Prevalence of Spin in Reviews on Intrawound Application of Vancomycin for Surgical Site Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1177/21925682251322427
Sahil S Telang, Mallory A Podosin, Amir Fathi, Jacob L Kotlier, Cailan L Feingold, Ram K Alluri, Joseph N Liu
{"title":"Prevalence of Spin in Reviews on Intrawound Application of Vancomycin for Surgical Site Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery.","authors":"Sahil S Telang, Mallory A Podosin, Amir Fathi, Jacob L Kotlier, Cailan L Feingold, Ram K Alluri, Joseph N Liu","doi":"10.1177/21925682251322427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesSystematic reviews and meta-analyses that aggregate data on the intrawound application of vancomycin for surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis in spine surgeries are at an increased risk of spin, the overstating of beneficial effects of an intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify studies that coalesce outcomes of intrawound vancomycin SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries and define the prevalence and types of spin in the identified literature. Secondarily, this study aimed to identify patterns within study characteristics that were associated with certain spin types.MethodsThis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was performed in 4 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline and Cochrane) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on intrawound vancomycin use for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion criteria and then aggregated study characteristics: titles, publication journal and year, authors, level of evidence, etc. Each study was subsequently evaluated for the presence of 15 different spin types. Statistical analysis was performed for patterns between spin prevalence and study characteristics.ResultsFrom the database search, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 13 studies (72%) were found to have spin. The most common types of spin identified were spin type 9 (\"Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias\"), found in 9 (50.00%) studies and type 3 (\"Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention\"), found in 7 (38.89%) studies. ConclusionsThere is a high prevalence of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the intrawound application of vancomycin for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgery. Our analysis demonstrated that studies tended to selectively report positive findings while minimizing negative outcomes within abstracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2969-2976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251322427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesSystematic reviews and meta-analyses that aggregate data on the intrawound application of vancomycin for surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis in spine surgeries are at an increased risk of spin, the overstating of beneficial effects of an intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify studies that coalesce outcomes of intrawound vancomycin SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries and define the prevalence and types of spin in the identified literature. Secondarily, this study aimed to identify patterns within study characteristics that were associated with certain spin types.MethodsThis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was performed in 4 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline and Cochrane) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on intrawound vancomycin use for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion criteria and then aggregated study characteristics: titles, publication journal and year, authors, level of evidence, etc. Each study was subsequently evaluated for the presence of 15 different spin types. Statistical analysis was performed for patterns between spin prevalence and study characteristics.ResultsFrom the database search, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 13 studies (72%) were found to have spin. The most common types of spin identified were spin type 9 ("Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias"), found in 9 (50.00%) studies and type 3 ("Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention"), found in 7 (38.89%) studies. ConclusionsThere is a high prevalence of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the intrawound application of vancomycin for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgery. Our analysis demonstrated that studies tended to selectively report positive findings while minimizing negative outcomes within abstracts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于万古霉素在脊柱外科手术部位预防中的伤口内应用的综述。
研究设计:系统评价。目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析汇总了脊柱手术中万古霉素用于手术部位感染(SSI)预防的伤口内应用的数据,这些数据增加了旋转的风险,夸大了干预的有益效果。本研究的目的是确定合并脊柱手术中伤口内万古霉素SSI预防结果的研究,并确定已确定文献中旋转的患病率和类型。其次,本研究旨在确定与某些旋转类型相关的研究特征中的模式。方法:本研究采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。在4个数据库(PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline和Cochrane)中进行了检索,对脊柱手术中伤口内万古霉素用于SSI预防的系统评价和荟萃分析。两位作者独立评估研究的纳入标准,然后汇总研究特征:标题、发表期刊和年份、作者、证据水平等。随后对每个研究进行了15种不同自旋类型的评估。统计分析了自旋率与研究特征之间的关系。结果:从数据库检索中,有18项研究符合纳入标准。总共有13项研究(72%)被发现存在自旋。最常见的自旋类型是9型自旋(“结论声称实验治疗的有益效果,尽管报告存在偏差”),在9项(50.00%)研究中发现;3型自旋(“选择性报告或过度强调疗效结果或分析有利于实验干预的有益效果”),在7项(38.89%)研究中发现。结论:在脊柱外科手术中,万古霉素在伤口内应用预防SSI的系统综述和荟萃分析中,存在较高的自旋发生率。我们的分析表明,研究倾向于选择性地报道积极的发现,同时尽量减少摘要中的消极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
The Association of Vascular Health With Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy and Disc Degeneration. Enhanced Recovery After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An International Survey on Current Practice. Is Implant Removal After Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Truly Necessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiological, Functional and Safety Outcomes. Preoperative Predictors of Intramedullary Increased Signal Intensity and Risk Factors for Poor Recovery in Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. History of Trauma Preceding Cervical Disc Replacement Leads to Worse Postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1