Hemodynamics modeling with physics-informed neural networks: A progressive boundary complexity approach

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2025.117851
Xi Chen , Jianchuan Yang , Xu Liu , Yong He , Qiang Luo , Mao Chen , Wenqi Hu
{"title":"Hemodynamics modeling with physics-informed neural networks: A progressive boundary complexity approach","authors":"Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Jianchuan Yang ,&nbsp;Xu Liu ,&nbsp;Yong He ,&nbsp;Qiang Luo ,&nbsp;Mao Chen ,&nbsp;Wenqi Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.cma.2025.117851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hemodynamic analysis is essential for assessing cardiovascular health. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, while precise, are computationally expensive and lack transfer learning capabilities, requiring recalculation for varying boundaries. Machine-learning methods, despite powerful data-fitting abilities, heavily rely on labeled datasets, limiting their use in clinical settings where data is scarce. To alleviate data dependency, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed physical laws directly into the loss function, allowing model parameter transfer across varying geometries. However, traditional PINNs struggle with complex domains like stenosed vessels, leading to inefficiency and reduced accuracy. To tackle this challenge, we propose the Boundary Progressive PINN (BP-PINN). By introducing boundary complexity, BP-PINN reconstructs vascular boundaries at varying smoothness levels. Training begins with simple models and progressively incorporating boundary details to capture complex flow characteristics. Without any labeled data, BP-PINN was successfully applied to 22 patient-specific cases, achieving L2 errors of 0.036 for velocity and 0.057 for pressure compared to CFD ground truth. Furthermore, compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR), the invasive gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia, the non-invasive FFR predicted by BP-PINN attained the highest overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.9 %, outperforming vanilla-PINNs (81.8 %). Additionally, BP-PINN leveraged pretrained models with similar boundary complexities, enabling efficient stent preoperative planning. The proposed method evaluated the effects of five stenting strategies on the hemodynamic environment, achieving an average computation time of under 3 min per case. Finally, the framework was extended to solve heat equation, Poisson equation and Helmholtz equation in irregular domains, demonstrating superior accuracy compared to baseline methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55222,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","volume":"438 ","pages":"Article 117851"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782525001239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodynamic analysis is essential for assessing cardiovascular health. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, while precise, are computationally expensive and lack transfer learning capabilities, requiring recalculation for varying boundaries. Machine-learning methods, despite powerful data-fitting abilities, heavily rely on labeled datasets, limiting their use in clinical settings where data is scarce. To alleviate data dependency, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed physical laws directly into the loss function, allowing model parameter transfer across varying geometries. However, traditional PINNs struggle with complex domains like stenosed vessels, leading to inefficiency and reduced accuracy. To tackle this challenge, we propose the Boundary Progressive PINN (BP-PINN). By introducing boundary complexity, BP-PINN reconstructs vascular boundaries at varying smoothness levels. Training begins with simple models and progressively incorporating boundary details to capture complex flow characteristics. Without any labeled data, BP-PINN was successfully applied to 22 patient-specific cases, achieving L2 errors of 0.036 for velocity and 0.057 for pressure compared to CFD ground truth. Furthermore, compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR), the invasive gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia, the non-invasive FFR predicted by BP-PINN attained the highest overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.9 %, outperforming vanilla-PINNs (81.8 %). Additionally, BP-PINN leveraged pretrained models with similar boundary complexities, enabling efficient stent preoperative planning. The proposed method evaluated the effects of five stenting strategies on the hemodynamic environment, achieving an average computation time of under 3 min per case. Finally, the framework was extended to solve heat equation, Poisson equation and Helmholtz equation in irregular domains, demonstrating superior accuracy compared to baseline methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于物理信息的神经网络的血流动力学建模:一种渐进式边界复杂性方法
血液动力学分析对评估心血管健康至关重要。计算流体动力学(CFD)方法虽然精确,但计算成本高,缺乏迁移学习能力,需要对不同的边界进行重新计算。机器学习方法尽管具有强大的数据拟合能力,但严重依赖于标记数据集,限制了它们在数据稀缺的临床环境中的使用。为了减轻数据依赖性,物理信息神经网络(pinn)将物理定律直接嵌入到损失函数中,允许模型参数在不同几何形状之间传递。然而,传统的pinn难以处理血管狭窄等复杂领域,导致效率低下和准确性降低。为了解决这一挑战,我们提出了边界渐进式PINN (BP-PINN)。BP-PINN通过引入边界复杂度来重建不同平滑程度的血管边界。训练开始与简单的模型和逐步纳入边界细节,以捕捉复杂的流动特征。在没有任何标记数据的情况下,BP-PINN成功应用于22例患者特定病例,与CFD地面真实值相比,速度和压力的L2误差分别为0.036和0.057。此外,与诊断心肌缺血的有创金标准分数血流储备(FFR)相比,BP-PINN预测的无创FFR的总体诊断准确率最高,为90.9%,优于香草- pinn(81.8%)。此外,BP-PINN利用具有相似边界复杂性的预训练模型,实现有效的支架术前规划。该方法评估了五种支架术对血流动力学环境的影响,平均计算时间在每例3分钟以下。最后,将该框架扩展到求解不规则域的热方程、泊松方程和亥姆霍兹方程,与基线方法相比,显示出更高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
15.30%
发文量
719
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering stands as a cornerstone in the realm of computational science and engineering. With a history spanning over five decades, the journal has been a key platform for disseminating papers on advanced mathematical modeling and numerical solutions. Interdisciplinary in nature, these contributions encompass mechanics, mathematics, computer science, and various scientific disciplines. The journal welcomes a broad range of computational methods addressing the simulation, analysis, and design of complex physical problems, making it a vital resource for researchers in the field.
期刊最新文献
p-multigrid method for the discontinuous Galerkin discretization of elliptic problems with discontinuous coefficients A relaxed Lagrange multiplier approach for phase field models Neural network methods for Neumann series problems of Perron-Frobenius operators Sparse source identification in transient advection-diffusion problems with a primal-dual-active-point strategy Latent attention operator network with augmented representation for complex PDE systems in intricate geometries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1