharmacological treatments, psychotherapy, and social support. However, these approaches frequently fail to fully address patient requirements, leading to inadequate care and poor outcomes. Therefore, by conducting interviews and synthesizing insights from various stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals, the study investigates the multi-dimensional challenges in CMI management. This report of qualitative analysis explores a patient-centric approach towards three main themes in managing CMIs such as, tasks related to diagnosis, challenges with current procedures, and expectations from newer diagnostic methodologies. Key themes emerged revolving around requirements for emotional care, trust, complexity, and the integration of technology in treatment. Our findings highlight the need for personalized care strategies that encompass biological, psychological, and social dimensions with emphasis on effective communication and resource management. The study underscores the potential of a holistic, patient-centred framework, which serendipitously parallels George Engel's biopsychosocial model to improve outcomes and address the multifaceted nature of spectral psychiatric disorders. In the light of newer emerging technologies and the demands for psychometric intervention, perhaps, we suggest revisiting the model for a comprehensive approach in policy-making, health care management and patient-centric support to address these challenges effectively</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532500023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic mental illnesses (CMIs) such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders, to name a few are psychiatric disorders poses significant burden to both patients and healthcare systems. The public policy and management of such complex set of spectral disorders often includes procedures and regulations, pharmacological treatments, psychotherapy, and social support. However, these approaches frequently fail to fully address patient requirements, leading to inadequate care and poor outcomes. Therefore, by conducting interviews and synthesizing insights from various stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals, the study investigates the multi-dimensional challenges in CMI management. This report of qualitative analysis explores a patient-centric approach towards three main themes in managing CMIs such as, tasks related to diagnosis, challenges with current procedures, and expectations from newer diagnostic methodologies. Key themes emerged revolving around requirements for emotional care, trust, complexity, and the integration of technology in treatment. Our findings highlight the need for personalized care strategies that encompass biological, psychological, and social dimensions with emphasis on effective communication and resource management. The study underscores the potential of a holistic, patient-centred framework, which serendipitously parallels George Engel's biopsychosocial model to improve outcomes and address the multifaceted nature of spectral psychiatric disorders. In the light of newer emerging technologies and the demands for psychometric intervention, perhaps, we suggest revisiting the model for a comprehensive approach in policy-making, health care management and patient-centric support to address these challenges effectively
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Qualitative analytics from stakeholder perspective describes the biopsychosocial model for patient-centred approach to managing psychiatric ailments Identification of neurophysiological signatures of bipolar disorder by resting-state EEG microstate analysis The genetic overlap between major depressive disorder, white blood cell counts and interleukin 6 The prevalence of mental health and psychosocial concerns among South African student-athletes Plasma BDNF in burnout-related depressive disorders: The mediating role of perceived social isolation and the biopsychological effect of a multimodal inpatient treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1