Geographical variation in parental calls contextually shapes nestling songbird responses

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Animal Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123114
Samyuktha Rajan, Lan Ma, Mario Gallego-Abenza, Fanny-Linn H. Kraft, David Wheatcroft
{"title":"Geographical variation in parental calls contextually shapes nestling songbird responses","authors":"Samyuktha Rajan,&nbsp;Lan Ma,&nbsp;Mario Gallego-Abenza,&nbsp;Fanny-Linn H. Kraft,&nbsp;David Wheatcroft","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In species expressing parental care, juveniles often utilize cues from their parents to distinguish between safe and dangerous situations. For example, nestling songbirds beg in response to parental feeding cues but stop vocalizing in response to parental alarm calls. Previous studies have shown that nestling birds discriminate between calls of their own and other species. However, it is unknown whether and how nestlings discriminate call variation across populations within their own species. Adult pied flycatchers, <em>Ficedula hypoleuca</em>, produce acoustically identical calls at a fast rate when a predator is nearby, and slowly during feeding visits, potentially signalling the level of danger near the nest. Taking advantage of this functional duality, our study examines whether nestling discrimination of call variation across populations depends on the context in which they are produced. In response to rapidly repeated predator-associated calls, we found that nestlings reduced begging activity similarly, whether calls were from local or foreign populations. Conversely, in response to slowly repeated feeding-associated calls, nestlings begged more in response to local than foreign conspecific calls. Our results show that nestlings discriminate within-species call variation but adjust their response threshold depending on the call context, which we argue may optimize their begging activity in order to get fed, while simultaneously avoiding predation. This study underscores the importance of studying the effects of within-species variation in nonmating signals, such as calls, on songbird behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 123114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In species expressing parental care, juveniles often utilize cues from their parents to distinguish between safe and dangerous situations. For example, nestling songbirds beg in response to parental feeding cues but stop vocalizing in response to parental alarm calls. Previous studies have shown that nestling birds discriminate between calls of their own and other species. However, it is unknown whether and how nestlings discriminate call variation across populations within their own species. Adult pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, produce acoustically identical calls at a fast rate when a predator is nearby, and slowly during feeding visits, potentially signalling the level of danger near the nest. Taking advantage of this functional duality, our study examines whether nestling discrimination of call variation across populations depends on the context in which they are produced. In response to rapidly repeated predator-associated calls, we found that nestlings reduced begging activity similarly, whether calls were from local or foreign populations. Conversely, in response to slowly repeated feeding-associated calls, nestlings begged more in response to local than foreign conspecific calls. Our results show that nestlings discriminate within-species call variation but adjust their response threshold depending on the call context, which we argue may optimize their begging activity in order to get fed, while simultaneously avoiding predation. This study underscores the importance of studying the effects of within-species variation in nonmating signals, such as calls, on songbird behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母叫声的地理差异在语境中塑造了雏鸟的反应
在表达父母关爱的物种中,幼崽经常利用父母的暗示来区分安全和危险的情况。例如,雏鸟会对父母的喂食提示做出乞求,但对父母的警报呼叫却停止发声。先前的研究表明,雏鸟可以区分自己的叫声和其他物种的叫声。然而,尚不清楚雏鸟是否以及如何在自己的物种中区分不同种群的叫声。成年斑蝇,Ficedula hypoleuca,当捕食者在附近时,会以较快的速度发出声音,而在喂食时则会发出缓慢的叫声,这可能表明鸟巢附近的危险程度。利用这种功能的二元性,我们的研究考察了种群间叫声变异的雏鸟歧视是否取决于它们产生的环境。我们发现,对于快速重复的与捕食者相关的叫声,雏鸟同样减少了乞讨活动,无论是来自本地还是外国种群的叫声。相反,在对缓慢重复的喂食相关的叫声做出反应时,雏鸟对本地叫声的乞求多于对外来同种叫声的乞求。我们的研究结果表明,雏鸟会区分物种内的叫声变化,但会根据叫声环境调整它们的反应阈值,我们认为这可能会优化它们的乞讨活动,以获得食物,同时避免被捕食。这项研究强调了研究非交配信号(如叫声)对鸣禽行为的影响在种内变化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
期刊最新文献
Social tolerance mediates social learning in wild red-fronted lemurs, Eulemur rufifrons, and ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta Orang-utans and chimpanzees cooperate strategically based on the partner’s incentives Vocal and display differences in an island form of a lekking species with an acrobatic dance routine The influence of the relationship between male suckers and female hindlegs on mating in the diving beetle Eretes griseus Hunger affects cleaning, signalling and signal reliability in the cleaner shrimp Ancylomenes pedersoni
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1