Early-season predictions of aerial spores to enhance infection model efficacy for Cercospora leaf spot management in sugarbeet.

IF 4.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Plant disease Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1094/PDIS-10-24-2153-RE
Alexandra P Hernandez, Chris Bloomingdale, Sarah Ruth, Erica Cushnie, Cheryl Trueman, Linda Hanson, Jaime F Willbur
{"title":"Early-season predictions of aerial spores to enhance infection model efficacy for Cercospora leaf spot management in sugarbeet.","authors":"Alexandra P Hernandez, Chris Bloomingdale, Sarah Ruth, Erica Cushnie, Cheryl Trueman, Linda Hanson, Jaime F Willbur","doi":"10.1094/PDIS-10-24-2153-RE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Cercospora beticola</i> causes one of the most destructive foliar diseases of sugarbeet in many growing regions. Management of Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) relies heavily on timely and repeated fungicide applications. Current treatment initiation is often supported by models predicting conditions favorable for infection; however, these models lack information of <i>C. beticola</i> presence and abundance. Burkard volumetric mechanical samplers and highly CLS-susceptible sentinel beets (biological samplers) were used to assess early-season aerial <i>C. beticola</i> conidia from sugarbeet fields in Michigan and in Ontario, Canada from 2019-2022. In initial correlation and logistic regression analyses (n=449), duration of leaf wetness, air temperature, and wind speed were found to predict the risk of elevated <i>Cercospora</i> spore concentrations with 67.9% accuracy. In 2022 and 2023, a select model and a limited set of action thresholds, in addition to the BEETcast model, were tested for fungicide application timing. When CLS pressure was high, extending the interval between applications showed reduced management of CLS (<i>P</i> < 0.001), sugar percentage, and RWS (<i>P</i> < 0.05) compared to the grower standard. Model-based programs integrating canopy closure information resulted in CLS, yield, and sugar metrics comparable to the grower standard despite one less fungicide application. In additional training analysis (n=402), an ensemble model included leaf wetness, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed variables with a testing accuracy of 73.2% (n=101). Based on model development, refinement, and validation, assessment of elevated early-season <i>C. beticola</i> presence and abundance has potential to improve application timing and efficacy for preventative CLS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20063,"journal":{"name":"Plant disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-24-2153-RE","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cercospora beticola causes one of the most destructive foliar diseases of sugarbeet in many growing regions. Management of Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) relies heavily on timely and repeated fungicide applications. Current treatment initiation is often supported by models predicting conditions favorable for infection; however, these models lack information of C. beticola presence and abundance. Burkard volumetric mechanical samplers and highly CLS-susceptible sentinel beets (biological samplers) were used to assess early-season aerial C. beticola conidia from sugarbeet fields in Michigan and in Ontario, Canada from 2019-2022. In initial correlation and logistic regression analyses (n=449), duration of leaf wetness, air temperature, and wind speed were found to predict the risk of elevated Cercospora spore concentrations with 67.9% accuracy. In 2022 and 2023, a select model and a limited set of action thresholds, in addition to the BEETcast model, were tested for fungicide application timing. When CLS pressure was high, extending the interval between applications showed reduced management of CLS (P < 0.001), sugar percentage, and RWS (P < 0.05) compared to the grower standard. Model-based programs integrating canopy closure information resulted in CLS, yield, and sugar metrics comparable to the grower standard despite one less fungicide application. In additional training analysis (n=402), an ensemble model included leaf wetness, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed variables with a testing accuracy of 73.2% (n=101). Based on model development, refinement, and validation, assessment of elevated early-season C. beticola presence and abundance has potential to improve application timing and efficacy for preventative CLS management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant disease
Plant disease 农林科学-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1993
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Disease is the leading international journal for rapid reporting of research on new, emerging, and established plant diseases. The journal publishes papers that describe basic and applied research focusing on practical aspects of disease diagnosis, development, and management.
期刊最新文献
Fusarium boothii, Fusarium meridionale, and Fusarium temperatum Are Emerging Preharvest Maize Ear Rot Pathogens in Ethiopia. Yellow dwarf viruses: aphid transmission efficiency and cereal host range. Ganoderma adspersum, the Cause of Extensive Wood Decay of Almond Trees in California Orchards. Early-season predictions of aerial spores to enhance infection model efficacy for Cercospora leaf spot management in sugarbeet. First Report of Ralstonia pesudosolanacearum Causing Bacterial Wilt of Canna edulis in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1