Sustainable future orientation for BRICS+ nations: Green growth, political stability, renewable energy and technology for ecological footprint mitigation

IF 9.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122701
Litu Sethi , Ugur Korkut Pata , Biswanath Behera , Malayaranjan Sahoo , Narayan Sethi
{"title":"Sustainable future orientation for BRICS+ nations: Green growth, political stability, renewable energy and technology for ecological footprint mitigation","authors":"Litu Sethi ,&nbsp;Ugur Korkut Pata ,&nbsp;Biswanath Behera ,&nbsp;Malayaranjan Sahoo ,&nbsp;Narayan Sethi","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2025.122701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The BRICS + countries are developing rapidly and generating large amounts of ecological footprint (EFP). For a sustainable global ecosystem, it is crucial to minimize EFP, especially in populous countries such as India and China. Therefore, this study examines the impact of green growth, political stability, social globalization, renewable energy (REN), financial development and ICT on the EFP in the newly formed BRICS + countries from 2000 to 2020 using nonlinear ARDL. The novelty of the study is that it tests the asymmetric effects of green growth on the EFP for the BRICS + countries. The results unveil intriguing asymmetries: Positive shocks to green growth and REN mitigate EFP, while negative shocks to green growth initially reduce it but then increase it. Similarly, positive shocks to political stability and REN are associated with a reduction in EFP, while negative shocks exacerbate it. Remarkably, social globalization exhibits an asymmetric effect on EFP in response to positive and negative shocks. In addition, ICT displays an asymmetric effect and increases the EFP in the BRICS + nations. These findings suggests that the BRICS + bloc, which is one of the world's highest fossil fuel consumers, should use REN to displace fossil fuels with a REN based power generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 122701"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125003635","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The BRICS + countries are developing rapidly and generating large amounts of ecological footprint (EFP). For a sustainable global ecosystem, it is crucial to minimize EFP, especially in populous countries such as India and China. Therefore, this study examines the impact of green growth, political stability, social globalization, renewable energy (REN), financial development and ICT on the EFP in the newly formed BRICS + countries from 2000 to 2020 using nonlinear ARDL. The novelty of the study is that it tests the asymmetric effects of green growth on the EFP for the BRICS + countries. The results unveil intriguing asymmetries: Positive shocks to green growth and REN mitigate EFP, while negative shocks to green growth initially reduce it but then increase it. Similarly, positive shocks to political stability and REN are associated with a reduction in EFP, while negative shocks exacerbate it. Remarkably, social globalization exhibits an asymmetric effect on EFP in response to positive and negative shocks. In addition, ICT displays an asymmetric effect and increases the EFP in the BRICS + nations. These findings suggests that the BRICS + bloc, which is one of the world's highest fossil fuel consumers, should use REN to displace fossil fuels with a REN based power generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“金砖五国+”的可持续未来方向:绿色增长、政治稳定、可再生能源和减少生态足迹的技术
“金砖五国+”发展迅速,产生了大量生态足迹。为了实现可持续的全球生态系统,将EFP降至最低至关重要,尤其是在印度和中国等人口众多的国家。因此,本研究利用非线性ARDL分析了2000年至2020年绿色增长、政治稳定、社会全球化、可再生能源、金融发展和信息通信技术对新成立的金砖+国家EFP的影响。该研究的新颖之处在于,它检验了绿色增长对金砖五国+国家EFP的不对称影响。结果揭示了有趣的不对称性:对绿色增长和REN的正面冲击会减缓EFP,而对绿色增长的负面冲击会先减少EFP,然后增加EFP。同样,对政治稳定和REN的正面冲击与EFP的减少有关,而负面冲击则加剧了EFP的减少。值得注意的是,社会全球化在积极冲击和消极冲击下对EFP表现出不对称的影响。此外,信息通信技术还表现出不对称效应,增加了金砖国家+的EFP。这些发现表明,金砖国家+集团是世界上最大的化石燃料消费国之一,应该使用可再生能源以可再生能源发电取代化石燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Two-stage solid-state anaerobic digestion of highland barley straw with liquid fraction of digestate and calcium oxide pretreatment: Performance and microbial community analysis Shaping the future energy system through renewable integration and hydrogen adoption: the case of Lazio region in Italy Runaway numerical investigation of a six-nozzle model Pelton turbine- A case with emphasis on transient flow and energy transportation analysis Technical design with environmental aspects of newly solar-wind hybrid power generation with desalination using multi stage flash- reverse osmosis Co-pyrolysis and chemical looping co-gasification of rice straw and agricultural plastics for hydrogen and power generation: Experimental study and life cycle assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1