Diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compound analysis in detecting colorectal polyps: meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae154
Asma Afzal, Yekaterina S Aranan, Tom Roberts, James Covington, Lorena Vidal, Sonia Ahmed, Talvinder Gill, Nader Francis
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compound analysis in detecting colorectal polyps: meta-analysis.","authors":"Asma Afzal, Yekaterina S Aranan, Tom Roberts, James Covington, Lorena Vidal, Sonia Ahmed, Talvinder Gill, Nader Francis","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the early detection of colorectal cancer, it is important to identify the premalignant lesions to prevent cancer development. Non-invasive testing methods such as the faecal immunochemical test are well established for the screening and triage of patients with suspected colorectal cancer but are not routinely used for polyps. Additionally, the role of volatile organic compounds has been tested for cancer detection. The aim of this review was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compounds in detecting colorectal polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original articles with diagnostic test accuracy measures for both the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compounds for advanced adenomas were included. Four databases including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and Web of Science were searched. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy study was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio® and the combined faecal immunochemical test-volatile organic compounds sensitivity and specificity were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two faecal immunochemical tests and 12 volatile organic compound-related articles were included in the systematic review whilst 18 faecal immunochemical tests and eight volatile organic compound-related studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity of the faecal immunochemical test to diagnose advanced adenoma(s) were 36% (95% c.i. 30 to 41) and 89% (95% c.i. 86 to 91) respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.65, whilst volatile organic compounds pooled sensitivity and specificity was 83% (95% c.i. 70 to 91) and 76% (95% c.i. 60 to 87) respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.84. The combined faecal immunochemical test-volatile organic compounds increased the sensitivity to 89% with a specificity of 67%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faecal immunochemical testing has a higher specificity but poor sensitivity for detecting advanced adenomas, while volatile organic compound analysis is more sensitive. The combination of both tests enhances the detection rate of advanced adenomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For the early detection of colorectal cancer, it is important to identify the premalignant lesions to prevent cancer development. Non-invasive testing methods such as the faecal immunochemical test are well established for the screening and triage of patients with suspected colorectal cancer but are not routinely used for polyps. Additionally, the role of volatile organic compounds has been tested for cancer detection. The aim of this review was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compounds in detecting colorectal polyps.

Methods: Original articles with diagnostic test accuracy measures for both the faecal immunochemical test and volatile organic compounds for advanced adenomas were included. Four databases including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and Web of Science were searched. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy study was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio® and the combined faecal immunochemical test-volatile organic compounds sensitivity and specificity were computed.

Results: Twenty-two faecal immunochemical tests and 12 volatile organic compound-related articles were included in the systematic review whilst 18 faecal immunochemical tests and eight volatile organic compound-related studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity of the faecal immunochemical test to diagnose advanced adenoma(s) were 36% (95% c.i. 30 to 41) and 89% (95% c.i. 86 to 91) respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.65, whilst volatile organic compounds pooled sensitivity and specificity was 83% (95% c.i. 70 to 91) and 76% (95% c.i. 60 to 87) respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.84. The combined faecal immunochemical test-volatile organic compounds increased the sensitivity to 89% with a specificity of 67%.

Conclusion: Faecal immunochemical testing has a higher specificity but poor sensitivity for detecting advanced adenomas, while volatile organic compound analysis is more sensitive. The combination of both tests enhances the detection rate of advanced adenomas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪便免疫化学试验和挥发性有机物分析在检测结肠直肠息肉中的诊断准确性:荟萃分析。
背景:对于大肠癌的早期发现,鉴别癌前病变,预防肿瘤发展具有重要意义。非侵入性检测方法,如粪便免疫化学试验,已被广泛用于筛查和分类疑似结直肠癌患者,但不常规用于息肉。此外,挥发性有机化合物在癌症检测中的作用也得到了测试。本综述的目的是确定粪便免疫化学试验和挥发性有机化合物在检测结肠直肠息肉中的诊断准确性。方法:纳入晚期腺瘤的粪便免疫化学试验和挥发性有机化合物诊断测试准确性的原始文章。检索医学文献分析与检索系统在线(MEDLINE)、护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase和Web of Science 4个数据库。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险和适用性。使用RStudio®进行meta分析,并联合粪便免疫化学测试-挥发性有机化合物的敏感性和特异性计算。结果:22篇粪便免疫化学测试和12篇与挥发性有机化合物相关的文章被纳入系统评价,18篇粪便免疫化学测试和8篇与挥发性有机化合物相关的研究被纳入meta分析。估计粪便免疫化学试验诊断晚期腺瘤的综合敏感性和特异性分别为36% (95% c.i. 30 ~ 41)和89% (95% c.i. 86 ~ 91),曲线下面积为0.65,而挥发性有机化合物的综合敏感性和特异性分别为83% (95% c.i. 70 ~ 91)和76% (95% c.i. 60 ~ 87),曲线下面积为0.84。联合粪便免疫化学测试-挥发性有机化合物将敏感性提高到89%,特异性提高到67%。结论:粪便免疫化学检测对晚期腺瘤的特异性较高,但敏感性较差,而挥发性有机物分析更敏感。两种检查的结合提高了晚期腺瘤的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: registry-based propensity score-matched analysis. Effect of hospital volume on gastric cancer resection outcome in Switzerland: 24-year nationwide retrospective analysis. Impact of prehabilitation on patient-perceived quality of recovery after surgery: prospective cohort study. Reinforced tension-line suture after laparotomy: long-term results of Rein4CeTo1 randomized clinical trial. Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for major Amputations (PINTA): protocol for randomized controlled trial of single-use NPWT devices for closed-incision major lower extremity amputations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1