Quantitative evaluation of unsupervised clustering algorithms for dynamic total-body PET image analysis.

Oona Rainio, Maria K Jaakkola, Riku Klén
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of unsupervised clustering algorithms for dynamic total-body PET image analysis.","authors":"Oona Rainio, Maria K Jaakkola, Riku Klén","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2025.2466834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, dynamic total-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has become possible due to new scanner devices. However, there is still little research systematically evaluating clustering algorithms for processing of dynamic total-body PET images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Here, we compare the performance of 15 unsupervised clustering methods, including K-means either by itself or after principal component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), fuzzy c-means (FCM), agglomerative clustering, spectral clustering, and several newer clustering algorithms, for classifying time activity curves (TACs) in dynamic PET images. We use dynamic total-body <sup>15</sup>O-water PET images of 30 patients. To evaluate the clustering algorithms in a quantitative way, we use them to classify 5000 TACs from each image based on whether the curve is taken from brain, right heart ventricle, right kidney, lower right lung lobe, or urinary bladder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to our results, the best methods are GMM, FCM, and ICA combined with mini batch K-means, which classified the TACs with a median accuracies of 89%, 83%, and 81%, respectively, in a processing time of half a second or less.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GMM, FCM, and ICA with mini batch K-means show promise for dynamic total-body PET analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2466834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, dynamic total-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has become possible due to new scanner devices. However, there is still little research systematically evaluating clustering algorithms for processing of dynamic total-body PET images.

Materials and methods: Here, we compare the performance of 15 unsupervised clustering methods, including K-means either by itself or after principal component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), fuzzy c-means (FCM), agglomerative clustering, spectral clustering, and several newer clustering algorithms, for classifying time activity curves (TACs) in dynamic PET images. We use dynamic total-body 15O-water PET images of 30 patients. To evaluate the clustering algorithms in a quantitative way, we use them to classify 5000 TACs from each image based on whether the curve is taken from brain, right heart ventricle, right kidney, lower right lung lobe, or urinary bladder.

Results: According to our results, the best methods are GMM, FCM, and ICA combined with mini batch K-means, which classified the TACs with a median accuracies of 89%, 83%, and 81%, respectively, in a processing time of half a second or less.

Conclusion: GMM, FCM, and ICA with mini batch K-means show promise for dynamic total-body PET analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.
期刊最新文献
A protocol for the assessment of uroflowmeters. Quantitative evaluation of unsupervised clustering algorithms for dynamic total-body PET image analysis. Transforming orthodontic retention: potential of 3D printing and biocompatible material characteristics. Improving real-time physiological signs estimation using plethysmography wave and heterogeneous embedded system. Deep transfer learning based hierarchical CAD system designs for SFM images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1