Harmonizing HTA Evidence Needs and Expectations: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Evidence Generation, Ensure Access and Affordability

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3579
Sarah K. Emond, Wim G. Goettsch, Daniel A. Ollendorf
{"title":"Harmonizing HTA Evidence Needs and Expectations: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Evidence Generation, Ensure Access and Affordability","authors":"Sarah K. Emond,&nbsp;Wim G. Goettsch,&nbsp;Daniel A. Ollendorf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conducting high-quality health technology assessments requires high-quality evidence. With evolving regulatory standards for faster approval of new pharmaceutical products, health technology practitioners often find that the evidence base available to inform their work is lacking. This review article provides case examples of how health technology assessors have grappled with this tension, from the United States and European perspective, including experiences with new therapies for large populations, such as Alzheimer's disease, and gene therapies for ultra-rare conditions. The article concludes by offering some potential policy solutions that can meet the goals of robust evidence generation, patient access, and system affordability, including reimbursement with evidence development, outcomes-based contracts, and other types of managed entry agreements.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"117 4","pages":"938-945"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conducting high-quality health technology assessments requires high-quality evidence. With evolving regulatory standards for faster approval of new pharmaceutical products, health technology practitioners often find that the evidence base available to inform their work is lacking. This review article provides case examples of how health technology assessors have grappled with this tension, from the United States and European perspective, including experiences with new therapies for large populations, such as Alzheimer's disease, and gene therapies for ultra-rare conditions. The article concludes by offering some potential policy solutions that can meet the goals of robust evidence generation, patient access, and system affordability, including reimbursement with evidence development, outcomes-based contracts, and other types of managed entry agreements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协调HTA证据需求和期望:改善证据生成、确保可及性和可负担性的挑战和机遇。
开展高质量的卫生技术评估需要高质量的证据。随着加快批准新药品的监管标准的不断发展,卫生技术从业人员经常发现缺乏可用于指导其工作的证据基础。这篇综述文章从美国和欧洲的角度提供了卫生技术评估人员如何应对这种紧张关系的案例,包括针对大量人群的新疗法(如阿尔茨海默病)和针对超罕见疾病的基因疗法的经验。文章最后提出了一些潜在的政策解决方案,这些解决方案可以实现强有力的证据生成、患者可及性和系统可负担性的目标,包括证据开发报销、基于结果的合同和其他类型的管理准入协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
From Global Impact to Pharmacoequity: A Call to Action for Clinical Pharmacology. Drug Loss in Japan: A Comparative Analysis with Europe for New Drugs Developed by Emerging Biopharma Companies. Pediatric Hepatic Impairment Dosing in FDA Approvals Between 2002 and 2024. Emulating Six Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Antidiabetic Drugs in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses Based on Real-World Databases from Korea and Taiwan. Off-the-Shelf Large Language Models for Guiding Pharmacoepidemiological Study Design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1