Health-related quality of life after major extremity trauma: qualitative research with military service members and clinicians to inform measurement of patient-reported outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03915-0
Callie E Tyner, Pamela A Kisala, Jerry Slotkin, Matthew L Cohen, Jill M Cancio, Alison L Pruziner, Christopher L Dearth, David S Tulsky
{"title":"Health-related quality of life after major extremity trauma: qualitative research with military service members and clinicians to inform measurement of patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Callie E Tyner, Pamela A Kisala, Jerry Slotkin, Matthew L Cohen, Jill M Cancio, Alison L Pruziner, Christopher L Dearth, David S Tulsky","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03915-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand health-related quality of life (HRQOL) factors for adults who experience major extremity trauma, including limb preservation and amputation, to guide the selection and creation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thematic content qualitative analysis was used to study service members (SMs) with a history of major extremity trauma and clinical providers with expertise in limb trauma, limb loss, and limb preservation/reconstruction. Focus groups were conducted at three Military Treatment Facilities and one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six SMs and 34 clinicians participated. Thirty-six percent of focus group comments were coded under Physical Health, 31% Emotional Health, and 28% Social Participation. These results were largely consistent across clinicians and SMs, and clinical subgroups, with a few exceptions such as the relevance of fine motor tasks and prosthetic devices for SMs with upper extremity injury/limb loss, and orthotic devices for SMs with limb preservation/reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many HRQOL topics identified are shared with existing general PRO measures-including pain, physical function, anxiety, depression, anger, positive affect and well-being, fatigue, social participation, and loneliness-as well as rehabilitation-focused PRO measures-such as resilience, grief/loss, stigma, self-esteem, mobility, fine motor functioning, self-care, and independence. This qualitative research can be used to inform domains of HRQOL in need of new PRO measures for this population, including satisfaction with orthosis/prosthesis, satisfaction with physical abilities/athleticism, body image, future outlook, and vocational impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"3351-3364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12689715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03915-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand health-related quality of life (HRQOL) factors for adults who experience major extremity trauma, including limb preservation and amputation, to guide the selection and creation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

Methods: A thematic content qualitative analysis was used to study service members (SMs) with a history of major extremity trauma and clinical providers with expertise in limb trauma, limb loss, and limb preservation/reconstruction. Focus groups were conducted at three Military Treatment Facilities and one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Results: Fifty-six SMs and 34 clinicians participated. Thirty-six percent of focus group comments were coded under Physical Health, 31% Emotional Health, and 28% Social Participation. These results were largely consistent across clinicians and SMs, and clinical subgroups, with a few exceptions such as the relevance of fine motor tasks and prosthetic devices for SMs with upper extremity injury/limb loss, and orthotic devices for SMs with limb preservation/reconstruction.

Conclusion: Many HRQOL topics identified are shared with existing general PRO measures-including pain, physical function, anxiety, depression, anger, positive affect and well-being, fatigue, social participation, and loneliness-as well as rehabilitation-focused PRO measures-such as resilience, grief/loss, stigma, self-esteem, mobility, fine motor functioning, self-care, and independence. This qualitative research can be used to inform domains of HRQOL in need of new PRO measures for this population, including satisfaction with orthosis/prosthesis, satisfaction with physical abilities/athleticism, body image, future outlook, and vocational impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重大肢体创伤后与健康相关的生活质量:对军人和临床医生的定性研究,为患者报告结果的测量提供信息。
目的:本研究的目的是了解经历严重肢体创伤(包括肢体保留和截肢)的成年人的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)因素,以指导选择和创建患者报告的结果(PRO)指标。方法:采用主题内容定性分析的方法,对有重大肢体创伤史的军人和具有肢体创伤、肢体丧失和肢体保存/重建专业知识的临床服务提供者进行研究。焦点小组在三个军事治疗设施和一个退伍军人事务部医疗中心进行。结果:56名SMs和34名临床医生参与。36%的焦点小组评论被编码为“身体健康”,31%的人被编码为“情绪健康”,28%的人被编码为“社会参与”。这些结果在临床医生和SMs以及临床亚组中基本一致,只有少数例外,例如精细运动任务和上肢损伤/肢体丧失的SMs假肢装置的相关性,以及用于肢体保存/重建的SMs矫形器。结论:确定的许多HRQOL主题与现有的一般PRO测量(包括疼痛、身体功能、焦虑、抑郁、愤怒、积极影响和幸福感、疲劳、社会参与和孤独感)以及以康复为重点的PRO测量(如恢复力、悲伤/损失、耻辱、自尊、行动能力、精细运动功能、自我照顾和独立性)是共享的。该定性研究可用于告知需要对该人群进行新的PRO测量的HRQOL领域,包括对矫形器/假体的满意度,对身体能力/运动能力的满意度,身体形象,未来前景和职业影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Cancer-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A validity comparison across six commonly diagnosed cancers. The semantic differential questionnaire format warrants consideration for use in healthcare settings. Engagement is more than a checkbox: a patient's perspective. Effects of nonpharmacological interventions on post-stroke quality of life: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Understanding decision-making strategies in discrete choice experiment tasks when valuing health states that include duration, a cognitive interview study with Australian adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1