Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w
Le Nguyen Binh, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Pham Thi Uyen Nhi, Do Le Hoang Son, Nguyen Bach, Hoang Quoc Huy, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Jiunn-Horng Kang
{"title":"Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Le Nguyen Binh, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Pham Thi Uyen Nhi, Do Le Hoang Son, Nguyen Bach, Hoang Quoc Huy, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Jiunn-Horng Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).

Results: The search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.

Conclusion: DL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
A high rate of mortality in liver cirrhosis patients after emergency abdominal surgery. Clavicle refractures after hardware removal: are there risk factors? A retrospective cohort study. Retrospective analysis of earthquake related crush injurie patients in ICU: 6-February earthquake in Türkiye. Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1