Effects of restrictive abortion legislation on cohort mortality evidence from 19th century law variation

IF 3.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Public Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105329
Joanna N. Lahey , Marianne H. Wanamaker
{"title":"Effects of restrictive abortion legislation on cohort mortality evidence from 19th century law variation","authors":"Joanna N. Lahey ,&nbsp;Marianne H. Wanamaker","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Permissive abortion policy is thought to improve the average well-being of born children, as evidenced by recent studies based on 20th century US data. Using 19th century restrictive abortion policy, we demonstrate a more nuanced relationship between policy and child well-being. Despite increased birth rates among abortion-restricted cohorts, we find little evidence of changes in well-being at birth through the standard channel of child selection, consistent with predictions from a generalized model. However, children in these larger cohorts were more susceptible to mortality from infectious disease throughout childhood, implying different mechanisms linking abortion policy to child well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 105329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725000271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permissive abortion policy is thought to improve the average well-being of born children, as evidenced by recent studies based on 20th century US data. Using 19th century restrictive abortion policy, we demonstrate a more nuanced relationship between policy and child well-being. Despite increased birth rates among abortion-restricted cohorts, we find little evidence of changes in well-being at birth through the standard channel of child selection, consistent with predictions from a generalized model. However, children in these larger cohorts were more susceptible to mortality from infectious disease throughout childhood, implying different mechanisms linking abortion policy to child well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制性堕胎立法对群体死亡率的影响——来自19世纪法律变化的证据
最近基于20世纪美国数据的研究证明,宽松的堕胎政策被认为能提高出生儿童的平均福祉。利用19世纪的限制性堕胎政策,我们展示了政策与儿童福祉之间更微妙的关系。尽管限制堕胎人群的出生率有所提高,但我们发现很少有证据表明,通过儿童选择的标准渠道,出生时的幸福感发生了变化,这与广义模型的预测相一致。然而,在这些较大的队列中,儿童在整个童年时期更容易死于传染病,这意味着将堕胎政策与儿童福祉联系起来的机制不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.
期刊最新文献
Ranking for engagement: How social media algorithms fuel misinformation and polarization Climate coalitions with sophisticated policy makers Race and redistribution in the United States: An experimental analysis Emergency care centers, hospital performance and population health Political accountability and bureaucratic selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1