Oral nutritional supplementation in cancer patients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.011
Sajedeh Habibi , Sepide Talebi , Darya Khosravinia , Hamed Mohammadi
{"title":"Oral nutritional supplementation in cancer patients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis","authors":"Sajedeh Habibi ,&nbsp;Sepide Talebi ,&nbsp;Darya Khosravinia ,&nbsp;Hamed Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>We performed this systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in cancer patients undergoing chemo (radio) therapy on body weight, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) score and C-reactive protein (CRP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Appropriate search terms were used for systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, till April 2024. Both pairwise and dose–response meta-analyses were done. Random effects model was applied for analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found that ONS administration significantly improved weight gain [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.18 kg; 95 % CI, 0.20 to 2.17, <em>P</em> = 0.019; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 56.2 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub> = 0.002], fatigue scores [standard mean difference (SMD): −1.45; 95 % CI, −2.48 to −0.42, <em>P</em> = 0.006; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 90.1 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub>&lt; 0.001], PG-SGA scores (WMD: −1.11; 95 % CI, −2.93 to 0.70, <em>P</em> = 0.229; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 72.4 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub> = 0.001), and QOL (SMD: 1.38; 95 % CI, 0.45 to 2.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 94.4 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub>&lt; 0.001). The dose–response meta-analysis found a significant relationship between each 200 ml/d increase in ONS and improvement in fatigue (SMD: −7.30; 95 % CI, −10.17 to −4.42, P &lt; 0.001; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 97 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub>&lt; 0.001) and QOL scores (SMD:7.01; 95 % CI, 3.89 to 10.12, P = 0.001; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 98.3 %, <em>P</em><sub><em>Q-test</em></sub> &lt; 0.001). Based on a non-linear dose–response meta-analysis, the most significant reduction in fatigue was observed at ONS dosages of ≥400 ml/day, while the most significant improvement in QOL score was seen at ≥ 500 ml/day dosages. Our analysis also showed a significant association between higher albumin levels and ONS intake of ≥200 ml daily.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, ONS can help improve various cancer-related complications; however, further good-quality research is still needed. The study found that ONS significantly improves QoL, reduces fatigue, and promotes body weight gain in cancer patients. However, there were no significant effects on BMI, serum albumin, CRP, or PG-SGA scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 28-39"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

We performed this systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in cancer patients undergoing chemo (radio) therapy on body weight, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) score and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Methods

Appropriate search terms were used for systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, till April 2024. Both pairwise and dose–response meta-analyses were done. Random effects model was applied for analyses.

Results

We found that ONS administration significantly improved weight gain [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.18 kg; 95 % CI, 0.20 to 2.17, P = 0.019; I2 = 56.2 %, PQ-test = 0.002], fatigue scores [standard mean difference (SMD): −1.45; 95 % CI, −2.48 to −0.42, P = 0.006; I2 = 90.1 %, PQ-test< 0.001], PG-SGA scores (WMD: −1.11; 95 % CI, −2.93 to 0.70, P = 0.229; I2 = 72.4 %, PQ-test = 0.001), and QOL (SMD: 1.38; 95 % CI, 0.45 to 2.31; P < 0.001; I2 = 94.4 %, PQ-test< 0.001). The dose–response meta-analysis found a significant relationship between each 200 ml/d increase in ONS and improvement in fatigue (SMD: −7.30; 95 % CI, −10.17 to −4.42, P < 0.001; I2 = 97 %, PQ-test< 0.001) and QOL scores (SMD:7.01; 95 % CI, 3.89 to 10.12, P = 0.001; I2 = 98.3 %, PQ-test < 0.001). Based on a non-linear dose–response meta-analysis, the most significant reduction in fatigue was observed at ONS dosages of ≥400 ml/day, while the most significant improvement in QOL score was seen at ≥ 500 ml/day dosages. Our analysis also showed a significant association between higher albumin levels and ONS intake of ≥200 ml daily.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ONS can help improve various cancer-related complications; however, further good-quality research is still needed. The study found that ONS significantly improves QoL, reduces fatigue, and promotes body weight gain in cancer patients. However, there were no significant effects on BMI, serum albumin, CRP, or PG-SGA scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
Letter to Editor–Effects of high-fat, low-carbohydrate enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis Real-world experience of Teduglutide use in adults with short bowel syndrome: A seven-year international multicenter survey An umbrella review of meta-analyses on the effects of microbial therapy in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease Evidence-based dietary recommendations for patients with psoriasis: A systematic review Oral nutritional supplementation in cancer patients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1