Leveraging the Vascular Quality Initiative to reduce length of stay following elective carotid endarterectomy and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.232
Shernaz S. Dossabhoy MD, MBA , Tara Lahiji-Neary MBA , Jocelyn Morta NP , Lauran Miklosey RN , Thelma Flores RN , Carolyn King RN , Carlos A. Moreno BA , Rouchelyn Fallorina BA , Ani Bagdasarian MSN, MPH , Shipra Arya MD, SM , Jordan R. Stern MD , Jason T. Lee MD , Ronald L. Dalman MD
{"title":"Leveraging the Vascular Quality Initiative to reduce length of stay following elective carotid endarterectomy and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair","authors":"Shernaz S. Dossabhoy MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Tara Lahiji-Neary MBA ,&nbsp;Jocelyn Morta NP ,&nbsp;Lauran Miklosey RN ,&nbsp;Thelma Flores RN ,&nbsp;Carolyn King RN ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Moreno BA ,&nbsp;Rouchelyn Fallorina BA ,&nbsp;Ani Bagdasarian MSN, MPH ,&nbsp;Shipra Arya MD, SM ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Stern MD ,&nbsp;Jason T. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Ronald L. Dalman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Length of stay (LOS) is a key quality metric for the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). In 2021, our hospital was an outlier for ‘prolonged LOS’ after carotid endarterectomy (CEA &gt;1 day; 67% vs target 21%) and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR &gt;2 days; 36% vs target 22%). In response, we launched a quality improvement initiative to reduce LOS following elective CEA and EVAR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We completed a retrospective review of all CEA and EVAR cases (January 2021 to March 2022) using data obtained from VQI. During the intervention phase (April 2022 to July 2023), a multidisciplinary team defined the problem state, refined workflows, used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method to address key drivers, and maintained a prospective database of patients and LOS outcomes. Preoperative interventions educated patient stakeholders (eg, nurses, case managers, trainees) on LOS benchmarks, communicated expected discharge date and time to patients/families, and screened all patients for high-risk discharge, leading to prolonged LOS. After surgery, recovery protocols were standardized, including Foley catheter removal at midnight postoperative day 0 and physical therapy evaluation morning postoperative day 1. Primary outcomes, rates of prolonged LOS and mean LOS (days, hours), and secondary outcomes (discharge within 1 day, readmission, mortality) were compared pre- and postintervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 120 patients were included (48 CEA, 72 EVAR) with 52 (22 CEA, 31 EVAR) preintervention and 67 (26 CEA, 41 EVAR) postintervention. Over the intervention, rate of prolonged LOS significantly decreased from 50% to 15% for CEA (<em>P</em> = .01) and 26% to 7% for EVAR (<em>P</em> = .03), while mean LOS decreased for CEA from 2.2 ± 3.1 days to 1.2 ± 0.5 days (52.7 ± 75.7 hours to 27.7 ± 12.0 hours) and for EVAR from 2.3 ± 1.8 days to 1.5 ± 1.5 days (55.1 ± 43.2 hours to 36.9 ± 35.5 hours). Patients discharged within 1 day from surgery significantly increased from 50% to 85% for CEA and 45% to 76% for EVAR (both <em>P</em> = .01). Balancing measures of 30-day readmission and mortality did not significantly increase following our intervention, with three readmissions overall and no deaths in either cohort. Our Fall 2023 VQI Regional Report confirmed these findings with reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below regional and national targets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VQI benchmarking identifies system-wide, surgeon-specific quality improvement opportunities. Through engaging multidisciplinary teams and implementing patient-centric interventions across the care continuum, we successfully reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below VQI targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"82 1","pages":"Pages 248-256.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521425003271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Length of stay (LOS) is a key quality metric for the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). In 2021, our hospital was an outlier for ‘prolonged LOS’ after carotid endarterectomy (CEA >1 day; 67% vs target 21%) and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR >2 days; 36% vs target 22%). In response, we launched a quality improvement initiative to reduce LOS following elective CEA and EVAR.

Methods

We completed a retrospective review of all CEA and EVAR cases (January 2021 to March 2022) using data obtained from VQI. During the intervention phase (April 2022 to July 2023), a multidisciplinary team defined the problem state, refined workflows, used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method to address key drivers, and maintained a prospective database of patients and LOS outcomes. Preoperative interventions educated patient stakeholders (eg, nurses, case managers, trainees) on LOS benchmarks, communicated expected discharge date and time to patients/families, and screened all patients for high-risk discharge, leading to prolonged LOS. After surgery, recovery protocols were standardized, including Foley catheter removal at midnight postoperative day 0 and physical therapy evaluation morning postoperative day 1. Primary outcomes, rates of prolonged LOS and mean LOS (days, hours), and secondary outcomes (discharge within 1 day, readmission, mortality) were compared pre- and postintervention.

Results

Overall, 120 patients were included (48 CEA, 72 EVAR) with 52 (22 CEA, 31 EVAR) preintervention and 67 (26 CEA, 41 EVAR) postintervention. Over the intervention, rate of prolonged LOS significantly decreased from 50% to 15% for CEA (P = .01) and 26% to 7% for EVAR (P = .03), while mean LOS decreased for CEA from 2.2 ± 3.1 days to 1.2 ± 0.5 days (52.7 ± 75.7 hours to 27.7 ± 12.0 hours) and for EVAR from 2.3 ± 1.8 days to 1.5 ± 1.5 days (55.1 ± 43.2 hours to 36.9 ± 35.5 hours). Patients discharged within 1 day from surgery significantly increased from 50% to 85% for CEA and 45% to 76% for EVAR (both P = .01). Balancing measures of 30-day readmission and mortality did not significantly increase following our intervention, with three readmissions overall and no deaths in either cohort. Our Fall 2023 VQI Regional Report confirmed these findings with reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below regional and national targets.

Conclusions

VQI benchmarking identifies system-wide, surgeon-specific quality improvement opportunities. Through engaging multidisciplinary teams and implementing patient-centric interventions across the care continuum, we successfully reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below VQI targets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用血管质量倡议减少选择性颈动脉内膜切除术和血管内主动脉瘤修复后的住院时间。
目的:住院时间(LOS)是血管外科学会血管质量倡议(VQI)的一个关键质量指标。在2021年,我院是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA >1天,67%,目标21%)和血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR >2天,36%,目标22%)后“延长的LOS”的异常值。作为回应,我们发起了一项质量改进(QI)倡议,以减少选择性CEA和EVAR后的LOS。方法:我们使用VQI获得的数据完成了所有CEA和EVAR病例(2021年1月至2022年3月)的回顾性研究。在干预阶段(2022年4月至2023年7月),一个多学科团队定义了问题状态,完善了工作流程,使用计划-执行-研究-行动方法解决关键驱动因素,并维护了患者和LOS结果的前瞻性数据库。术前干预对患者利益相关者(如护士、病例管理人员、受训人员)进行LOS基准教育,向患者/家属传达预期出院日期和时间,并筛查所有高危出院患者,导致LOS延长。手术后,恢复方案标准化,包括午夜po0 Foley导管拔除和早上po1物理治疗评估。比较干预前后的主要结局、延长的LOS率和平均LOS(天、小时)以及次要结局(1天内出院、再入院、死亡率)。结果:共纳入120例患者(48例CEA, 72例EVAR),干预前52例(22例CEA, 31例EVAR),干预后67例(26例CEA, 41例EVAR)。在干预期间,CEA的延长LOS率从50%显著下降到15% (P= 0.01), EVAR的延长LOS率从26%显著下降到7% (P= 0.03)。CEA的平均LOS从2.2±3.1天降至1.2±0.5天(52.7±75.7小时降至27.7±12.0小时),EVAR的平均LOS从2.3±1.8天降至1.5±1.5天(55.1±43.2小时降至36.9±35.5小时)。术后1天内出院的CEA患者从50%增加到85%,EVAR患者从45%增加到76% (P= 0.01)。在我们的干预后,30天再入院率和死亡率的平衡指标没有显著增加,两个队列中总共有3例再入院,没有死亡。我们的2023年秋季VQI区域报告证实了这些发现,CEA和EVAR的LOS低于区域和国家目标。结论:VQI基准确定了全系统、外科特定的QI机会。通过多学科团队的参与和在整个护理过程中实施以患者为中心的干预措施,我们成功地将CEA和EVAR的LOS降低到VQI目标以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The society for vascular surgery clinical practice guideline on the management of blunt thoracic aortic injury: A focused update. Expansion and rupture due to endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm A case of Behçet disease complicated with multiple false aneurysms of the aorta The effect of aneurysm diameter on perioperative outcomes following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair Early outcomes for women and men after open extent III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1