Analysis of the government environmental attention on tackling air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions through a spatial econometric approach

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107866
Siqi Yu , Xinyu Yang , Zhongyao Cai , Liyang Guo , Ping Jiang
{"title":"Analysis of the government environmental attention on tackling air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions through a spatial econometric approach","authors":"Siqi Yu ,&nbsp;Xinyu Yang ,&nbsp;Zhongyao Cai ,&nbsp;Liyang Guo ,&nbsp;Ping Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The government plays a significant role in environmental management in China. By using data from 274 Chinese prefecture-level cities spanning 2008 to 2020, this study innovatively explores the influence of government environmental attention (GEA) on cutting PM<sub>2.5</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Unlike previous works, this study focuses on three aspects. First, GEA is quantified, and its significant impact on driving emission reductions is analyzed using the spatial Durbin model. This method captures spatial spillover effects and inter-regional dependencies, offering a more precise and comprehensive understanding of strategic government preferences for reducing air pollutant emissions. Second, this study uncovers spatial heterogeneity in the effectiveness of GEA, underscoring the necessity for region-specific policies and the accelerated construction of national carbon emission trading scheme. Additionally, this study reveals the moderating effect of local government officials' personal characteristics on the linkage between GEA and emission reduction outcomes. To maximize the co-benefits of controlling both air pollution and carbon emissions effectively, policies are recommended based on outcomes of study, such as the measure of collaborative control should be promoted, the heterogeneity of regional development should be addressed in future policy design and implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 107866"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The government plays a significant role in environmental management in China. By using data from 274 Chinese prefecture-level cities spanning 2008 to 2020, this study innovatively explores the influence of government environmental attention (GEA) on cutting PM2.5 and CO2 emissions. Unlike previous works, this study focuses on three aspects. First, GEA is quantified, and its significant impact on driving emission reductions is analyzed using the spatial Durbin model. This method captures spatial spillover effects and inter-regional dependencies, offering a more precise and comprehensive understanding of strategic government preferences for reducing air pollutant emissions. Second, this study uncovers spatial heterogeneity in the effectiveness of GEA, underscoring the necessity for region-specific policies and the accelerated construction of national carbon emission trading scheme. Additionally, this study reveals the moderating effect of local government officials' personal characteristics on the linkage between GEA and emission reduction outcomes. To maximize the co-benefits of controlling both air pollution and carbon emissions effectively, policies are recommended based on outcomes of study, such as the measure of collaborative control should be promoted, the heterogeneity of regional development should be addressed in future policy design and implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the government environmental attention on tackling air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions through a spatial econometric approach Editorial Board Non-compliant measurement leads to significant misestimation in national carbon tariff: Methodology and a retrospective case study of China Freshwater biodiversity risk exposure of Natura 2000 sites to industrial pollution A deep learning-based study on visual quality assessment of commercial renovation of Chinese traditional building facades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1