Mind the standardization gap: An emerging market phenomenon

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115249
Zeynep Müge Güzel , Ayşegül Özsomer , Burcu Sezen
{"title":"Mind the standardization gap: An emerging market phenomenon","authors":"Zeynep Müge Güzel ,&nbsp;Ayşegül Özsomer ,&nbsp;Burcu Sezen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces the “standardization gap” as perceptual differences between consumers and managers regarding a global brand’s standardization of its marketing mix. Studies utilizing triadic data from managers, consumers, and advertisements document that emerging market consumers perceive global brands as less standardized than they are. A perceived “standardization gap” exists in product characteristics and positioning. Positioning standardization gaps decrease consumers’ brand equity, willingness to pay, and the brand’s market share in the subsidiary market. Interestingly, consumers’ product standardization perceptions trigger two opposing mechanisms, a positive mechanism via better tailoring to local needs and a negative mechanism through inferences of lower quality and inferior products. These opposing mechanisms cancel each other out in affecting consumer brand equity. Managers can enhance positioning standardization perceptions by standardizing advertising in emerging markets. However, standardized advertising is less effective in shaping product standardization perceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 115249"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the “standardization gap” as perceptual differences between consumers and managers regarding a global brand’s standardization of its marketing mix. Studies utilizing triadic data from managers, consumers, and advertisements document that emerging market consumers perceive global brands as less standardized than they are. A perceived “standardization gap” exists in product characteristics and positioning. Positioning standardization gaps decrease consumers’ brand equity, willingness to pay, and the brand’s market share in the subsidiary market. Interestingly, consumers’ product standardization perceptions trigger two opposing mechanisms, a positive mechanism via better tailoring to local needs and a negative mechanism through inferences of lower quality and inferior products. These opposing mechanisms cancel each other out in affecting consumer brand equity. Managers can enhance positioning standardization perceptions by standardizing advertising in emerging markets. However, standardized advertising is less effective in shaping product standardization perceptions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意标准化差距:一个新兴市场现象
本文介绍了“标准化差距”,即消费者和管理者对全球品牌营销组合标准化的感知差异。利用来自管理者、消费者和广告的三元数据进行的研究表明,新兴市场消费者认为全球品牌的标准化程度不如他们。在产品特性和定位方面存在明显的“标准化差距”。定位标准化差距降低了消费者的品牌资产、支付意愿和品牌在附属市场的市场份额。有趣的是,消费者对产品标准化的认知触发了两种相反的机制,一种是通过更好地根据当地需求进行定制而产生的积极机制,另一种是通过推断产品质量较低和质量低劣而产生的消极机制。这些对立的机制在影响消费者品牌资产时相互抵消。管理者可以通过标准化新兴市场的广告来增强定位标准化认知。然而,标准化广告在塑造产品标准化观念方面效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
To balance between efficiency and fairness: leveraging CSR as optimal distinctive instrument Understanding Gen Z consumers’ perceptions of sustainable fashion clothing:a PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach How moral brand transgressions impact perceptions of social media message credibility Racial and ethnic differences in entrepreneurship When size doesn’t matter: The impact of unexpected surcharges on consumer reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1